Correction:
He wasn't fired for helping his brother.
He was fired for how he helped his brother, abusing his position at CNN in order to further that goal.
With political correctness these days, maybe CNN would judge some abuses differently than others, so it's possible that his helping his brother is important. But on the other hand, the core issue is still that he abused his position at CNN.
I mention this before people go off on a hot take "of course I'd stand by brother even if he was accused of heinous crimes". I certainly would -- within the bounds of ethics, though.
CNN isn't forthcoming on details, but among the things was using his various contacts to discover what other reporters were going to say and influence them. This would hurt CNN's reputation.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Older people are are more likely to vote for Trump AND to die from COVID. Rural areas have worse health care than cities and are also more likely to vote Trump.
The piece was about "disinformation" and "misinformation".
2/ The piece acknowledges this scientific flaw, but instead of reporting the age-adjusted analysis, publishes instead the unadjusted analysis that looks much worse.
3/ It also twists the numbers on the unvaccinated. The source the NPR article cites says 59% of Republican (and Republican leading) claim to have received at least one shot.
In comparison, only 50% of blacks have been vaccinated, according to the same source.
"Hawaii" is trending because of blizzard warnings. People find this surprising.
Fact check: Hawaii has blizzard/winter-storm warnings almost every winter, because it's mountain peaks are 13k feet high and the snow line is 9k feet high.
Your regular reminder that "taking the 5th" is interpreted according to your bias. It's valid when it's your side, but proof of the other side's guilt.
Congress should be investigating 1/6, because the invasion fo the capitol during presidential confirmation is a Big F***ing Deal. But at the same time, congress is partisan. Anything a Trump supporter says can and will be aggressively used against them. They should stay silent.
Of course, the simplest solution is to give him a pardon/immunity, in which case, he wouldn't be able to take the fifth.
In the previous thread, I asked a technical question about NFTs. Quickly got spam responses trying to grab my cryptocurrency private-key to steal all my coins.
It all looks up-and-up, but of course, at the bottom of the form is where you lose your coins: the 12 words are essentially the "password" that controls your wallet and what hackers want to steal your coins.
And then this simple thread gets more bots trying to do scams:
"The gun went off by itself" is the same as "I got pregnant from a toilet seat".
The inexperienced have poor trigger discipline (they put their fingers on the trigger) and wave the run around as they talk, gesturing with their hands. nytimes.com/2021/12/01/mov…
By the way, the reason experienced gun people are so uptight isn't because they are virtual signaling ("look at me, I'm so virtuous about safety"), but because they've made many mistakes or watched others make mistakes.
Sometimes it's a negligent discharge which scares the s***t out of everyone nearby. Other times it's people shouting at your for pointing the gun at them or putting your finger on the trigger instead of to the side.
Except for maybe a couple of examples, you don't want these people on an advisory committee. Instead, you want a committee of techies nominated by these people, vouching for deep technical knowledge and current first-hand, front-line experience.
CEOs and corporate officers are the worst. Their job is to promote the interests of their companies. They rightly see their position on such a board as yet another way to promote their corporate interests. This isn't evil, it's just that it's their sole job.