I want to explain to you, @drlucymcbride, “what the heck happened”; the racist attacks & the Town Hall’s cancellation.
I want to explain in case you really don’t know.
I want to explain because we all fail.
I want to explain because the people you hurt deserve your apology. 🧵
I want to explain there is no “politely asking to join a panel” at the last minute; the event you intruded yourself on was months in the making and represented the work of many hands.
Do you see how affixing the word “politely” to “asking” doesn’t change that fact?
I want to explain that when a person like Dr. Salas-Ramirez is singled out for a “fight”, it’s not okay to respond as if you want to join that.
Do you see how your response helped draw battle lines?
I want to explain that it is not okay to point fingers publicly at the participants you think are responsible for keeping you out of an event you had no place in.
Do you see how that invited anger and left those participants open to attack?
I want to explain that those involved chose a topic & format. It's not okay for you to redefine the Town Hall as deficiently in want of your point of view.
Do you see how that invites people to believe they were unrepresented as opposed to just needing to wait their turn?
I want to explain that announcing on Twitter that “the other organizers said ‘no’” ….
…. is not “respectfully taking no for an answer”.
Do you see how it’s publicly announcing to your followers who you believe is at fault for leaving you out of something you had no place in?
I want to explain that if you take the time to read your replies, then by all means thank the people whose kindness you are grateful for.
But it is just as important to reply to those who may need you to calm their anxieties; after all, calm is what you say you provide.
Do you see how not calming the anxiety of someone who called a participant “the devil incarnate” seems like an endorsement?
I want to explain to you that the person who was called “the devil incarnate” without redress by you was one of the participants singled out for the most vicious attacks. Do you see your hand in creating that and can you see how your hand might have prevented that?
You say you don’t know "what the heck happened".
I wanted to tell you because you should know.
I want to believe you will do the right thing.
I want to believe you know what that is.
I want to believe that when it’s in your power to do so, you won’t let this happen again.
End
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
.@ShiraDoronMD et al argue against universal masking in healthcare based on 2 claims: 1) transmission risk from HCWs w/out symptoms is low 2) vaccination is sufficienly protective against hospital-acquired infection.
These claims are both knowably, provably wrong.
@AnnalsofIM
🧵
To establish their first claim, that the risk of transmission from HCWs without symptoms is low, the authors cite two sources: a) Killingley and b) Tayyar.
But a) Killingley does NOT show presymptomatic transmission risk is small. What Killingley actually shows is that, what the authors pass off as "minimal presymptomatic shedding," is consistent with **44% of transmission occuring presymptomatically**.
In honor of @TracyBethHoeg’s new anti-mask propaganda/preprint, I compiled her Tweets on mask studies into a textbook I’m calling, “Confounders: A Matter of Convenience.” It’s an expose of Hoeg’s bad faith hypocrisy. 🧵
Here’s the title page with a table of contents.
CHAPTER I:
HOW TO PROTEST PRO-MASK STUDIES
It's easy! Just complain the conclusion doesn’t hold because the data is confounded! 1. Eg. The Boston Mask Study
The moral panic over school closures has left us with problems more intractable than they were pre-pandemic because now, to solve those problems, we first have to dispel lies. That school is a preventative to suicide is a reprehensible distortion, but it is not the only one. 🧵
There is the hysteria over how closures hurt minorities the most which obscures that, for minorities, school is the source of a problem: the school-to-prison pipeline. nytimes.com/2020/10/28/opi…
There is the hysteria that closures are causing obesity which obscures the problem of fatty, nutritionally bankrupt cafeteria food. nypost.com/2019/11/16/the…
Following a lead in @mehdirhasan's receipt-riddled expose, I looked into FL's deadly summers but in terms of excess deaths (Hasan uses C0VID deaths) in the 10 US states with the highest percentage of seniors. Tl;dr: DeSantis won't be using these stats on the campaign trail. 🧵
The long list of concerns downplayers coopted for the sake of opening schools and then quickly abandoned: learning loss that didn't carry over to C0VID related cognitive declines, newsinfo.inquirer.net/1639956/omicro…
Shenoy et al urge abandoning universal masking on the grounds masks have little benefit & some harm. Yesterday I showed they're wrong about benefits. Today I show they're wrong about harms. Their strongest evidence favors masks. The rest has little relation to their ambitions. 🧵
In making the case that masks harm, the authors use three sources.
In Cormier et al patients & providers rate their masked & unmasked encounters in terms of communication difficulties. Using scales from 1-5 (patients) or from 1-6 (providers) participants are asked about eg. listening effort, ability to connect, understand & recall.