As I said in the interview, I think Downing Street are in a genuine bind. If they “come clean“ and admit there was a party, they are potentially admitting criminal offences (nobody can be sure yet if the law was broken). If they don’t, the political implications are severe.
They will also know that in the coming weeks they need public trust to impose further restrictions. People are thinking about next ones but the current ones, particularly requiring isolation for anyone coming into contact with Omicron, may be about to impact hundreds of thousands
I’m not sure how many people realise but the law was changed to compel 10 day isolation for anyone infected or in close contact with Omicron, regardless of vaccination status or age. If omicron is spreading exponentially this will quickly become a mini lockdown for 100,000s
I should point out - the legal duty is only triggered if you are contacted officially (usually by NHS Test & Trace) to tell you to isolate because of Omicron. It can't be triggered by an App ping
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I still think that the reason the Prime Minister continues to deny a "party" took place is that if he does there is a risk he is exposing the attendees to possible criminal sanctions.
There have been endless discussions on the legality of the party, and there are some potential issues around applicability of the regulations, but if I was advising Downing St (as I assume the AG has) I would advise there is a real risk of prosecution.
If the regulations applied, the key question for the police would probably be whether the party was "reasonably necessary for work".
If the Prime Minister describes it as a "party" that means the answer to the question if highly likely to be "no".
If, in the space of 10 years, politicians haven't been able to find other *true* cases to beat the Human Rights Act with, perhaps the reason is there aren't any.
Human rights laws have been hugely important in the UK and a source of real progress for many different parts of the society. I helped made this a few years ago to highlight 50 examples eachother.org.uk/50-human-right…
I initially thought I disagreed, because of the "permitted organised gatherings" requiring a risk assessment, but then Matthew pointed out (and I remembered from the time) that weirdly indoor gatherings didn't require one
But, as Matthew points out, if the gathering was a "permitted organised gathering", the individuals who were invited would not be allowed to mingle outside their households. If they did, they would be breaking the law. So in a way that makes the potential law breaches of...
“It was not a party” update:
- cheese and wine
- not socially distanced
- “business meeting”
I know I mentioned this before but this keeps bringing back the utter distress of my 7 student clients who got £10,000 fixed penalty notices for house parties. Families paying life changing £ they couldn't afford, regulators + student authorities disciplinary processes triggered