New @JAMAInternalMed w/ @DKorenstein: #ChoosingWisely has had huge reach in shaping conversations - and efforts to reduce - #lowvaluecare. We unpacked the types and expected impact of U.S. #ChoosingWisely recommendations, w/ some surprising finds. 🧵1/ jamanetwork.com/journals/jamai…
In 2012, @ABIMFoundation @ConsumerReports launched #ChoosingWisely - asking professional societies to list low-value services to avoid. CW intentionally let docs set their own priorities to leverage their professional values, but some worried about unintended consequences. 2/
In our qualitative analysis of all 626 U.S. physician recs, most recs identified low-value imaging and lab studies in patients w/ chronic conditions or w/ risk factors alone. Few tackled (for example) visits/hospitalizations or services at end-of-life (missed opportunities?) 3/
Most recs (64%) were revenue-neutral for the society’s member physicians. Sometimes (2%), following the rec would even earn $ for member physicians. Meanwhile, the lowest-cost services (<$200 per unit) were the largest share of named services, and this share grew over time. 4/
The recommendations varied widely along 4 dimensions of impact: The named low-services had varying $ and size of affected populations. Promisingly, 45% of identified low-value services had high direct harm potential and 62% had high cascade potential. 5/
Of course, recs only useful if acted on (per @betsyqcliff, multi-pronged interventions work best👇). Given how hard interventions are, we hope our analyses can inform new recs + help clinical leaders/policymakers/payers prioritize services to target. 6/ milbank.org/quarterly/arti…
Grateful for a thoughtful editorial by Niloofar Latifi @RFRedberg and Deb Grady. And to our non-Twitter coauthors: Meredith Rosenthal @HarvardHPM and Nitya Thakore @nyugrossman 7/
jamanetwork.com/journals/jamai…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ishani Ganguli MD, MPH

Ishani Ganguli MD, MPH Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @IshaniG

17 Oct 19
How common are “cascades” after incidental findings? In @JAMANetworkOpen we present our survey of US generalists (n=376 completed,RR 45%). Most had experienced cascades w/ no clinically impt outcomes yet caused harms to patients and themselves. THREAD(1/9) bit.ly/33BS7WM
99% of doctors experienced cascades, most frequently including phone calls with patients, repeated tests. Most had experienced a cascade leading to an invasive test, ED visit, or hospitalization. (2/9) w/ @greyscalespaces @TomSequist @AJMainor @CHColla @ClaireLupo @ACPinternists
Most doctors reported patient harms (incl psych, $, physical) from cascades ≥several times/year. They reported frequent harms to themselves (wasted time/effort, frustration, anxiety), especially physicians in rural settings and those reporting discomfort with uncertainty. (3/9)
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(