Prosperity doesn’t decrease scarcity claims. Arguably, it increases them. What we are supposed to make of these claims is another story. But I would posit a correlation between the proliferation of crypto tokens and anxiety.
This is all to say I’m launching a coin called $FOMO. There’s only one. But every time you buy it it divides into ten.
Basically, Lessing’s Nathan the Wise was about Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as fractional shares of an NFT, only two were forgeries. Problem is we’ll never know which ones are just JPEGs.
On the other hand, the Midrash says Torah was given in the desert so none could claim ownership of it. The flip side of being available to all is being ownerless, infinitely scarce.
Torah is Black letters on white letters.
What are black letters? Ownerships claims.
What are white letters? The desert where property is pointless.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Time for a @threadapalooza on Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav (1772-1810), a mystic and storyteller, who combined spiritual genius with a modernist literary sensibility. Rebbe Nachman is the sage of paradox, a depressive who believed in the liberating power of unreasonable joy.
Rebbe Nachman's usefulness and insight transcends the boundaries of his strict followers, those who tread the earth chanting "Na-na-nachman-M'uman..." Even if you disagree with his conclusions he is the best adversary there is, a formidable critic of intellectualism. 2
Rebbe Nachman (from now on, just Nachman), was the great grandson of the founder of Hasidism, the Baal Shem Tov. Nachman's innovations were many, but to me, the greatest is his use of story or parable to convey his message. 3
“Joseph was never a child: he was a great man trapped in the body of a little boy.“
“The colorful tunic which Jacob gifts Joseph is an icon of mimetic rivalry. Its desirability derives from its scarcity, representing Jacob’s scarce love… There is no modest way to wear a garment whose meaning and intent is to demonstrate preferential treatment.”
On the one hand, agreed. On the other hand, lots in academia also just kinda strikes me as a repetition of Adorno’s critique of the Jargon of Authenticity. Is anything new under the sun? But fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.
Archilochus was the first Romantic. His motto: “Normalize Cowardice.”
The problems with romanticism:
1. Delusions of grandeur, egomania. 2. Fake solidarity with the common man, pseudo-populism. 3. Celebration of anything opaque. 4. Aestheticization of politics.
And so the gift (mincha) went on ahead, while [Jacob] remained in the camp (machaneh) that night. (Genesis 32:22)
And [Esau] asked, “What do you mean by all this company [machane] which I have met?” [Jacob] answered, “To gain my lord’s favor (chen).” (33:8)
According to rabbinic interpretation, the meeting between Jacob and Esau is a world-historical encounter, a compressed sign of all that is to come in the conflict between Jerusalem and Rome.
I never made the connection between autonomy and mon-ocularity, but it’s a fascinating and vivid one. Heteronomy as binocularity. Kafka knew this well.
Time for a @threadapalooza on Michel Foucault (1926-1984), historian of madness, archaeologist of the marginal, skeptic, existentialist, culture war touchstone, enfant terrible turned god of hipsters, and one of the most original and brilliant minds of the 20th century.
Whether you love or hate Foucault, whether you agree or disagree with him, his thought is THE thought of our time. You cannot study the humanities at an Ivy League school without reading him. 2
And even if you don't read him directly, his claims have trickled down into the reigning ideology of both elites and counter-elites. Foucault is intellectual napalm. 3