A smart post (as always!) by @RameshPonnuru. Ramesh is right to point out that a glass that is 70 percent empty is still 30 percent full. Abortion politics are matters of both position (what should the law be?) and priority (how much should I care?), and /1
White Evangelicals might be more pro-life than other demographics and rank the issue higher, but most still don't rank it as highest priority and rank other things (immigration, deficits(?), health care costs, etc.) higher. See, for example: /2
And see, for example: /4 religioninpublic.blog/2020/08/27/for…
But 30 percent is still 30 percent, and that can and does make a real difference, especially when there's also evidence that the minority of Republicans (including Evangelicals) who prioritize life is larger than the minority of Democrats who prioritize abortion rights. /5
See, for example, the recent VA governor's race. In a 27 percent white Evangelical electorate, only 8 percent of *all* voters prioritized abortion rights. But 58 percent of that 8 percent were pro-life. /6
The bottom line is most white Evangelicals don't prioritize abortion in voting, most don't seek to ban abortion, and most prioritize other issues (including immigration), but the minority who do prioritize life are critically important to the cause. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with David French

David French Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DavidAFrench

2 Dec
Defamation law (properly applied) is vital to ordered liberty. I'm going to be watching this lawsuit, filed today against Gateway Pundit, with great interest. The allegations are incredibly damning. It chronicles one piece of fake news after another /1: protectdemocracy.org/update/defamed…
And the tsunami of falsehood has real consequences for real people /2.
And if you think, "Who cares about Gateway Pundit? It's fringe, troll right," remember that it's one of the top websites in right-wing media. /3
Read 4 tweets
14 Oct
In which I weigh in on the third party debate. Yes, @JonahDispatch is right. If you believe conservative policies and principles provide the best opportunities for our nation and its people to flourish, it's time to think beyond the binary choice: /1 frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/jonah-is-rig…
It's just wrong to think that conservative critics merely have a problem with Trump, and when he's gone then we can all hold hands. The GOP is in a moral free-fall. It's ideologically incoherent and increasingly authoritarian. How do I distrust the GOP? Let's count it up: /2
I don’t trust the GOP on election integrity. I believe that it is infected almost top to bottom by a combination of conspiracists and cowards who would, in fact, try to steal an American election (again). /3
Read 9 tweets
6 Oct
Quick thread. Cut through all Dinesh's mockery (which is not an argument), and he makes my point for me. He exaggerates the national divide and ignores the empirical, well-documented evidence that Americans do have deeply mistaken beliefs about each other. /1
He also doubles down on his Tiananmen Square/January 6th analogy (though conceding that not as many people died on 1/6) and decries a government crackdown and "mass censorship," even as he tweets, unironically, to almost two million followers. /2
My core point in my piece was that people like Dinesh use hyperbole to exaggerate divisions, which increases American anxiety and anger. He in fact does precisely that in this clip. But my point that Americans hold mistaken beliefs about each other is documented and true. /3
Read 6 tweets
10 Sep
I'm not seeing a lot of threads diving into the constitutionality of the proposed Biden OSHA vaccine mandate. So here's a general overview (it's Twitter, so it will be basic-more details upcoming in podcasts and in print). /1
Vaccine mandates are both common and constitutional, when implemented by proper authorities. There is SCOTUS authority on this dating back more than 100 years, and that same authority has been cited to support COVID restrictions during this pandemic. /2
However, the authority issue is key. As we've seen from the start of the pandemic, governors/state legislatures possess far more power to order lockdowns/masking/vaccines than the federal government. I explained why all the way back in March 2020 /3 thedispatch.com/p/the-police-p…
Read 11 tweets
9 Jul
You want more discussion of CRT laws? Well, you'll get more discussion of CRT laws. My oped Sunday with @kmele, @thomaschattwill, and @jasonintrator generated a lot of critique, but then I noticed something. See if you notice it also /1 frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/even-the-def…
In his thoughtful critique of the oped, Stanley Kurtz says this about the TX law: "This phrasing could potentially prevent even discussion of the various concepts, which would indeed run afoul of our culture of free expression, despite being legally permissible." /2
In his critique, my friend Rich Lowry also says the same Texas law is allegedly “going to get a scrub in the Texas special session” and says “it’s totally legitimate to worry about the wording of the laws." /3
Read 11 tweets
13 Jun
It’s wrong to frame the Baptist battle as a fight between “true conservatives” versus the “woke.” The battle isn’t left versus right. Instead, it’s over much more elemental concerns, including truth, transparency, corruption, and—ultimately—character.  frenchpress.thedispatch.com/p/character-is…
For example, there are good-faith arguments to be had about the best institutional methods of dealing with sex abuse. Calling victims “whores” or “crazy” is not among those methods. Nor is describing victim advocates as instruments of a “Satanic scheme.”
When leaders lament, however, that the wrong side won the Civil War or claim that only armed citizens will save cities from “black people,” they do not assure America that the nation’s largest, most powerful denomination has decisively rejected a shameful past.
Read 4 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(