BREAKING: U.S. Supreme Court allows abortion providers to pursue challenge to Texas 6-week abortion ban
Supreme Court dismisses separate Biden administration case
In abortion providers case, court allows challenge to go ahead against state licensing officials but not anyone else
Court votes 8-1 on allowing state licensing officials to be sued, with only Clarence Thomas dissenting
Justice Sotomayor, dissenting in part, blasts colleagues for failing to "put an end to this madness" and says other states could still copy Texas b/c court isn't allowing AG or state court judges to be sued
Chief Justice Roberts and the three liberals all thought that other state officials could be sued and Roberts urges lower court judge to act "without delay"
Roberts: "The nature of the federal right infringed does not matter; it is the role of the Supreme Court in our constitutional system that is at stake."
Whole Woman's Health, the abortion provider that challenged the law, responds to the ruling:
U.S. Supreme Court leaves Texas abortion curbs intact but allows suit reuters.com/world/us/us-su…

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Lawrence Hurley

Lawrence Hurley Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @lawrencehurley

1 Dec
Today, the conservative-majority Supreme Court will consider gutting abortion rights:
reuters.com/world/us/us-su…
Here’s background on the case before the justices, on Mississippi’s 15-week abortion ban, which clearly falls foul of Roe v Wade’s core finding that women have a right to abortion before viability (generally starting around 24 weeks)
Read 14 tweets
30 Nov
49-year-old Amy Coney Barrett, the youngest member of the Supreme Court, was six days short of her first birthday when Roe v. Wade was decided on January 22, 1973
(and Barrett wasn't born when Roe was first argued in December 1971. The court then reargued the case in October 1972 before issuing the ruling)
Barrett in 2006 signed on to an advertisement in an Indiana newspaper calling for Roe v. Wade to be overturned
reuters.com/article/us-usa…
Read 4 tweets
29 Nov
Roe v Wade is on the line as the Supreme Court this week hears a huge abortion case from Mississippi.

At the state’s only abortion clinic, an apprehensive mood has descended, while anti-abortion activists are emboldened:

reuters.com/world/us/lone-…
“It makes me want to cry. It makes me feel defeated and horrified that people in this country hate women so much they don't want them to be able to access a full range of pregnancy care,” said a doctor who flies down from Massachusetts to work at the clinic
Outside the clinic, anti-abortion protester Beverly Anderson said she would "praise God" if the Supreme Court overturns Roe v Wade
Read 6 tweets
28 Nov
I’d be ok with the Editor’s Cut of anything directed by Peter Jackson
Ringo is so checked out
An hour of Beatles bickering in and there’s finally some nice footage of an early version of Get Back
Read 4 tweets
9 Nov
Today, Supreme Court weighs whether it's unlawful to exclude Puerto Rico from a benefits program that all Americans on the mainland are eligible for:
reuters.com/world/us/us-su…
This is a case that the Biden administration continued despite criticism while also asking Congress to extend the SSI benefit to Puerto Rico, which it might do if the Build Back Better plan ever passes
One question is whether any of the justices will delve into the toxic legacy of the so-called "Insular Cases" from over a century ago that helped establish second-class status for Puerto Ricans. More here:
Read 9 tweets
29 Oct
BREAKING: Supreme Court has agreed to consider whether to limit EPA's authority to regulate carbon emissions from power plants
In both these cases the Supreme Court is hearing cases involving federal regulations issued by the previous administration that were thrown out by lower courts and that the current administration has no intention of pursuing. The court in the past would generally avoid such cases
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(