This new piece has gotten more reads in its first day than anything else I've written since this newsletter launched.

Here's what you need to know.

(Thread)

alexsteffen.substack.com/p/ruggedize-yo…
“When it comes to the planetary crisis, the most important question you can ask yourself is 'Where?'”

That's because climate chaos and ecological collapse are hitting differently in different places, and some places are better positioned to weather the storm than others. Image
"We must begin by understanding the nature of the crisis."

We've entered a crisis so large and complex that it is no longer an issue, but an era. It is a discontinuity with everything we're used to thinking of as normal.

Most of us are still catching up.
alexsteffen.substack.com/p/were-not-yet…
In this era of crisis, where you live will be a better predictor of the prospects you and your family have than any other factor. Image
Some places are brittle. That is, the tolerances for which they are built — the conditions they need to function — are more and more likely to be overrun. They are at real risk for catastrophic failure.

You don't want to live in a brittle place.

treehugger.com/climate-change…
In fact, you don't even want to be in a region where many places and systems are brittle, if you can avoid it. Image
(There are more of those regions than is comfortable to contemplate... and the hotter it gets, the more places will be baked into brittleness.) Image
Geographical advantages — e.g., generally cooler temperatures, less exposure to drought, less risk of flooding — are hugely important.

But even where the odds are decent, we're going to need to ruggedize on a huge scale.

alexsteffen.substack.com/p/ruggedization
Ruggedization centers on "designing responses that can mobilize the resources needed for rapid, large-scale change by making those approaches powerful opportunities rather than just protective investments."
Personal ruggedization is the process of choosing your circumstances and setting up your life in such a way that rapid change becomes a chance to do better, to find long-term security and ways to succeed in the service of your purpose. Image
Of course, if you're wealthy enough, you don't have to seek out a good place to land and work with others to ruggedize it.

You can just buy yourself a luxury survival compound.

They don't come cheap—you have to have a net worth in the tens of millions to even buy into the game. Image
The reality is that most of us are not in this position.

Indeed, hundreds of millions of people lack the resources needed to ruggedize their lives much at all, even as they are the most vulnerable to ecological chaos.

This is a transapocalyptic world.
alexsteffen.substack.com/p/the-transapo…
For a huge number of people, moving away from danger and towards stability is the only realistic strategy they have.

The problem is, we face a massive ruggedization bottleneck.

There are far too few places being ruggedized for the number of people who need (and, in my opinion, deserve) safer places to live.

Many poor people face barriers of distance and borders closed to newcomers.
"You cannot save yourself by moving if the place you need to move to won’t let you in."
But borders are not the only boundaries.

For a huge number of people in the wealthier parts of the world, it's the cost of living (especially housing) that excludes them from safer places.

Access to well-prepared places is often limited to the already well-off. Image
That's in part because well-off people are recognizing that the combination of lower disaster risks, good urban form and infrastructure, and wealthy neighbors is the closest thing most countries have to future-ready places to live... and they'll pay a premium to own there.
If you can afford to buy into a community like that, it might be smart to do so.

But competing for a limited and unprecedentedly costly supply of chances to live in that kind of place is not a realistic strategy for even a lot of successful people.
Most of us need to look for different kinds of opportunity. But time is running short. Big money is on its way. Image
My next letter will explore some of the strategies available to people who live in the wealthy world, have some means, but are not rich as they seek a place to ruggedize their lives.
You can get my letters for free by signing up here.

If you want to support the work, and get access to my podcast with its deeper explorations of these topics, you can become a supporter of the project for as little as $15 a month.

Good luck out there!

alexsteffen.substack.com/subscribe

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Alex Steffen

Alex Steffen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @AlexSteffen

3 Dec
Billions of us are about to go thru a fierce shock of temporal dislocation — of waking up to realize we've been swept up in a vast, heartless discontinuity, one that has been accelerating for years, one we've either ignored or imagined happening sometime in someone else's future.
The cultural, political and psychological impacts of this dislocation are beyond calculation.

I've spent a lot of time studying history, in graduate school and since. I believe there is no analog.

I find that deeply concerning.

I find our unreadiness for it totally terrifying.
I wish it were clearer to me where and how the practices of desperate societal-scale triage and of loving kindness meet.
Read 8 tweets
2 Dec
Folks really don't get the scale of change that is now arriving.

So many powerful interests have a stake in minimizing the urgency/downplaying the scale of discontinuity.

So many people find it easier to denounce the idea of discontinuity than face failed cultural assumptions.
Here in the U.S., almost no part of our debate is fully engaged with the realities of inexorable, discontinuous change—or the disruptiveness of the actions that have now become inevitable.

But we've got lots of predatory delay, downplaying, goalwashing & triangulation.
A major symptom:

How much concern there is for protecting people from the costs of action and how little there is for protecting them from the staggeringly larger harms of inaction.

Read 5 tweets
2 Dec
This @kimmelman story is a must-read.

"A process of participatory planning, rightly evolved to represent interests other than government technocrats and wealthy developers, has also created a culture of Nimby-ism that thwarts even modest proposals."

nytimes.com/2021/12/02/us/…
"Our conversations seem increasingly cramped, mean and small. Is our society just too frayed to come together around basic material needs?"
In an age of growing and combining climate, ecological and economic risks, the inability to most fast and build big is effectively the same thing as an inability to act at all.

Process designed for once-good reasons becomes a massive vulnerability in its own right.
Read 5 tweets
26 Nov
The politics of tempo, foreign policy edition.

82% of Dems consider climate change a critical threat to the U.S. over the next ten years; only 16% of GOP does.

53% of Americans, overall.

thechicagocouncil.org/sites/default/…
This is what 50 years of predatory delay can buy you: half of all Americans refuse to even recognize the greatest threat the nation faces.
Hat tip to @politico's The Long Game newsletter.
Read 5 tweets
20 Nov
You should immediately mistrust any linear projection of positive climate impact, such as "Alaskan agriculture will benefit from warming temperatures."

(mini-rant)

[image:flickr.com/photos/baggis/…] Image
First, tho models are improving, there's always the chance that specific, long-term local impacts may work out differently than expected, for complex reasons.

"Our model indicates temperatures will rise" is different that knowing, for sure, that temperatures will rise steadily.
Second, variability is at least as important as trend. If nine years out of ten there are warmer conditions, but the other year there are unprecedented and catastrophic floods, the net result is not a gain for farmers.
Read 9 tweets
20 Nov
This is a fine piece of climate journalism, focusing on efforts to hoard the future by buying up supplies of cobalt, a mineral critical for making a number of low-carbon technologies.

Geopolitics in the planetary crisis.

nytimes.com/2021/11/20/wor…
I discuss these sorts of geopolitical changes in this podcast.

alexsteffen.substack.com/p/the-planetar…
Amos Hochstein, State Department senior adviser for global energy security, calls access to solar panels & EV batteries "a national security imperative."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(