The nonchalance with which too many mainstream media outlets have treated the revelations of how close the country came to a self-coup would perhaps be *somewhat* justifiable if Trump were fully ostracized from politics and society.
At this point, Trump must be considered the clear favorite to be the Republican Party’s next presidential nominee: The base wants him, GOP elites stand with him - even supposedly “moderate” ones like Nikki Haley -, Trumpism is rapidly becoming the Republican orthodoxy.
Conservative intellectuals are either all in on Trumpism (the Claremont Institute types, for instance); or claim to be loathing Trump the Man while absolutely supporting Trump the Politician who promises to shut up the Libs (the religious conservatives like Dreher, Ahmari…).
That doesn’t mean there’s no friction on the Right. The self-proclaimed nationalist conservatives are basically ready to break with the Reaganite consensus and end the fusion of traditionalism and libertarian anti-statism, no longer believing it serves their reactionary project.
And Steve Bannon wants to purge everyone who’s not unabashedly white nationalist, having no patience for any kind of even purely rhetorical / tactical adherence to the existing system - and I’m sure the far-right militias agree that it’s time to go all radical, all the time.
But none of that seems to undermine Trump’s position - at the very least, no alternative to Trump has emerged that could seriously fracture the Right. Trump is their man, Trumpism their credo. He’s the chosen vessel to deliver the victory over the despised leftist enemy.
Considering all that, it should absolute be a big freakin deal that this guy who leads the Right and dominates the Republican Party had concrete plans to stage a self-coup, fake national emergency and all, and effectively end democracy in America right there and then!
If someone can stage an assault on the system like Trump did, and continue to attack and undermine the system in every conceivable way, and then just go on to lead one of the major parties, probably become a presidential nominee once again, democracy is unsustainable.
If the institutions that are tasked with upholding democracy and sustaining a democratic political culture do not possess the strength and/or will to mount an effective defense against Trump now, it will soon be impossible to halt the accelerating slide into authoritarianism.
The Republican Party has made its choice; the conservative movement has made its choice; the American Right has made its choice: They all stand with Trump, they have chosen Trumpism over democracy.
Now everyone who prefers democracy has to make their choice too. And quickly.
It’s not just the Democratic politicians. Every newsroom has to make a choice. Every journalist has to make a choice. Everyone who has any kind of public platform has to make a choice.
America is at a crossroads. The time to choose is now.
But could it really happen here? It is happening right now.
American democracy is on the brink, and if we want to save it - want to eventually, finally realize the promise of a functioning multiracial, pluralistic democracy - we have to acknowledge that these are the stakes.
The Modern Conservative Tradition and the Origins of Trumpism
Today’s Trumpist radicals are not (small-c) conservatives – but they stand in the continuity of Modern Conservatism’s defining political project.
New piece (link in bio):
What should we call the pro-Trump forces that are dominating the American Right today? Conservatives? Reactionaries? Something else? The terminology really matters because it reflects and shapes how we think about the nature of Trumpism and how to situate it in U.S. history.
We need to distinguish between colloquial or abstract philosophical notions of what it means to be (small-c) “conservative” - and the political project that referred to itself (and was widely referred to) as the Conservative Movement in post-1950s America.
Meet the Ideologue of the “Post-Constitutional” Right
Russell Vought, one of the architects behind Project 2025, believes there is nothing left to conserve. He desires revolution – and to burn down the system.
Some thoughts from my new piece (link in bio):
🧵1/
I wrote about Russel Vought’s ideology of “radical constitutionalism” that captures the defining sensibility on the Trumpist Right: The Left has command of America, all that is noble has been destroyed, nothing short of a radical “counter-revolution” can now save the nation. 2/
Vought’s case is emblematic of the Right’s trajectory more broadly: From, at least rhetorically, claiming “small government” principles and “constitutional conservatism” to an ever more aggressive desire to mobilize the coercive powers of the state against the “enemy within.” 3/
Meet the Ideologue of the “Post-Constitutional” Right
Russell Vought, one of the architects behind Project 2025, believes there is nothing left to conserve. He desires revolution – and to burn down the system.
New piece (link in bio):
I wrote about Russel Vought’s ideology of “radical constitutionalism” that captures the defining sensibility on the Trumpist Right: The Left has command of America, all that is noble has been destroyed, nothing short of a radical “counter-revolution” can now save the nation.
Vought’s case is emblematic of the Right’s trajectory more broadly: From – at least rhetorically – claiming “small government” principles and “constitutional conservatism” to an ever more aggressive desire to mobilize the coercive powers of the state against the “enemy within.”
Why the Stakes in this Election Are So Enormously High
Democracy itself is on the ballot. If Trump wins, the extreme Right will be in a much better position than ever before to abolish it.
Some thoughts from my new piece - while we all nervously wait (link in bio):
🧵1/
Consider this my closing argument: As of right now, only one of the two major parties in the United States, the Democratic Party, for all its many flaws, is a (small-d) democratic party. The other one is firmly in the hands of a radicalizing ethno-nationalist movement. 2/
The fault lines in the struggle over whether or not the democratic experiment should be continued map exactly onto the fault lines of the struggle between the two parties. Democracy is now a partisan issue. Therefore, in every election, democracy itself is on the ballot. 3/
Combine the myth of American exceptionalism, (willful) historical ignorance, and a lack of political imagination and the result is a situation in which a lot of people refuse to take the Trumpist threat seriously.
There is a pervasive idea that in a country like the United States, with a supposedly centuries-long tradition of stable, consolidated democracy, authoritarianism simply has no realistic chance to succeed, that “We” have never experienced authoritarianism.
But the political system that was stable for most of U.S. history was a white man’s democracy, or racial caste democracy. There is absolutely nothing old or consolidated about *multiracial, pluralistic democracy* in America. It only started less than 60 years ago.
Many Americans struggle to accept that democracy is young, fragile, and could actually collapse – a lack of imagination that dangerously blunts the response to the Trumpist Right.
Some thoughts from my new piece (link in bio):
🧵1/
I wrote about the mix of a deep-seated mythology of American exceptionalism, progress gospel, lack of political understanding, and (willful) historical ignorance that has created a situation in which a lot of people simple refuse to take the Trumpist threat seriously. 2/
There is a lot of evidence that this election may be decided by a sizable group of people who strongly dislike Trump and his plans, but simply cannot imagine he would actually dare / manage to implement any of his promises and therefore aren’t mobilizing to vote. 3/