Good morning everyone - it's #stlboa ward map perfection day! Live-tweet coming later. I didn't actually eat my Wheaties, but my husband promised me Gioia's for lunch, so I've got that going for me.
(Side note, it still feels really weird to say husband.)
Anyways ... here's a rundown of some of the key things as the alders move to reduce their ranks from 28 to 14.
City counselor Sheena Hamilton released an opinion yesterday that the map, in her opinion, passes constitutional muster. She notes that while it would be possible to draw a majority AAPI or Hispanic ward, it would not be compact.
The map came out of the legislation committee on November 22 by a vote of 9-1-1 with one abstaining. The roll call was as follows:
Ayes: Davis, Vaccaro, Coatar, P. Boyd, Muhammad, Martin, Clark Hubbard, Vollmer, Pres. Reed
Nays: J. Boyd
Present: Middlebrook
Abstain: Navarro
If everyone holds their vote, that means there are just six more aye votes needed to eventually send the map to @saintlouismayor.
Aside from giving first round approval to the map today, alders also have to number the wards. This is important, because w/ the reduction, odd wards will have to run twice in 2 years.
I don't know what the process will be for placing the numbers on the map, but @LewisReedSTL has promised it will be public and open.
Reducing the wards also means that incumbents will have to run against each other somewhere. With the caveat that some of the lines aren't clear, these are the matchups I have.
Ward A: Bosley, Page
Ward B: Middlebrook, J. Boyd, P. Boyd
Ward C: Tyus, Evans, Todd
The other key thing about the ward reduction - because every ward runs in 2023, there is no fallback for alders who want to seek higher office. That's important for those who might want to be board president.
An absolutely wonky addendum to the previous info dump.
Based on the #stlboa's own rules, they might run into a timing issue to get the bill to the mayor on Friday.
After a bill is perfected (get 1st round approval), it goes to something called the Committee on Engrossment.
Ordinarily, a bill can go on the 3rd reading (final passage) calendar at the next scheduled meeting of the board - except when there's been amendments.
Genuinely not sure what's on tap today, so I'll tweet as we get there. Possibilities include first round budget approval and final passage of a vote to reverse the residency requirement.
.@PresReed's bill on privatizing @flystl is on 2nd reading today.
BREAKING - Cole County judge Richard Callahan (former U.S. atty for EDMO), has blocked the enforcement of parts of #MO photo ID law. bit.ly/2OgAhW7
Callahan - "the Court finds, with one important exception, that the voting scheme adopted by the General Assembly is within its constitutional prerogative."
That one exception is the affidavit you had to sign if using non-photo ID like utility bill.
Essentially, Callahan says, the language of the affidavit makes it sound like you HAVE to have a photo ID to vote when in reality, you can vote using non-photo ID and signing the affidavit.
SO.