A week ago we made a prediction on the number of weekly test to come, a SUPPOSEDLY very random number, relaying on lots of Epidemic high chance events: vaccination, tracing, spread, symptomatic suspicious
So hard to give a number IF Pandemic related
...
So hard to give a number IF Pandemic related
...
https://twitter.com/plaforscience/status/1463156121326309395?t=JKMi4G_zfGH5f0u-9v4pdQ&s=19
We nailed it
Why? Are we THAT smart to identify ALL Pandemic parameters and get The Number?
We maybe are, but after studying hard what we REALLY master is political intentions thru proper parameter understanding
We understand Manipulation enough to foresee it
It's happening now
Why? Are we THAT smart to identify ALL Pandemic parameters and get The Number?
We maybe are, but after studying hard what we REALLY master is political intentions thru proper parameter understanding
We understand Manipulation enough to foresee it
It's happening now
Let me zoom, because prediction is so exact that some days points both series overlap completely
We may be the MOST lucky people around OR there's an INTENTIONAL PATTERN of growth testing that we could interpret and expose
And I've the feeling we'll keep being lucky
Wanna bet?
We may be the MOST lucky people around OR there's an INTENTIONAL PATTERN of growth testing that we could interpret and expose
And I've the feeling we'll keep being lucky
Wanna bet?
By now test increases are producing rising Incidences at a controlled pace
In 1 month, growing from 497K to 850K weekly testb had turned IR14 ~50 in a "concerning" ~200, traveling the NARROW path of the MoreTest/MoreCases politically pre-chosen stairs
Naked MANIPULATION
In 1 month, growing from 497K to 850K weekly testb had turned IR14 ~50 in a "concerning" ~200, traveling the NARROW path of the MoreTest/MoreCases politically pre-chosen stairs
Naked MANIPULATION
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
