Instead of telling readers the Republican Party is offering financial incentives for deadly vaccine refusal, and instead of noting the disconnect between these policies and the GOP’s long-stated hostility to benefits for those who refuse to work, Axios hypes the GOP’s “messaging”
Be Smart: Don’t read Axios.
Why It Matters: Axios’s cheerleading for the GOP kills people.
Seriously, that shit will rot your brain and destroy society. All it has going for it is that it doesn’t take long to read. But that’s like eating a shit sandwich because it isn’t a foot-long.
REPUBLICANS: Here’s some money. Go buy some poison and put it in the town drinking supply.
MEDIA: Wow. That’s a pretty fuckin’ savvy way to appeal to millions of Americans who feel frustrated by onerous pandemic restrictions. Powerful messaging indeed.
Also, just as a matter of basic writing, what the fuck does “no matter how successful their individual efforts, the campaign is a powerful messaging weapon” even mean? (Answer: It’s just brainless GOP cheerleading, like Clemson basketball fans yelling “we’re #1” at ESPN cameras.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
One thing is clear: Mark Meadows is a piece of shit.
It was pretty clear in October 2020 that there was a really good chance Trump went to the debate knowing he had tested positive — if you were willing to admit the obvious truth about Trump’s sociopathy.
And yet at the time reporters kept asking if Trump had received a *negative* test before the debate, when it was obvious that the right question was whether he had received a *positive* test:
What a low bar for celebration. High-fives for (they thought) *not* spreading misinformation and hate. It’s like congratulating your coworker for not stabbing the UPS guy.
Facebook shutting down its (inadequate) efforts to stop election-related misinformation after Election Day is particularly stupid if you keep in mind that we all should have known since 2016 that Trump would claim victory if he lost.
This isn’t hindsight; here’s one example (of many) from me, in 2017, predicting that Trump would lose in 2020 and declare himself the winner and his supporters would turn violent. And I’m just Some Guy; if I knew this why the fuck didn’t Facebook?
Honestly I would be pretty fucking angry if I found out Joe Biden *doesn’t* routinely say “Why the fuck isn’t this happening?” or “What the fuck are we doing?” or, most of all, “Fuck them.”
More people bought Tapestry than any album by Billy Joel or James Taylor. It’s hard to imagine a political reporter expressing incredulity that either of them could be useful in a fundraising context. I wonder what might be different about Carole King to cause skepticism?
(Also Tapestry is great. Carole King is a national treasure.)
Since the commission was formed in April, the Supreme Court has gutted the Voting Rights Act, let Texas ban abortion, made it harder for workers to organize, blocked an eviction moratorium, and forced asylum seekers to remain in Mexico. All since April.
It is not a good sign that the WH Supreme Court commission has released its “discussion materials” and the section on court expansion opens by repeating — but not correcting — a Republican lie.
A Democratic senate confirmed a Reagan SCOTUS nominee in 1988.
The White House commission *knows* that Republican lie is a lie — it received testimony from @AaronBelkin correcting the lie back in August. Yet they repeated it anyway, without correction. whitehouse.gov/wp-content/upl…
I basically never read Rubin and back when I did I was critical of her; I have no opinion on whatever evolution she has or hasn't undergone. But if The Nation did this to some National Review writer Politico would publish three pieces about the Left's "Jewish Problem" by Tuesday.
(also, having a few times given reporters quotes blasting their news company and the existence of the article for which they were seeking comment, only to see my quote excluded from the article, it's hilarious to think that putting the quote off the record might've gotten it in.)