1/6) Solana was DDoS attacked again yesterday

This attack exploited fundamental design flaws which are considered features by SOL

As it sacrifices decentralization & security for speed

While ignoring the consequences of that trade off

Specifically Proof of History & Turbine:
2/6) A consequence of PoH is deterministic block creation:

There is a good reason why public blockchains before SoL did not take this route

Non-deterministic block creation adds to security & censorship resistance as you cannot predict who will create the next block
3/6) Instead in SoL it is possible to predict & therefore attack the next block producers inline

For instance attacking the next 100 validators inline instead of attacking the entire network

This attack also works regardless of scale, thereby severely reducing SOL security
4/6) SOL security is not just reduced against DDoS attacks since this attack can also be combined with a 51% attack

Allowing an attacker to temporarily gain proportional staked control over the network by attacking other large stake holders

These are all consequences of PoH!
5/6) Combining Turbine with PoH leads to even more dire consequences:

Turbine divides the transaction memory pool into small groupings of validators

This means that with PoH you can censor transactions by just attacking the specific validators in that grouping next inline!
6/6) This is just one aspect of SOL's design that exposes the bad faith of its creation

Prioritizing attracting ignorant cryptocurrency investors over good sustainable blockchain design

There are many examples like this in terms of design as well as lies & fraud, buyer beware

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Justin Bons

Justin Bons Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Justin_Bons

28 Nov
1/22) Proof of Stake (PoS) is superior to Proof of Work (PoW) in every meaningful way.

Looking at these consensus algorithms objectively, from the standpoint of economics, security & decentralization.

The conclusion remains obvious that PoS has all of the advantages over PoW:
2/22) Economics:

Proof of Work carries with it a massive cost in arbitrary computation almost completely absent when compared to Proof of Stake.

This cost has to be reflected in either fees or inflation to pay for its long term security.
3/22) PoW externalizes the cost of validation by requiring a massive amount of hardware and electricity to secure the network.

All to solve arbitrary mathematical equations that do not directly benefit the network itself.
Read 23 tweets
5 Nov
1/6) In early April 2020 the Solana team stated that the total circulating supply was 8.2M.

When in reality the total circulating supply was above 20M!

Marking the start of a long series of lies, fraud & deception by SOL

The following story is all based on verifiable evidence:
2/6) As questions & critiques started to pile up over the following weeks,

The official moderators kept insisting that there was no extra circulating supply.

Certain people grew more suspicious especially as Solana failed to update their Binance info & Coinmarketcap profile.
3/6) By the end of the month a independent 3rd party managed to find a unlocked Solana wallet containing 13M tokens!

Once the Solana team was fully exposed they released a medium article admitting to the fraud,

Explaining that these 13M tokens where loaned to a “marker maker”.
Read 6 tweets
28 Jul 20
1/8) Zeus Capital is obviously attempting to profit from spreading FUD about LINK. Including using paid promotions over Twitter.

The report itself is full of inaccuracies & misinformation, even concluding with how to short LINK.

chainlink.docsend.com/view/nfrvnyuuz…

This needs debunking:
2/8)

1. Pump & dump groups are operating over all cryptocurrencies, unless it can be linked to the team this is not a valid criticism

2. The company does not act as a gatekeeper, only formal partnerships require permission, not all nodes

3. No evidence of "bogus" partnerships
3/8)

4. LINK does not run on ETH testnet, this claim is flat out false

5. High gas prices are the fault of ETH not LINK, this critique is moot

6. LINK has not exposed users to financial losses due to it running on ETH, this claim is false

7. There is no incentive conflict
Read 8 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(