For the record, apropos the Government's plans to overturn court judgments, it's hard to say they're a constitutional outrage until you know what they are. We don't - and nor it seems does Government.
This stuff – the proper relationship between what lawyers call the Executive (and normal people call Ministers) and the judiciary – is quite delicate. Judges have always told Ministers they can’t do something - in the public law sphere - and Ministers have always hated it.
If the plans are for Ministers to overturn judicial rulings they don't like by going to Parliament and asking it to change the law that judges found Ministers broke, that's basically fine (examined through a formal constitutional law lens, at any rate).
If the plans are for Ministers to have some power to overturn judicial rulings without going through Parliament that's (again, examined through a formal constitutional law lens) pretty offensive and profoundly undermines the supremacy of Parliament and the rule of law.
Standing back from the detail, a few points.
First, it is significant that Ministers have briefed this out before it knows what it wants to do. I can't see any reason why they would do this otherwise than to bully judges - and encourage useful idiots to attack @GoodLawProject.
First, it is significant that Ministers have briefed this out before it knows what it wants to do. I can't see any reason why they would do this otherwise than to bully judges - and encourage useful idiots to attack @GoodLawProject.
Second, the formal constitutional law lens is only useful insofar as Ministers respect Parliament. Instead they demonstrate contempt for it - prorogation, threats to remove constituency funding, growth in delegated legislation, short timetables for vital legislation, and so on.
Third, the effect of these measures is to cause the power that is held by our only national democratic body to leach out of Parliament and into the Executive and so those two conceptions (up thread) of what Ministers might be up to blend into one.
I keep saying it but as the Government's political chickens start to come home to roost, things are going to get very ugly indeed. And what they are doing at the moment is (I think) preparing for that world with new laws on protests, voter id, election law, judicial review, etc.
I'm not going to stop and @GoodLawProject is not going to stop. But I can't pretend not to be deeply worried about what the future holds.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
