8 years ago I took the case of a young girl fleeing a horrific situation in her country. Because she got the right advice at the right time, we got her a green card as a "special immigrant juvenile."

Today, her application for naturalization was recommended for approval.
She blew through the civics, reading, and writing tests without making a single mistake: even her handwriting was the neatest I've seen!
Truthfully, this was an easy case: even getting her out of deportation years ago and winning her green card.
But a lot could have gone wrong: only a couple of years after she got her green card, Virginia decided it would no longer issue the court orders necessary to get SIJS.
And over the last few years, some immigration judges wouldn't have terminated her deportation case simply because she was waiting on a green card.
My point is, the law CAN work smoothly. But even the way the law operates is manipulated to produce the opposite result.
All of this would have been beyond my poor client's control. But the law worked for her, instead of against her. She entered the US illegally as a child.

Now, she'll be a citizen.

Remember this when they scream "send them back!"

It does NOT have to be this way.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Hassan Ahmad

Hassan Ahmad Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @HMAesq

21 Nov
My dad shared this with me today. A letter dated 60 years ago that confirms his last name registration as Ahmad.

Naming conventions differ wildly around the world. When he was born, my father was not given a "last name."
He may have been known as son of Chiragh-ud-din, his father. Or perhaps by the village of his birth, clan, or family occupation. But when he immigrated to England in the early 1960's, he needed a last name. So he picked one.

We've only been Ahmads for 60 years, as of yesterday.
In my practice, we deal with a wide variety of naming conventions: Latino conventions with both parents' last names, Chinese with the family name first, transcription variances from non-Roman alphabets, and "last names" that aren't family names.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Update on #TantonPapers Lawsuit:

@UMich, after losing at the Mich Supreme Court, and losing again on remand, is re-appealing the case up to the Michigan Court of Appeals.

We had asked them to prepare a log of which FOIA exemptions they thought applied to the sealed papers.
Of course they resisted, even after the Court ordered them to. Now they're appealing that.

I get that UM is part of the identity of the State of Michigan.

Why they're fighting to keep an influential white nationalist's papers secret is beyond me.
Curiously, they're arguing that unsealing the papers inhibits access to knowledge.

Same old argument: "No one will donate to us!"

There are simple things donors can do to effectuate their intent. I'm not saying donors can't do those things.

Just that Tanton didn't.
Read 4 tweets
20 Oct
Every time I win an asylum claim I'm struck by how much has to go right to eke out a win.

I'm overjoyed for my client, who's breathing sighs of relief through the numbness. As his lawyer, I try to prep giving a holistic view of the entire system but that's risky: too scary.
I can't say much about the claim, but his deportation would have been a death sentence. His persecutors are still looking for him.

I can't imagine the courage it takes to testify in an asylum hearing. But our judge was willing to listen and get the truth.

That's all we ask for.
Just a chance. That's what due process is about.

It was a good case. But still so many places it could have gone wrong, not the least of which was location of the court. These things shouldn't matter, but they do.
Read 4 tweets
11 Oct
Camouflaged white nationalists Exhibit 843: @JoeGuzzardi19. This guy writes for @PFIRorg (yeah: Progressives for Immigration Reform) a Tanton-Network front group.

The usual drivel: "Haitians are coming, and Afghans too, what will we do? Remember in '22!"

news-journal.com/opinion/guzzar…
What's funny - or sad - is this article came with this Bible verse: Image
What about these commandments, Joe?

“The alien who resides with you shall be to you as the citizen among you; you shall love the alien as yourself, for you were aliens in the land of Egypt: I am the Lord your God.” – Leviticus 19:34
Read 9 tweets
10 Oct
The anti-immigrant movement should really be called the deportation movement. that's what they're really about.

Think about how different the discourse would be if we were arguing about how to let people in instead of how to keep - and kick - them out.
Nearly seventy years ago, the Supreme Court described deportation as "a drastic punishment, and at times equivalent to banishment or exile." Finding the stakes to be high, it refused to read laws resulting in deportation broadly.
Since then, Congress has passed increasingly broad deportation laws. Long-term immigrants are deported for minor infractions to countries they never knew. Others who flee persecution are deported to their deaths. The machine sweeps up even some US citizens and immigrant veterans.
Read 14 tweets
3 Oct
We immigration lawyers have become desensitized to the struggles of our clients.

This is not to say we don't feel for them. We do. But it doesn't shock us.

Meanwhile, the vast majority of people still ask questions like, "Why can't they come legally?"
So here are some things our clients commonly face that most people may not realize.

Remember, these aren't isolated examples.

These are the rules, not the exceptions.
"My mom is dying of cancer and I can't go home to be with her."

Why? The 10 year bar to reentry, introduced by the most Draconian immigration legislation from 1996: IIRIRA.
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(