This should be all over the front pages. The government's terminating our right to protest, through amendments sneaked into the Police Bill at the last minute.
It's the biggest assault on democracy in 70+ years, and hardly anyone seems to know.
My column theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
Obviously, the Free Speech Union and all the other Freedom Warriors of the right are up in arms about this massive truncation of our liberties.
It's amazing isn't it, that they get so wound up about what students say, or about having to wear face masks, but say nothing about the biggest attack on civil liberties in the UK for at least 70 years. You could almost imagine that the only freedoms they believe in are their own
Good grief. This afternoon, the Home Office just slipped even more amendments into the Police Bill - too late for proper parliamentary scrutiny. They include this one, clearly aimed at @XRebellionUK.
They are shutting down our freedoms, in batches.
You need to understand what this means. It means criminalising all effective protests, or pickets, or any other kind of action, on roads, railways, ports, airports, oil refineries, printing presses and other such, unspecified "key infrastructure". These are dictators' powers.
The scale of what we're on the brink of losing is scarcely imaginable. Priti Patel proposes to remove freedoms we have taken for granted for generations. Freedoms that are the wellspring of democracy.
First they came for the greens ....
Follow @killthebill_1 and find out when new protests are planned. If we don't protest before this bill is passed, we'll be hard-put to do so afterwards.
Where's the bloody media?
BBC?
Anyone?
Are you just going to sit this one out?
Where's the Labour Party?
Why aren't they shouting from the rooftops about this?
The government is deliberately slipping this under the radar. It's attempting to avoid parliamentary and media scrutiny by dropping amendments into the bill AFTER it has been debated. Not just any amendments: the biggest truncations of our freedoms in living memory.
This afternoon saw the second batch of amendments sneaked into the bill, and they include arguably the worst yet: the sweeping shutdown of protest where it counts most.
Parliament should be in uproar.
The press should be in uproar.
We should be in uproar.
You know all those documentaries you've watched about a dictator's path to power?
You know there's always the bit where you think: "Why didn't people do something? They could have stopped him while there was still time"?
That's the bit we're at.
At the beginning of any slide towards authoritarianism, you'll see justifications like this. Demonise an outgroup, pretend the new laws will apply only to them, portray the measures as necessary to clean up society.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
When you count the 250,000 believed to disposing of waste illegally, the networks ripping off the elderly and vulnerable, the money launderers in the City, the modern slavery ops in agriculture, beauty salons etc, how much of the UK workforce is engaged in criminal activity?
What we're witnessing in this country is almost complete regulatory collapse, driven by successive governments slashing what they call "red tape", alongside massive reductions in the budgets of regulatory agencies, whose monitoring and enforcement capacity has fallen off a cliff.
"Leave it to the market", they say. But when you leave the market to regulate itself, those who prosper are the spivs, the corner-cutters, the chancers and the outright criminals. Deregulation allows them to undercut their more conscientious competitors.
Misinformation on matters of public health kills people.
This is what happened when tobacco companies denied or downplayed the dangers of smoking.
This is what’s happening today, as unvaccinated people struggle for breath in intensive care units.
Thread/
Disease control measures are matters of political choice, and it is entirely legitimate to debate them. We can argue over how best to balance freedom from the disease with freedom from the disruptions and curtailments used to contain it.
But we must do so without spreading misinformation. False claims, ranging from “the virus is a hoax” to “the vaccines are untested” or “the vaccines are more dangerous than the disease”, are lethal. Those who spread them contribute to the deaths of others.
I’ve read Paul Kingsnorth’s anti-vaccine essay on Substack, and I suspect it might contribute to quite a few deaths. Why? Because his writing is elegant and powerful, but some of his facts are simply wrong.
Here's a very small sample:
Thread/
Ireland “has the highest vaccination rate in Western Europe”.
No, Portugal, Spain and Italy have higher rates, while the Netherlands, France and Finland have roughly equal rates. ourworldindata.org/covid-vaccinat…
Ireland has “some of the highest covid infection rates in Western Europe”
No, its rates are more or less in the middle: ourworldindata.org/coronavirus/co…
Congratulations to Ruth Tingay's brussel sprout on becoming an Accredited Game Shot. We believe this might be the first occasion on which a brussel sprout has achieved this distinction. Its accredition is all the more impressive given @Gameandwildlife's *rigorous* checking system
The thorough testing Ruth's brussel sprout underwent to achieve this qualification is proof that @Gameandwildlife is ABSOLUTELY NOT a bullshit front for the shooting lobby. It is a highly respectable body upholding the most rigorous standards of brussel sprout certification.
Here’s my column on the huge but scarcely-known scandal of the UK’s illegal waste mafias. In hiding, burying and burning millions of tonnes of dangerous rubbish, they are poisoning our land, water and air. But the government looks the other way. theguardian.com/commentisfree/…
PS: it's not just about fly-tipping. In fact that's just the visible, er, tip of the problem. We're talking about huge, organised, illegal dumps, all over the country.
What are advertised as independent "man with van" operations are often in reality members of major criminal syndicates, shifting industrial quantities of waste to secret dumps. The four governments of the UK, and their regulatory agencies, are turning a blind eye.
It's the promise that instills obedience: work hard, be smart, and one day you too will drown in money. Then you'll be happy.
But extreme universal wealth is
a. politically impossible: great wealth depends on exploitation.
b. ecologically impossible
c. no formula for happiness.
The promise of capitalism, universal wealth, cannot be fulfilled.
The purpose of this promise is to buy our consent. We obey because we believe we are temporarily embarrassed millionaires. One day it'll be our turn.
It's time to stop believing this fairytale, and stop obeying.