How effective are vaccines against Omicron?
Today 3 studies were posted of data on immune escape measured by reductions in "antibody neutralization titers".
We can use these to estimate VE, WITH SOME ASSUMPTIONS.
Thread based on paper w @billy_gardner_ that we'll post tomorrow
We've known since the discovery of Omicron's growth & posting of it's sequence that it has many mutations in its spike protein, & many of these affect binding of our antibodies. @jbloom_lab estimated that these would reduce binding of antibodies 20-60 fold:
We measure "neutralizing antibody titers" by determining how much we can dilute a person's sera (blood) & have it still neutralize the virus & stop it from growing in cell culture. Papers often use 50% reduction in "plaques" or "foci" as a cutoff so you'll see FRNT50 as response.
We can compare neutralizing antibody titers for two virus variants & calculate amount that a virus escapes neutralization by calculating the ratio of neutralizing antibody titers for the two variants, and express this result as an X-fold reduction in neutralizing antibody titers.
Today we got 1st actual data @sigallab on extent of neutralizing antibody escape. Live virus assay (gold standard) w/ 14 samples from 12 people suggested 41.4-fold reduction in titers, which is much higher than other virus variants. ahri.org/wp-content/upl…
But none estimate changes in VE from these results.
How much should we trust these initial results? Both studies above are relatively small.
We (@billy_gardner_ & I) gathered data on relative reductions in neutralization titers from studies that compared at least 3 variants.
We found that measurements are moderately consistent in terms of relative differences w/in a study (lines in fig are parallel), but there are huge diffs b/w studies (methods, samples, etc.), so need to have all the variants you want to compare in 1 study.
Studies above suggest a 7 - 41 fold difference, with weight leaning towards the upper end (20-40-fold reduction).
What does this mean in terms of vaccine effectiveness?
It does NOT mean a 20-40-fold reduction in VE. But...
We can estimate the reduction using data on VE for a vaccine & neutralizing antibody titers. Two papers that did this are: medrxiv.org/content/10.110… nature.com/articles/s4159…
However - these studies compared VE across vaccines, NOT across virus variants. Can we do that directly?
We used VE data from @alison_l_hill medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
for specific vaccines & variants & paired them w/ neutralizing antibody titers for vaccines & variants to estimate VEs for symptomatic disease, doc infection & hospitalization.
Here are VE for SYMPTOMATIC DISEASE & antibody neutralization fold-reductions for 4 vaccines & 4 variants. We could fit models to these data but notice empty space on graphs for >7-fold reductions - there are NO DATA. Thus we can't reliably estimate Omicron VE from these data.
Here are VE for DOCUMENTED INFECTION (symptomatic + some unknown fraction of asymptomatic infections) vs. antibody neutralization fold-reduction. Again, no data w/ >7-fold reductions so no good estimates of VE for Omicron here.
Finally, here is VE data for HOSPITALIZATION vs. antibody neutralization fold-reduction. Higher than last two endpoints (yay!) but again, no data w/ >7-fold reductions so we can't estimate VE for Omicron from these data.
(ps: Beta VE is highly uncertain for all endpoints)
So what can we do? If we are willing to make a BIG ASSUMPTION that differences in neutralizing antibody titers ACROSS VACCINES & VARIANTS are valid for comparisons ACROSS VARIANTS, then we can do it b/c we have a much higher range of neutralizing antibody titers across vaccines.
Here are VE for HOSPITALIZATION vs antibody titers relative to original variant (WT) w/ all data from 4 vaccines & 4 variants on same graph; data spans 13.7-fold antibody titer range; predicted VE 89.6% (88.6-90.4) to 98.4% (98.2-98.7).
VE for HOSPITALIZATION is very robust!
For symptomatic disease & ALL infections we can use relationships in our recent paper (updated fig below) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
These data span 45-fold range of neutralizing antibody ratios which ~=Omicron-fold reduction. So what can we say?
A fresh Moderna VE (i.e. 1-2 weeks post dose 2) for SYMPTOMATIC DISEASE was ~95% for original WT virus. w/ Omicron, assuming ~40 fold reduction, VE ~52% (35-60%), close to China's Coronavac vaccine.
Similarly, fresh Pfizer WT VE ~93% w/ Omicron: EXTRAPOLATION: 30% (24-37).
What can we do to counter Omicron immune evasion? Get a booster, especially if 3-6 mo from vaccination!
In same paper medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
we show 3rd dose Pfizer boosts waned Ab 26x! 3rd Moderna boosts waned Ab 13x, but starts higher, so ~same! See panel B, red triangles.
Summary
Omicron's 30-40-fold reduction in neut. antibody titers will lead to ESTIMATED:
~10-14% reduction in VE HOSPITALIZATION
~40-60% reduction in SYMPTOMATIC INFECTION
Both of these can be mostly mitigated by 3rd dose booster.
Biggest Caveats:
-Indirect approach using antibody titers as correlate of VE
-Variation among vaccines can approximate variation among variants
-40-fold reduction sometimes required extrapolation, which is always dangerous
Clarification 1: impact of 3rd doses on antibody titers are relative to waned titers. So:
Waned Pfizer Ab + 3rd dose + Omicron ~= waned Pfizer Ab = ~60% vs all infections.
So very important to boost, but doesn't fully restore Ab to fresh 2d levels.
A 30x reduction for 2nd dose sera but only 2.6x for 3rd dose sera. Confusing right? Ratios also smaller for other viruses.
This difference *could* be due to antibody maturation. It's been longer since vaccination for 3rd dose people & over time antibodies become more robust to mutations: doi.org/10.1038/s41564…
It could also be due to variation among individuals incl. exposure b/w 2nd & 3rd doses.
Looking forward to additional datasets to sort out differences among results in reductions in antibody titers & first direct VE estimates. Rapid Omicron spread already documented in Europe means VE estimates could come soon.
Correction: In Summary I left out VE. It should read:
Summary
Omicron's 30-40-fold reduction in neut. antibody titers will lead to ESTIMATED:
~10-14% reduction in VE HOSPITALIZATION
~40-60% reduction in VE SYMPTOMATIC INFECTION
Both of these can be partly mitigated by 3rd doses.
Add: To folks wanting to calculate a waned VE, I purposely didn't report VE for waned mRNA vaccination w/ Omicron b/c that would be 9-fold x 40-fold = 360-fold reduction & that's way outside data. Suffice to say that VE for both Hospitalization & Symp disease would be quite low.
So far, live virus assays show more reduction in neutralization titers which is not always the case (rt top fig- but unpaired comparison):doi.org/10.1093/cid/ci…
Clarification: VE estimates above all assume no intrinsic difference in omicron in terms of disease severity or that any diffs fall along line of other variants used to estimate relationships (alpha, beta, gamma, Delta). If omicron is inherently more or less severe all bets off.
Paper has been submitted to medRxiv. Until it posts, it's available here: drive.google.com/file/d/1_KMMZf…
Let me know if you have trouble access the file. Code & data link in paper.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
How to mislead in science: hide raw data in supp material (SM).
Just had a dept-wide reading group of a recent Science paper on latitudinal/temperature trends in predation pressure (10.1126/science.abc4916). Paper claims simple clean patterns (fig) but where are the data???
Panel A (L) in main text. Raw data & regional analysis in SM. Paper makes simplistic & general claim: predation increases w/ Temp. But data tell v different story. Instead of clear increase in Bait Consumption w/ Temp, pattern is absent in 2/4 region, strong in 1/4, weak in 1/4.
Same for Fig 2B. Fig in main text (L) shows clean pattern. Actual data (R) show that pattern is mostly just in 1 type of animal (solitary tunicates) while other taxa show opposite pattern (Enc Bryozoans) or no pattern at all (most other taxa).
COVID-19 vs Shark attack
There was a shark attack yesterday where I free dive frequently (abc7news.com/lovers-point-b…). A friend asked what's more dangerous, COVID-19 or swimming/free diving with sharks in the ocean?
Just for fun, here's a rough calculation.
tl;dr COVID-19 by a mile.
Chance of COVID-19 infection? Depends on many things: occupation, household size, behavior, exposure of household members etc. But in US roughly 60% of US has been exposed in last 2 years (webmd.com/lung/news/2022…). So crude estimate of yearly chance of infection 37%.
Chance of COVID-19 death given infection? Depends on age; for me, about 0.72%, pre-vaccination for the original SARS-CoV-2 variant.
So chance of infection & death ~1 in 375 pre-vaccination and 10-50x lower now (variant, vaccine doses, time since booster) medrxiv.org/content/10.110…
Why would Amazon workers vote against union & why aren't union dues progressive like taxes (i.e. lowest for lowest income)?
I've read several stories (nytimes.com/2022/05/02/tec…) about workers at 2nd Staten Island plant voting strongly against union but none of the articles say why.
Union dues would be $5/week for full time employees (amazonlaborunion.org), so if earning $15/hr, this is 0.33 hrs/week or 0.8% of salary which seems pretty cheap, & is even less than some large unions (e.g. Teamsters = 2.5 hr/mo or ~0.55hr/wk).
If union negotiated a 1% increase in pay that'd pay for union dues. That seems like a pretty low bar for a goal & doesn't include negotiating for better working conditions, etc. What are other reasons not to unionize or is it simply b/c of known cost & unknown benefits?
Florida Manatees: doomed to extinction or actually doing pretty well?
A simple data analysis story.
Some of you may have seen this article in NYTimes 10d ago: nytimes.com/2022/04/09/us/…
The article suggests Florida manatees are on their way out with quotes like this:
The perilous status of manatees is supported by claims like:
"In all of last year, 1,100 Florida manatees died, a record."
The article does acknowledge in some places manatees are doing better. But the overall tone is one of despair for a species on its way to extinction.
#epitwitter
Need help w/ UK seroprevalence data
I recall previously seeing estimates of for SARS-CoV-2 infection for UK, but now I can only find estimates for exposure to spike protein which is infection OR vaccination (fig from ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…)
but...
I want seroprevalence for infection so need data on antibodies to nucleocapsid protein or other non-spike protein. Does this exist?
I also can't find info on the response rate for survey. This page has response rates, but they are old (from July 2020) & they are very low (<15%). What is current response rate for serosurvey? ons.gov.uk/peoplepopulati…
US COVID-19 deaths US >2000/day & continue to rise.
I can't help but wonder if focus on Omicron's mildness contributed to size of surge & deaths occurring now.
Difference in severity was small relative to higher infectiousness. Latter should have been singular focus of messaging.
Obviously it would have been far worse if omicron had been as severe as Delta. But focus on mildness of Omicron by scientists, media, government, CDC, etc. contributed to people being less safe than they should have & now thousands are dying/day & many more w/ long covid
Biggest failure, in my opinion, was lackluster efforts to roll out 3rd dose boosters, which played huge role in much smaller impact of Omicron on deaths in UK & elsewhere.
In US, many scientists argued against need for boosters, possibly b/c of global vaccine equity issues.