Re: Kickstarter blockchain announcement - I received an interesting email laying out what may be behind this. Author requested to remain anonymous, but here are the details from them:
🧵:
Europe has a new law in place that will place some restrictions on crowdfunding platforms. This has not been widely reported, mainly because it is a European issue. Source (French): compte-pro.com/crowdfunding-l…
To summarize: within 1 year, crowdfunding sites will have to have approval from the European Union. Also, they will be responsible in case of failure of a project, and will have to pay back in this case.
The law also imposes a limit on the amount of money raised by a single project owner (5 million euros in one year, which can be a problem for some companies like Mythic games, which exceed this amount). (This is a simplification - it's more complex than this)
Switching to blockchain allows Kickstarter to do several things:
- decentralizing the service will allow them to bypass the European Union approval (the anonymity of the blockchain makes it impossible to know where what comes in and where what goes out).
- They will be able to keep their current operation, i.e. not being responsible in case of project failure.
- Finally, the blockchain is in fashion and it is a great opportunity to play in front of shareholders.
That's why they want to put this system in place as early as 2022, before the obligation of the European approval. Consumers will not benefit from this change. It's just Kickstarter bending the rules to avoid the European law.
Again - this is just a theory. But it seems plausible.
UPDATE: More knowledgeable folks than I have advised that the new regulation does not cover crowd-funding, but other activities (crowd equity and lending). So this theory is incorrect.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Until recently I never truly grasped that the fundamental social contract of Democracy is that the losers of elections accept the results and graciously cede power.
Board games are a critical part of teaching that lesson to children.
A short thread.
Candyland, Chutes & Ladders, and other classic first games are not about teaching strategy & tactics. They are about teaching the building blocks of games – taking turns, and being a gracious loser and winner.
And, not coincidentally, these are important societal lessons as well
Democracy is the *voluntary* adoption by those in power of rules about taking turns, winning, and losing. It is the magic circle writ large – so large perhaps, that we don’t realize we are in it until we see people who break the unwritten foundational rules.
I read the main paper from France that started the craze over hydroxychloroquine, and there are some things you should know. Here’s the paper if you’d like to read along: sciencedirect.com/science/articl…
1. Sample size was small – 26 received hydroxychlorine (hxc) and 16 were in the control group, who did not get hxc. The groups were not randomized, and were not blind. Everyone knew who was getting what.
2. If anyone was moved to the ICU they were REMOVED FROM THE STUDY. This is because the test they were doing was nasal swabs to see how much virus was in the patient (viral load). They couldn’t swab patients in the ICU.
First, I think that a lot of the differences of opinion are about terminology. Many of you said - no that's uncertainty, but it's not randomness.
In "Uncertainty In Games", Greg Costikyan argues convincingly that every game has uncertainty. If it doesn't - if the path and outcome of the game are known in advance - then it isn't a game. So just calling it "Uncertainty" is completely unhelpful.
In early 1942 many of the Allied naval forces were being diverted to the Pacific, and the German U-Boats were becoming increasingly deadly.
The British navy appointed Captain Gilbert Roberts, who had been sidelined due to tuberculosis, to head up a small team called the Western Approaches Tactical Unit, or WATU. Their mission – figure out new tactics to regain the upper hand over the U Boats.
1. I apologize for once again leaving the realm of gaming and dipping into politics, but I need to express my deep and sincere concern for the mechanism of government in the United States.
2/ Over the years many democracies have slid from true representation into defacto one party rule – what is called ‘illiberal democracy’. Hungary, Poland, and Turkey are recent examples..
3. The process is the gradual undermining of the institutions of government. And there are an alarming and increasing number of incidents that are pushing us in this direction.