Byzantine Emporia Profile picture
Dec 10, 2021 14 tweets 5 min read Read on X
On 19 September 1918, General Allenby launched an offensive to break through Ottoman lines in northern Palestine, the Battle of Megiddo.

He was inspired by Thutmose III's conquest of Canaan, in which the pharaoh attacked from an unexpected direction in a battle of the same name.
The Jezreel Valley is a broad, fertile plain that runs through modern Israel, connected at the northwest via the Kishon River to the sea, and in the southeast to the Jordan. In ancient times, it sustained a large population and was an important center of political power.
In 1457 BC, Thutmose III marched out to quell a revolt by his Syrian and Canaanite vassals. They had massed their forces in the Jezreel, protected from the coastal plain to the south by the Mount Carmel range.
The rebels had concentrated around the strong hillfort of Megiddo, which guarded the southwestern edge of the valley. But they also sent out detachments to block the main approaches through the mountains.
There were two principal routes into the Jezreel. The easiest route ran east into the southern end of the valley; a more difficult route ran to the north.

But there was also a third route, wide enough for only one man to pass at a time, which led straight to Megiddo itself.
Thutmose’s scouts informed him that the central route was unguarded, so he took a gamble and took the more direct but more hazardous approach. He took the rebels completely by surprise, routed their army, stormed Megiddo, and subdued the region.
Thirty-four centuries later, Edmund Allenby found himself in a similar position as he pushed up from Egypt into Ottoman Palestine.

Geography is unchanging, and presents the same military difficulties across the ages. In this case: how to break through the Mount Carmel range.
Allenby realized that the key to success was cutting off the two defending armies from their headquarters at Nazareth. But the mountains of Palestine posed the same problem as the trenches of the Western Front: how to exploit the initial assault to break through?
The key to Nazareth lay in reaching the Jezreel Valley as quickly as possible. So as soon as the initial British assault broke through the Ottoman forces in the coastal plain, Allenby sent his cavalry through the same valley Thutmose took near Megiddo.
It was a brilliant success, and collapsed the entire Ottoman lines. The Seventh Army under Mustafa Kemal—the future Ataturk—was in an untenable position around Nablus and withdrew, yielding the entire Jordan Valley to the British and opening the road to Damascus.
There was very little fighting around Megiddo itself, but Allenby named the battle after that location because it played such an important role in his ultimate success. There was also another reason, however....
Geography is a constant throughout history, and the same factors that made Megiddo important to Thutmose III and Edmund Allenby have made it important to many others—there have been several battles of Megiddo. The battlefield was so important, in fact….
....that it was prophesied to be the site of the final apocalyptic battle in the Book of Revelations, where it is called Armageddon—“Har-Megiddo”. Allenby, not shy about burnishing his reputation, chose the name for its Biblical overtones.
A great discussion of Megiddo in the Bronze Age with @digkabri, the excavator of the site, in which he mentions Thutmose's influence on Allenby:
pod.co/experts-in-his…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Byzantine Emporia

Byzantine Emporia Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @byzantinemporia

Aug 18, 2024
Ottoman borders in the 15th century looked a lot like Byzantium during its ascent: for similar geographic reasons they faced an ongoing state of war along their eastern frontier. But once they turned their full attention to the problem, they solved it much more dramatically.🧵
Image
Anatolia was the Ottomans’ base of power, where they welded together the Turkic beyliks that formed in the wake of Byzantine retreat. This was a gradual process, and by the 15th c. several retained varying degrees of independence.

Image
One of these was the Karamanids in southern Anatolia, who often tried to expand this during periods of Ottoman weakness or disunity. One of these attempts came in 1444, when the so-called Crusade of Varna was attacking their Balkan possessions. Image
Read 21 tweets
Jul 8, 2024
Quotes are from a superb pair of essays by @Scholars_Stage, Luttwak's book on Byzantium gives a similar misreading of their strategic culture (but cast in a positive light). In truth, the Byzantines were very eager to fight, diplomacy and bribes were only used as stop-gaps when occupied on another front, and the caution advised by their military manuals was tactical and operational—not strategic.
@Scholars_Stage On the first point, it was a matter of simple geography. They campaigned aggressively whenever threatened, but their two primary theaters were separated by an enormous distance.
The caution urged on frontier commanders by the manuals (e.g. On Skirmishing) has to be interpreted in light of the larger strategic picture. Prematurely forcing a battle risked leaving all of Anatolia exposed before the imperial army could mobilize.
Read 4 tweets
Apr 4, 2024
When the Seljuks arrived in the Middle East, they played a very similar role to the Franks in Dark Age Europe: protectors of an enfeebled religious authority and the enforcers of orthodoxy.🧵 Image
The Franks who expanded into Gaul in the 6th century were unique among the barbarian kingdoms of Western Europe. Their king Clovis converted to Nicene Christianity, aligning himself with the surviving elite of the post-Roman West. Image
This stood in contrast to the Visigoths of Spain, Burgundians of southeast Gaul, Ostrogoths of Italy, and Vandals of North Africa, all of whom practiced Arianism and remained aloof of their subject populations. Image
Read 12 tweets
Feb 10, 2024
It took a decade for a 17th-century financial crisis to travel from Spain to China.

The Spanish Crown suffered a pair of fiscal disasters in 1627-28 which eventually forced it to cut silver exports to the Far East, hammering a Ming China already teetering on the precipice. Image
The flood of New World silver into Asian markets in the 1500s crushed the value of metal currency, but also supercharged trade as new markets were opened for exports. The effect was the same from Syria to China.
By the second half of the century, the Far East was receiving about a third of the Spanish Crown’s silver (already 80% of the world’s supply).

Adding to this, new mines in Japan began producing large quantities in the middle of the century. Image
Read 9 tweets
Jan 3, 2024
The Spartans drilled.

This is a ridiculous reading of the sources mentioned, and it neglects a few other important ones.

Thread.
To start with, one thing he gets right is that the classical Greeks deprecated the value of individual skill at arms—if anything, that would detract from their willingness to hold the line. Here’s a wonderful passage from the Spartan poet Tyrtaeus, who is mentioned: Image
Maintaining formation—παρ᾿ ἀλλήλοισι μένοντες—is seen as the chief martial virtue. So how did they learn to do it?

Let’s look at the quote from Laches. Nicias suggests that young men should prepare for war by training at arms.Image
Read 21 tweets
Oct 19, 2023
Easy to underestimate how thorough the breakdown of a centralized system can be. To put it in modern perspective, here's what it takes just to get the right 𝘸𝘢𝘷𝘦𝘭𝘦𝘯𝘨𝘵𝘩 for the lasers in lithography machines used to etch the most advanced microchips (from "Chip War")...


Image
Image
Image
That's a staggering amount of material, intellectual, and economic infrastructure required just to sustain one part of a very complicated process. Sustaining that infrastructure depends in turn on maintaining the process. If any one of several highly-centralized nodes is disrupted for any length of time, it becomes disproportionately more expensive and difficult to get it back online.
Systems are resilient and can recover from freak catastrophes. But anything that is likely to majorly disrupt one node is bound to introduce many other complications. Just as a hypothetical: a war over Taiwan that takes out TSMC, which manufactures 90% of advanced chips...
Read 10 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(