A must-read @bartongellman analysis of Trump's efforts to derail his 2020 loss and plans in the works to steal the next election. In @rickhasen's words, “We face a serious risk that American democracy as we know it will come to an end in 2024." theatlantic.com/magazine/archi…
It's dire, folks Image
Republicans are exiling leaders who averted catastrophe last time Image
And there are at least four members of SCOTUS with a budding theory that will let rogue states pull all the shenanigans they like to subvert the next election. Image
In a Boston Globe piece last year, @tribelaw and I warned about this "independent state legislature doctrine" and how it could facilitate a coup bostonglobe.com/2020/11/01/opi…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Steven Mazie

Steven Mazie Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @stevenmazie

8 Dec
At 10:00, the Supreme Court will be hearing a case that could poke another hole in the (already teetering) wall of separation between church and state: Carson v. Makin. You can listen in at this link. I'll be listening & tweeting.

supremecourt.gov
Thomas: do you have standing? These schools say they won't take state funding.

Michael Bindis, lawyer for plaintiffs: yes
Kagan: if there were only two religious schools and neither would accept the money, still there's standing?

B: stigmatic injury is still an injury, even if there is no chance of participating in the program
Read 63 tweets
1 Dec
Abortion hearing at SCOTUS starting now. 👇
Lawyer for Mississippi rises:

Roe and Casey "haunt our country".
Thomas has the first question for Scott Stewart, solicitor general of Mississippi: does it make a difference if we focus on privacy or autonomy or more specifically on abortion?
Read 102 tweets
3 Nov
We’re two hours away from gun-rights showdown at the Supreme Court.

I will be tweeting and commenting in this space during the 70-plus minute oral argument.
An interesting wrinkle: the progressive left is somewhat at odds with itself in this case. Gun control advocates oppose broadening the right to bear arms while racial-justice activists deplore the discriminatory manner in which states decide who gets to carry a concealed weapon.
The argument begins at 10 AM and you can listen via a button on the Supreme Court homepage supremecourt.gov
Read 58 tweets
2 Nov
Lots of us have been puzzled as to why SCOTUS didn’t lift the 5th circuit stay on the district-court injunction to temporarily block SB 8 when it granted cert before judgment, and why only Sotomayor dissented from that denial

After today’s hearings, it’s less puzzling.
1. The “procedural morass” (Kagan) is more troubling to more justices in US v. Texas, yet that’s the (only) case w a lower-court injunction that could be restored. The majority preferred the Whole Woman’s Health route all along.
2. Seems the majority knew they wanted to block SB 8 but didn’t know exactly how and wanted to use briefing & oral arg to sort out whom specifically to enjoin (clerks, judges, AG, private parties). Path of least resistance sounds like state clerks.
Read 4 tweets
1 Nov
Two hours from now, oral arguments begin in the twin challenges to Texas’s uniquely harsh abortion law.

i’ll be tweeting and analyzing the hearings as they unfold. You can also listen in via a button on the Supreme Court’s homepage: supremecourt.gov
The first SCOTUS case this morning is Whole Woman's Health v. Jackson, a challenge to SB 8, the Texas abortion ban, from abortion clinics and providers.

Marc Hearron, arguing against the law, is up first.
CJ Roberts begins by noting that it's the 30th anniversary of Justice Thomas's investiture. "Our heartfelt congratulations."
Read 115 tweets
30 Oct
Opening line of SG Prelogar's final brief in US v. Texas, the federal government's challenge to Texas's 6-week abortion ban: SB 8 is an affront to SCOTUS's authority.
It's a smart approach, putting the justices' very authority front and center. All nine care about preserving their power and shutting down renegade states trying to circumvent their rulings; only three care about preserving abortion rights.
Later: SB 8 is "a brazen nullification of this Court’s precedents accomplished by subverting the judicial review Congress authorized to protect the supremacy of federal law."
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(