The entire U. of Washington men's basketball team is vaccinated, but apparently still pose enough of a threat that they must quarantine and cancel games. Why then are non-vaccinated state employees in Washington being fired, based on the unique threat *they* allegedly pose? 
Was just on Seattle radio where the host told me about this. If vaccine does not prevent transmission, it makes no sense to punish "the un-vaccinated" on the ground that they allegedly pose some unique threat. This becomes apparent if you stop to think about it for two seconds
The whole premise behind why there was an ethical duty to get vaccinated was because you were "protecting others." If vaccine does not enable you to "protect others," the ethical duty argument is negated. Otherwise it's only about individual health, which was never the argument
Here's the show I was on if you're curious omny.fm/shows/live-fro…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
