BTW, I hate the press when they say it's "false". Well, no, we can't prove a negative. We can't say mass voter fraud is "false".
All we can say is that it's so far "unsubstantiated".
All we can say is that it's so far "unsubstantiated".
https://twitter.com/ErrataRob/status/1470465771407134722
Our voting systems are fragile and we should always be vigilant for problems. To say it's "false" then creates a political barrier if somebody finds something that's true. Election fraud is certainly true in other countries (e.g. Belarus, recently).
But we should expect an easy bar to cross: first a coherent explanation of what happened, and secondly evidence that substantiates that explanation.
Oltman and Doug Frank both claim they can show statistical anomalies, but neither have done so in a coherent way that I can replicate and either confirm or refute. If they are right, then they do a disservice to the cause by not being coherent/replicatable.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
