Just because a word, term or a phrase was not cited; this does not mean that the concept behind isn't existent.

When we say Allah is Ahad with all His attributes, of course we have derived this from the Qur'an. Allah does not and cannot share a meaning, Kayfiyyah, attribute
action and many more with the creation. This is why the Maturidi and Ash'ari scholars emphasise on the point regarding Tawhīd, that one must acknowledge that Allah is ONE in every aspect. If Allah were to even share 0.001% in any aspect, with His creation, this would
also mean that Allah is still not completely different from His creation and His creation is not completely different from Him.

ليس كمثله شيئ

Nothing is like Him.

So if you apply the meanings of creation to Allah, how are you negating similarity in an entity?
If Allah shares something with the creation, then this something of Allah and the creation belongs to the same specie since it is of the same category.

This is all solely based upon the Qur'an Aayaat.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Abu Yusuf

Abu Yusuf Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @truthunveilled

5 Dec
Part 2 of response to brother Muhamad (🧵)

In the issue of Imam Muhammad's statement, the Sifāt are derived from the Qur'an and Sunnah. Hereby, another principal needs mentioning (I also slightly touched upon this before).
- The Sifāt of Allah have different levels of Shubhah, some contain more ambiguity than others. Yet, all are Mutashabih. For example, the Sifaat Aqliyyah are more easily known due to the fact that they are attributes which can not only be known by the Qur'an and Sunnah, rather
they can be known by mere intellect.

For example, the sifah of qudrah. If Allah had no ability, then we would exist. Yet again, we do not know what this attribute actually is while we are clearer about knowing what Allah would carry out with this attribute due to the clearer
Read 23 tweets
5 Dec
Response to brother Muhamad (🧵)

-What is Tafweedh?

Shaykh Sayf Al Asri writes in his book, Al Qawl At Taman, summarised:

1- To affirm the what has reached us through the Shariah

2- Negate Tashbih

3- Consign the complete meaning of the reality (Ma'na Al Kulli Al haqiqi) to
Allah. (Of the Sifah) By this we mean the meaning that competes the defintion of the attribute, just like when we say about a hand's Ta'reef:

A part of a body, which can be found at the end of an arm (Ta'rif)which can be used for holding, gripping, moving and touching (Tahdid)
The definition of Ta'rif is a complete definition which tells us exactly what something is, this is known as ,المعنى الكلي الحقيقي.

So the in regards to a hand, المعنى الكلي الحقيقي of it is known as a body part.

This applies to,

An ants Hand, a clocks hand and a human.
Read 26 tweets
4 Dec
Now let us analyse this statement.

The Jahmiyyah negated the Sifah Yadan from Allah. Therefore, they negated/distorted the Quranic wording by saying Yad *is* xyz.

The fact that Imam Tirmidhi mentions, they say 'Allah did not create Adam with his yadayy' is
a direct distortion of the quranic text. What do Ahlus Sunnah say?

Ahlus Sunnah do not touch upon the Sifaat of Allah and leave them as they are, and pass them on as they came without explanation (of the Sifah) without kayf.

In contrast to this person who is translating the Quranic texts and is doing Tahrif of the attributes of Allah by
Read 7 tweets
18 Jun
ALLAH CAN SETTLE ON A FLY?

Uthmān bin Sa'īd ad-Dārimī (d. 280) mentions in his 'Radd 'alā al Marīsī':

ولو قدشاء لاستقر على ظهر بعوضة فاستقلتْ به بقدرته ولطفه ربوبيته، فكيف على عرش عظيم؟
„If he [Allah] willed, he would have settled upon the back of a mosquito, thereafter it [mosquito] could take a hold of him [meaning fly him away] by His power and kindness of lordship. So how would [it be with Allah] on the throne?“
ImageImage
Read 4 tweets
4 Jun
Misconceptions of Istighathah and Tawassul - Part 1

[Thread]
Misapplying Qur'anic verses-

One of their arguments is that, as the Qur'an says, the idolators believe in Allah and believe that He is the one Who created the heavens and the earth, but despite this, they worship idols and deify them. They say that Muslims who
believe in Tawassul and Istighāthah are no different to these idolators. The truth is however, that there are three key differences between these idolators and Muslims who believe in Tawassul and Istighathah:
Read 14 tweets
30 May
Weak narrations in Kitab al Tawhid of Ibn Abdal Wahhab

Some Examples of Hadith Graded Weak by Nasir Al-Din Al-Albani as Found in the Pseudo-Salafi Aqida Text Kitab Al-Tawhid of Muhammad ibn Abdal Wahhab
Forget fada’il al-a’mal, what follows are some examples of Hadith considered weak by ‘Shaykh’ Al-Albani found in the Salafi ‘Aqida text of Muhammad Ibn Abdul Wahhab – Kitab Al-Tawhid:
1. He cites in Chapter 1: The Virtue of At-Tawhid and what Sins it Expiates

Abu Sa’eed AI-Khudri narrated that Allah’s Messenger said,

“Musa (Moses) said: ‘O my Lord, teach me something by which I can remember You and supplicate to You…..”
Read 19 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(