Prosperity doesn’t decrease scarcity claims. Arguably, it increases them. What we are supposed to make of these claims is another story. But I would posit a correlation between the proliferation of crypto tokens and anxiety.

H/t @matt_levine
This is all to say I’m launching a coin called $FOMO. There’s only one. But every time you buy it it divides into ten.
Basically, Lessing’s Nathan the Wise was about Judaism, Christianity, and Islam as fractional shares of an NFT, only two were forgeries. Problem is we’ll never know which ones are just JPEGs.
On the other hand, the Midrash says Torah was given in the desert so none could claim ownership of it. The flip side of being available to all is being ownerless, infinitely scarce.

Torah is Black letters on white letters.
What are black letters? Ownerships claims.

What are white letters? The desert where property is pointless.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zohar Atkins

Zohar Atkins Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZoharAtkins

1 Dec
Time for a @threadapalooza on Rabbi Nachman of Bratslav (1772-1810), a mystic and storyteller, who combined spiritual genius with a modernist literary sensibility. Rebbe Nachman is the sage of paradox, a depressive who believed in the liberating power of unreasonable joy.
Rebbe Nachman's usefulness and insight transcends the boundaries of his strict followers, those who tread the earth chanting "Na-na-nachman-M'uman..." Even if you disagree with his conclusions he is the best adversary there is, a formidable critic of intellectualism. 2
Rebbe Nachman (from now on, just Nachman), was the great grandson of the founder of Hasidism, the Baal Shem Tov. Nachman's innovations were many, but to me, the greatest is his use of story or parable to convey his message. 3
Read 100 tweets
26 Nov
If you want to understand the Joseph story, follow the clothing, especially the coat of many colors.

Wrote about the importance of breaking illusions and puncturing personas in an effort to find freedom and true love.

etzhasadeh.substack.com/p/vanishing-po…
“Joseph was never a child: he was a great man trapped in the body of a little boy.“
“The colorful tunic which Jacob gifts Joseph is an icon of mimetic rivalry. Its desirability derives from its scarcity, representing Jacob’s scarce love… There is no modest way to wear a garment whose meaning and intent is to demonstrate preferential treatment.”
Read 6 tweets
23 Nov
On the one hand, agreed. On the other hand, lots in academia also just kinda strikes me as a repetition of Adorno’s critique of the Jargon of Authenticity. Is anything new under the sun? But fear of the Lord is the beginning of wisdom.
Archilochus was the first Romantic. His motto: “Normalize Cowardice.”
The problems with romanticism:

1. Delusions of grandeur, egomania.
2. Fake solidarity with the common man, pseudo-populism.
3. Celebration of anything opaque.
4. Aestheticization of politics.
Read 5 tweets
19 Nov
I wrote about how to make peace and end rivalry, looking at the story of Jacob and Esau.

The key lies in the Torah's play on three words:

mincha (gift/sacrifice)
machane (camp/company/troop)
chen (grace favor)

etzhasadeh.substack.com/p/beauty-is-pe…
And so the gift (mincha) went on ahead, while [Jacob] remained in the camp (machaneh) that night. (Genesis 32:22)

And [Esau] asked, “What do you mean by all this company [machane] which I have met?” [Jacob] answered, “To gain my lord’s favor (chen).” (33:8)
According to rabbinic interpretation, the meeting between Jacob and Esau is a world-historical encounter, a compressed sign of all that is to come in the conflict between Jerusalem and Rome.
Read 11 tweets
17 Nov
I never made the connection between autonomy and mon-ocularity, but it’s a fascinating and vivid one. Heteronomy as binocularity. Kafka knew this well.
In Kafka, the human condition is riven by the incommensurate demands of heaven and earth.
Autonomous beings, like Homer’s Cyclopses, feel no rift.
Read 8 tweets
11 Nov
Time for a @threadapalooza on Michel Foucault (1926-1984), historian of madness, archaeologist of the marginal, skeptic, existentialist, culture war touchstone, enfant terrible turned god of hipsters, and one of the most original and brilliant minds of the 20th century.
Whether you love or hate Foucault, whether you agree or disagree with him, his thought is THE thought of our time. You cannot study the humanities at an Ivy League school without reading him. 2
And even if you don't read him directly, his claims have trickled down into the reigning ideology of both elites and counter-elites. Foucault is intellectual napalm. 3
Read 100 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(