Friday afternoon epiphany. Team LabLeak are not "like creationists." They ARE creationists: (1) They claim humans 'created' the coronavirus. (2) They ignore evidence & move goal posts. (3) They come up with stats-based arguments that evince a total misunderstanding of evolution.
Listen to Susan Weiss. It’d be incredibly, incredibly hard to engineer a virus that has a presymptomatic infectious stage like SARS2 does. We don’t know how to do that. COVID-19 isn’t a human creation.
The idea that inserting an FCS into a coronavirus Spike just magically starts a pandemic is a little like assuming that buying a young tall boy basketball shoes will get you a Kobe Bryant.
7 months later, still very relevant 👇

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jeremy Kamil

Jeremy Kamil Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @macroliter

7 Dec
1/ Did you know @Vir_Biotech's Sotrovimab antibody neutralizes OG 2003 SARS & SARS-CoV-2 variants -- even #Omicron? Since Sotrovimab was cloned from the memory B-cells of someone who recovered from COVID19, many recipients of current vaccines will develop similar antibodies...
2/ The @Vir_Biotech Humabs team found Sotrovimab by looking for antibodies that neutralized both 2003 SARS & SARS-CoV-2... nature.com/articles/s4158…
3/ But what if we could develop vaccines that trained our immune system to produce "broadly neutralizing antibodies" that can inactivate all SARS-like viruses? Not such a new idea.. Similar strategies have been proposed for influenza & even HIV! nature.com/articles/natur…
Read 10 tweets
4 Dec
1/ We in wealthy nations not only hoard vaccines 💉. We also hoard the genome sequencing 🧬 reagents needed for early detection of dangerous new variants like #Omicron which— coincidentally— emerge much more easily in poorly vaccinated regions …🧵 ft.com/content/4597ed…
2/ This problem stems from short-sighted scientific & political leadership in the West, exemplified by the attitude of @emblebi @embl co-Director Rolf Apfweiler in his May 2021 quote to @amymaxmen. THESE WORDS HAVE NOT AGED WELL IN WAKE OF #Omicron 🤦🏻‍♂️ nature.com/articles/d4158… Fears of exploitation haven...
3/ This quote from Peter Bogner of @GISAID juxtapose hauntingly against Apfweiler’s .. (but please read the whole @FT piece ft.com/content/4597ed…) Screenshot of excerpt from ...
Read 9 tweets
26 Nov
👋Hi Journalists! Are you interested in covering the new B.1.1.529 #B11529 variant🦠? Here's a link to a TABLE with the names & institutions of THE PEOPLE WHO DISCOVERED THIS VARIANT & SHARED THEIR DATA via the @GISAID community.
PLEASE REACH OUT! 🙏 dropbox.com/s/vb6k9l6ekl24…
In Botswana you have, for example the source of
@GISAID Accession ID: EPI_ISL_6752027, virus sample collected Nov 21, 2021, these authors from the Botswana @Harvard HIV reference laboratory...
Let me tell you their names, Sikhulile Moyo, Wonderful T. Choga, Dorcas Maruapula, Keoratile Ntshambiwa, Sefetogi Ramaologa, Thongbotho Mphoyakgosi, Boitumelo Zuze, Botshelo Radibe, Legodile Kooepile, Ontlametse T. Bareng, Pamela Smith-Lawrence, Kgomotso Moruisi, Roger Shapiro
Read 10 tweets
25 Nov
JOURNALISTS … please! Scientists in Africa absolutely did share these viral genome 🧬 data as part of the GISAID community. That’s how @PeacockFlu was able to see it. Their work is how these variants are known at all. These scientists have names, too. 😠 newsweek.com/b-1-1-529-new-…
FOR EXAMPLE… here’s a thread 🧵 from one of the scientists in Africa who has helped lead this very important work.
Read 8 tweets
23 Nov
Speaking out that “COVID is airborne” was helpful and important. But muckraking on COVID-19’s origins is a bit tawdry, TBH. 🧵
I abhor gatekeeping but there are actual experts and it’s worth listening to them.
Where did COVID-19 come from? If you look at the most careful analyses, the wet market is screaming hot & underscores a very high likelihood of natural emergence.
Read 5 tweets
14 Oct
Some very good "let's-not-make-a-scariant" coverage from @NOLAnews..it was a pleasure to talk to @emily_woodruff_ about the B.1.630 variant.. Also.. it's important to note that I'm speaking of "Collection Dates" NOT "Submission Dates". Backstory 🧵:
Why was this news? Our team recently sequenced some Aug 2021 samples from the Baton Rouge clinic & found 2 that were B.1.630. B.1.630 is a noteworthy variant 👀 with a freaky number of convergent Spike mutations shared by "Variants of Concern".. BUT... outbreak.info/situation-repo…
Even tho B.1.630 shares L452R with Delta, D950N with both Mu & Delta..and its T478K is almost like Delta's T478R, and it has H655Y like Gamma, & its E484Q is analogous to E484K found in many VOC/VOI, .......B.1.630 just can't complete with Delta.
Read 11 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(