1/ A recent analysis and commentary directly critiques our study (Nethery et al, 2021) on planned home and birth center birth in Washington State in @greenjrnl. Some thoughts after reading ajog.org/article/S0002-… in @AJOG_thegray (long thread)
2/ ‘An immutable truth’ could have also been titled “The vast majority of US home births were ‘low risk'; Low-risk home births had better outcomes than high risk home births”. And, let's improve hospital-based care + access to hospital-midwives for high risk people.
3/ They studied 'high risk' v. 'low risk' home births using US birth certificate data.
2/ Saying “[high risk people] have no place in planned home births” in my mind, is akin to ‘telling people what to do with their bodies’ - and not useful in promoting safe, respectful maternity care.
3/ We can strongly and clearly recommend hospital birth with specific risks, but ‘telling women/birthing people what to do with their bodies’ is patriarchical - as is forced pregnancy.
Despite Canada’s universal health insurance, we do not have universal coverage of #contraception.
More effective methods like ‘the Pill’ can cost 15-40$
per month. Condoms are usually the cheapest, around $1 each, but are less effective in real-life conditions (85%). /3