Zero HP Lovecraft 🦅🐍 Profile picture
Dec 11, 2021 30 tweets 8 min read Read on X
We are living in a scientific theocracy that has rejected both God and science.

This is possible because ideas are alive and they reproduce by influencing humans to spread them, and there's a sense in which ideas are bigger organisms than people, higher up the food chain
An older version of this thought: the idée fixe—an idea becomes an object of fixation, and completely overtakes the person, til his mind is nothing but the idea. This is part of the theory of the idea as force: "people don't have ideas, ideas have people"
But the understanding of "idea as force" is incomplete without an account of the Darwinian struggle between ideas. It's not only a metaphor, to say ideas have their own life, because although they exist in our minds, they exist independently from any individual
That said, we should not abandon the notion of personal agency, but we must contextualize it. There are things which are made purely of ideas, things that move among us, that also move us. Some people call this an "egregore" but lately I have taken to "metahuman"
A great man, who commands the multitudes and shapes the world to his will, becomes metahuman, and his command becomes an identity, an epistemic grounding, a verbal uniform—in short, an ideology
Ideologies—metahumans—are much more immanent because of the internet. They move, spread, and evolve faster. Their food is attention, their ecosystem is our minds, and some are parasitic, some are symbiotic, and some are predatory
Not that "scenes" or subcultures never existed before; we can think of various metahumans from history such as religions and nations, especially. You might expect the internet to create a Cambrian explosion of ideologies, but I think the opposite is true
There are 3 avenues of transmission for a living cluster of ideas: vertically, from parent to child; horizontally, from peer to peer; and institutionally, from school to student. The internet disempowers institutional transmission the same way institutional disempowers vertical
The increase in speed and spread of these "metahumans" allows them to evolve faster and to maintain tighter coherence within themselves. When it takes days or weeks to send a letter, ideas drift and diverge within their carriers. When it takes seconds, they stay in sync
And when things spread via network effects, winners win yugely. For the same reason BTC has an order of magnitude greater market cap than ETH, the biggest thoughtforms in the game dominate the smaller ones, and "woke" is the biggest game in town
You could pick up a lot of this from reading about memetics, the now pretty much dead branch of thought that sprung off of dawkins and blackmore and a few others, though that thoughtline was deficient in the ways Moldbug outlined unqualified-reservations.org/2007/09/how-da…
The problem with treating these metahuman entities as hostile invaders is roughly the same as treating your gut bacteria as hostile invaders. You have a gut biome for digesting food and a mind biome for digesting perceptions
Like any metaphor, this one is limited, because gut biomes don't spread virally, but mind biomes can and do. And the truth is, when we hear the call of an idea that feels clear and beautiful, authentic and true, we have very little power to resist it
Early in its lifecycle, the loss of a key man can wipe out a thoughtform, but as it spreads, it takes on a life of its own. People who are successful at spreading ideas are rewarded by those ideas for doing so, in the form of prestige
This is, again, not to discount individual agency regarding the ideas we ingest, but it's likewise a mistake to pretend we have no reliance on them. The collectivist vs. individualist debate is idiotic, but it's also a durable self-replicator
From this you can see how truth is not essential to the fitness of a self-replicating idea cluster, and it may be even be a hindrance. Lies, simplifications and contradictions all have their uses to the organism, and every ideology has them
There are shapes ideas must take to stick in our minds, and there are doctrines that arise in different places and times in almost the same shape. This could be evidence of either perennialism or convergent evolution
Example of convergent evolution: Pure Land Buddhism mirrors the Lutheran idea of Sola Fide, salvation through faith alone. Pure Land Buddhists believe enlightenment (salvation) is unattainable in a fallen world, and comes instead from faith in Amitābha
An idea hits the Darwinian jackpot when it manages to colonize an influential school or a government department of education. A scientific paradigm is one type of idea that can do this, and it obeys all the same rules as any other kind of idea
Besides predictive power, a scientific paradigm might have properties which allow it to thrive and multiply in a govt dept of science. Eg. a hypothesis might engender a state of crisis that necessitates new departments, jobs, laws, consultants, lobbyists, and so on
Government money-receivers want to keep existing, so both institutionally and personally, participants in them aren't capable of apprehending the counterfactual to the hypothesis that justifies them. Anyone who can is filtered and selected out as part of the evolutionary process
This is an inextricable feature of the Vannevar Bush system: once it's captured by a dogma, it has no recovery mechanism. A scientific finding which expands bureaucratic power causes the system to replicate it, regardless of replicability
Every scientist in the regime must also be a bureaucrat; he must know the prejudices of grant-writers and appeal to them. Those prejudices are determined by scientific consensus, which is determined by those same prejudices
Real scientists are interested in falsifiability, but scientific theocrats are interested only in dogma. They advertise their lies as "settled science" and "consensus among scientists" but they don't even see the narrow chokepoint of govt funding through which consensus must pass
Slowly at first, then all at once, Science that depends on state power becomes a factory that manufactures state power. Simultaneously the state evolves to launder power through Science. We can think of many examples
No moderate or centrist view is possible once a hypothesis is entrenched in scientific institutions. No study that seeks to negate it will be funded. 97% of scientists will agree, almost as if the negation of certain positions instantly ends your career
We see this dynamic play out with climate change, covid, with questions of race, and most strangely, with the LGBT movement. Science should not make any moral claims, should not cross the is/ought barrier, yet it now informs me that transgenders are heckin' cute and valid
Science (big-S) now attempts to ground prescriptive claims such as "you should castrate your 13 year old son" with descriptive claims such as "clownfishes exhibit sequential hermaphroditism." Scientists refer to this as the Novum Organum zerohplovecraft.wordpress.com/2021/09/27/the…
That the regime has lost the ability to do science is a source of untapped strength for us. Dissident anons can out-predict the regime because we hew closer to reality. So we must not abandon science (small s) out of disdain for Science (big S)
Having abandoned faith and eschatology, Science has become faith, become eschatology. In these online spaces where new rival thoughtforms ferment and foment, we need to recover the sense of religious fear, so it may be overcome by religious hope

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zero HP Lovecraft 🦅🐍

Zero HP Lovecraft 🦅🐍 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @0x49fa98

Jan 13
A common refrain these days — actually we’ve been hearing it for years — is that whites are under attack, and that we need to start practicing identity politics, white identity politics. Supposedly, this is the only thing that can save us from extinction.
It sounds superficially plausible; we are being overrun by the brown hordes. What do they have that we lack? What strategy or quality must we adopt to compete?

They tell me that “individualism” is bad, that it makes you “rootless”—
—instead we are supposed to favor "collectivism," in which the individual is subsumed into the group.

I used to argue in favor of white identity politics, but I’ve seen first-hand how rapidly it degrades into gynolatry, communism, and victim-worship
Read 28 tweets
Sep 17, 2023
Imagine believing that you could enjoy your “career” or your job. The biggest psyop (hate that word) ever perpetrated against women is telling them that men find a sense of purpose in their job

We work because we want the byproducts of work, not because we like toil
To live in corporate life you are forced to constantly affirm this lie. “Oh I want a fulfilling job” “I want to do good in the world” “I love working with all these awesome people” — no, I want a paycheck; I barely tolerate all of this bullshit as my soul is screaming silently
Work is a prison and it doesn’t matter if it’s blue or white collar work, and it doesn’t matter if you’re a CEO or cashier. None of this is fulfilling. Being an adult means enduring a lifetime of prison conditions because everything of value is built in hell
Read 8 tweets
Jun 21, 2023
TikTok is as pornographic than onlyfans

OF sells short fantasies about bodies and bits

TikTok sells short fantasies about lifestyles and love

A woman carefully staging a video about how she cooks for her family (notice no husband is shown) is performing a sexual fantasy
but the fantasy has just a tiny veneer of plausible deniability, it lets men pretend that that's not what they're doing

Remember, incels don't want sex (sex is cheap) or else they would just buy it. They want all the other second-order things around sex that you can't buy
any time a woman posts herself online, whether she's doing an explicitly sexual thing or not, she is still presenting herself *as an object of desire*

The layer of separation makes her an unattainable object, though she may resemble an attainable object
Read 5 tweets
Jun 10, 2023
The problem here is that this is a woman, deep down inside, mentally, she will always be a woman

Men have an inherent essence which makes us resilient against the coldness of the universe. It's not just that she lacks the reproductive hardware, she also lacks the mental hardware
Basically she's crying because people are now treating her like a man, something she thought she wanted, but she actually had no idea what it's like to be a man, and still doesn't — because there is something essential to it which goes far beyond exo-testosterone and a beard
most women are so solipsistic that when they encounter unfiltered male consciousness, they can only react by assuming we are defective women, when there is actually an entire, invisible aspect of "maleness" that they can't even perceive
Read 5 tweets
May 19, 2023
This part of heartiste is actually “the problem” imo. Most men don’t want the truth and react badly to learning it. People react badly to these things now because once you understand how women work, you either turn into medgold or rollo. Most people find both repellant
Roosh had a medgold arc but eventually the psychic externalities were too much for him, so he retreated into religion. This was in every way a retreat. Normie conservatives and leftoids alike insist on idealizing women and pretending they have a purer or higher nature than men
Roosh’s religious conversation was an attempt to recapture that innocence, probably not very successful

Men are the real romantics, women are the real cold, calculating pragmatists. Majority of men don’t want women as they are in reality, they want a romanticized ideal of women
Read 5 tweets
Apr 26, 2023
Christians would like this project to disarm Nietzsche for them, Nietzscheans would like it to materialize Christ. Neither will get their wish. I have worked on this for four months now, and it is imperfect, like me, but I am honored to share it with you

zerohplovecraft.substack.com/p/marooned-in-… Image
Yes, it is three and a half hours long. If I had more time, it might be shorter. But I have other projects to work on and I have hit a point of diminishing returns.
I don’t want to give it all away, I want you to read it, but I also want people to find it, so I have to write a thread about it. There is something in here to offend absolutely everyone, whether racially, sexually, or most of all, religiously. No one escapes
Read 29 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(