Tyler Black, MD Profile picture
Dec 3, 2021 16 tweets 5 min read Read on X
Full Subgroup Analysis, US Suicides 2020
-=-=-= LONG = THREAD =-=-==-

2020's effect on suicide can now be analysed thanks to @CDCgov at the yearly level. Very shortly I'll be able to look monthly as well.

This is the whole US population, but we can now do subgroups. /1
The big headline: Children 10-14 did NOT have a significant increase in suicides. It was well within expected rate variability. Error bars shown.

Because of small #'s, the rate changes can be drastic.

The 2020 increase was less than '00, '04, '07, '09, '13, '14, '17 and '18 /2
In other words, no evidence that the "lockdown" phase of the pandemic caused more child suicides, and no evidence that 2020 was associated with a significant increase in child suicides. /3
For men, 2020 saw a decrease (-2.2%), continuing the decrease seen in 2019. /4
For women, 2020 saw a much larger decrease (-8.3%). /5
It's the 2nd largest change in female suicide rates in the US in 50 years! /6
Hey remember when all those American outlets picked up the news that suicides "increased for women in Japan?" Thousands of stories. This data about women in the US has been out a month, how many stories have you seen? Yay, media. /7
I'll now break things down by race, and for comparison's sake I am keeping the Y axis the same (0 to 30 suicides per 100,000), so you can also compare racial rates to each other. /8
(Non-Hispanic) White Americans had a very large decrease in suicide rates, the largest seen in 21 years. White women had a much larger decrease (-10%) than the men (-3%). /9
Indigenous (CDC Alaska Native or American Indian) people had a small increase in suicide rates in 2020, and the gender difference here was significant. The diff b/w white (-4.6%) & Indigenous (+6%) is quite large, and I feel represents a significant difference as well. /10
It should be noted that Indigenous suicide counts may be underestimated due to procedural issues with death coding, so this rate might be even higher.

The gender difference between Indigenous men (+5%) and women (-4%) was large. /11
(Non-Hispanic) Black Americans had an increase in the suicide rate in 2020, again separating strongly (9% difference) from white Americans. The rate increase was not as high as in many years.

Black women had a small decrease (-3%) while Black men had an increase (+8%) /12
Asian Americans (CDC: "Asian American or Pacific Islander) had a decrease of about 10%, and there was no significant gender differences. /13
I cannot reconcile a discrepancy in the CDC Rapid release for 2020 (which has Asian American 2019 deaths at 1342, and CDC wonder at 1548.) Because I trust CDC Wonder more, and know how to use it, I used this number, but it might have exaggerated the drop in 2020. /14
Hispanic Americans had a slight increase in suicide rates in 2020, and there was a large gender discrepancy, with men having an increase (+5%) and women having a decrease (-7%). This is the largest gender divide, by race. /15
The top line is reassuring for a "large pandemic effect", but there is evidence (and in a month I will be able to dive deeper) that there were significant racial differences between white and Asian (decreased) and Black, Indigenous, and Hispanic Americans (increased).

Fin. /16

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Tyler Black, MD

Tyler Black, MD Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @tylerblack32

Nov 19
Battling Election Misinformation
Part 2: "The Mandate"

Contrary to media/republican pronouncements, the election of Donald Trump was one of the narrowest (by popular vote, +1.73%) in history, with only 7 elections since 1800 being narrower.

/1Image
In fact, if we look at the margin of victory when we include all eligible voters, Trump wins with 31.3% of the voting population, compared to Harris' 30.2% and 1% going to other candidates. 37.4% did not vote.

If we only include voters, Trump wins 50.03% to 49.97%

/2Image
When we look at the electoral college results, Trump won 58% of available electoral college votes. This would rank his election 41st out of 57 elections since 1800.

/3Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 15
"[AIDS] is not being caused by a virus. It's not a virus... These people are dying because of 'poppers'... they were people who were part of a gay lifestyle... "

"This is not a viral disease, but it's a disease that is environmental."

- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr

/1Image
Chemicals in water are causing trans kids: "A lot of the problems we see in kids... are coming from chemical exposures, including a lot of the sexual dysphoria that we’re seeing."

- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr

/2Image
Wifi radiation causes autism, allergies, asthma, eczema: “I think it degrades your mitochondria and it opens your blood-brain barrier,”

- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr

/3Image
Read 7 tweets
Nov 7
🧵Battling Antivax Disinfo🧵
Vaccination did NOT increase cancer deaths.

Here I took the 6 deadliest cancers (all 5 survival rates under 50%) in a highly vaccinated population (25-54), and we can see ZERO evidence of vaccine-related cancer deaths, all the way to May 2024.

/1Image
If i move ages to 55+, we see the same thing, and we are now looking at a lot of deaths from these extremely aggressive cancers, so this isn't some underpowered stuff here. There is NO evidence that deadly cancers have increased due to vaccination.

None.

/2Image
If we take all ages 5+ and look for until May 2024, we see no increase in these highly aggressive cancer deaths, or any cancer deaths.

/3Image
Read 8 tweets
Nov 7
The Presidential Election
Data Geekery with my interpretations

1) The Country Shifted, but More Didn't.

The final share will be ~ +1.3 to +1.5% for Trump, which is a shift of ~+5.8%.

If America was a room with 65 people in it, only 2 out of the 65 people switched shirts.

/1Image
Note: this math might seem like it doesn't work, but we have to remember to include those that voted 3rd party (1.5%ish) and those that didn't vote (about 35%).

Excluding non-voters who were eligible,
2020: 22/43 D & 20/43 R
2024: 20/42 D & 21/42 R

/2Image
In other words, the great majority of the country didn't switch, but we know there was definitely a nudge towards republican vote.

What does this mean?
The narratives about "America changing" should be very cautious, as 93% of America did not change.

/3
Read 11 tweets
Sep 3
🚨COVID-19 Vaccination saves lives and improves outcomes 🚨

In this UK study of >3 MILLION PEOPLE who vaccinated, the incidence of mental health problems was significantly reduced when a subsequent COVID-19 infection occurred.

/1Image
Looking at the totals who were infected with COVID-19, it is clear that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a ROBUST increase in mental health problems after the diagnosis.

/2 Image
This adds to the massive and still growing body of evidence that Covid 19 Vaccination was safe, effective, and extremely important especially considering that after this study, virtually everyone was infetcted with COVID-19.

/3
Read 5 tweets
Aug 29
Yet another study finding differential impacts (mostly with decrease of symptoms) on the mental health of youth comparing prepandemic to pandemic times.

The media far far far less likely to report on these now common findings.

/1


jamanetwork.com/journals/jaman…
My colleagues and I talked about this at length, that there were many reasons to be cautious about the early "expert predictions" and in fact when good evidence was considered, many so-called evidence based scientists were wrong: dire outcomes on mental health harder to find.

/2


Our '23 peer-reviewed commentary here, g despite many professionals who attacked my us for daring to suggest we interpret evidence cautiously rather than childishly reducing issues & acting like sensationalists, I am certain our publciation holds up well.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(