Priti Patel’s anti-refugee bill goes to report stage today. Here's why it breaches international law according to legal experts 👇
A THREAD 🧵
1/
Priti Patel’s anti-refugee bill is the biggest overhaul that our asylum system has seen in decades
Her plans are not only cruel and inhumane but would also violate the UK’s legal commitment to the Refugee Convention, and European Convention on Human Rights.
2/
1⃣ If someone has travelled through a safe 3rd country, the UK govt will try to not consider their claim.
This violates 1 of the key pillars of the Refugee Convention, which states that you can't penalise a refugee because they have travelled irregularly to seek protection.
3/
So, refusing to consider their claim on this basis is unlawful.
It also creates a risk that the refugee will be removed to a country from which they may then be sent back to the country of persecution. This would also breach international human rights and refugee law.
4/
2⃣The plan proposes offshore processing of refugees- like the Australian model
This model has led to severe human rights violations & by implementing this, the UK risks defying legal obligations to protect people seeking safety and safeguard their human rights.
5/
3⃣Refugees whose claim for protection is recognised but who arrived by “irregular” means would be given a less protective and secure status with far fewer rights than those resettled to the UK
6/
❌ This would go against a central premise of the Refugee Convention, which does not allow for refugees to be penalised because they were obliged to travel irregularly to seek safety.
7/
4⃣The plan proposes a new “fast-track” system for processing claims, where the government will demand that all evidence is provided at once and to a deadline.
8/
But evidence, such as an independent expert medical report, is often given later in the process, as those who have experienced trauma often need time to process and share their experiences.
9/
❌Therefore this plan would penalise people who have experienced trauma and risk sending refugees back to countries where they face torture and persecution.
10/
This unfairness constitutes a breach of international law under the Refugee Convention and the European Convention on Human Rights, which protect people fleeing torture and persecution from the risk of return
11/
5⃣ Raising the legal standard of proof that applies to an asylum claim would breach international law by creating a risk that refugees who meet the definition within the Refugee Convention will be returned to persecution.
12/
The UNHCR advises that a relatively low standard of proof should apply in view of the difficulty refugees face in evidencing the risk of persecution on return, and the implications of getting the decision wrong.
13/
This Bill will put safety out of reach for many refugees by raising that legal standard.
14/
We can't let this cruel plan become law.
Retweet this thread & email your MP for a meeting now❗
This govt has just voted in favour of the #AntiRefugeeBill during its final reading in the House of Commons.
If this bill passes into law, it will punish many people fleeing from war and persecution for trying to seek safety here.
1/
It could mean that people fleeing war & torture, are sent to off-shore prison-like camps, stripped of their rights to seek safety & may mean they can never see their families again.
2/
We may feel at odds during moments like these, but right now it's more important than ever to take action.
Most of us want an asylum system that reflects the humanity & decency we believe in. So before it passes, we need to tell this govt we don't support this cruel bill.
3/
Eduardo fled his home country after being kidnapped. Three months after he arrived in the UK seeking asylum, he was taken to Penally barracks in Wales.
THREAD
1/
“They came in the middle of the night and took us,” Eduardo says.
He was given no time to gather his possessions.
“I was so upset, scared, I had no idea what was happening.”
2/
“Everyone was so scared because Penally looks like a jail. I have never been inside a prison but it felt like one.”
“The heaters weren't working, most of the showers weren’t working and there was no soap or toilet paper most of the time.”
3/
"No one would risk death crossing the Channel if they weren't running from a terrible situation."⠀
Aydin risked everything to get to the safety of the UK. But under Priti Patel's "New Plan", many of his rights would be stripped away because he crossed the Channel by boat.
1.
Aydin is still waiting to hear if his asylum claim was successful. But even if he is successful, under Priti Patel's new plans, he could be at risk of immediate deportation at any moment. No one should have to live like this - let alone a survivor of torture.
⠀
2.
Aydin has already been through so much. In his country of origin, he fought against the eradication of the language and culture of his ethnic group in the Middle East. The price he paid was torture. He fled alone, leaving his life and family behind him.⠀