The ten point plan of the Marxists. If you are inclined to see this as anything other than a blueprint for tyranny (justified by the proclamation of care for the oppressed) you are at best a useful idiot. At worst? Worst is very bad. Maybe that's you too:
12 people complained about me over the years to you but 2400 have indicated their support in the last 3 hours alone (see comments accompanying the attached video).
Why doesn't the fact of such widespread public support matter to you? Could it be that you have an agenda, such it doesn't matter if the ratio of people who support me to oppose me is 1000:1 or higher?
I asked you this question formally, and many others, but you refused to answer, like the arrogant and self-righteous cowards you are.
What gives, you silent hypocrites, you power-hungry second-raters, you bureaucratic tyrant wannabes?
Where do you think this is going? Because it's nowhere good.
And I'm asking you directly, Dr Tony Debono, new College Registrar, who at one point tentatively agreed to talk to me, but then didn't:
is this the direction you envisioned for your professional life?
If you and your minions think you will be able to wrap yourself in a shroud of bureaucratic secrecy and protect yourself while all this unfolds you should think again.
Before it goes too far.
As I indicated when I reached out to you previously to talk.
I want the entire current crop of minions at the College of Psychologists to publicly apologize and then resign--en masse: @CPOntario
They want me to undergo re-education, which they know will take up my time and fail in any case, so they can undermine my reputation and take my licence away anyway.
Lay down your bets!
A higher court in Canada has ruled that the Ontario College of Psychologists indeed has the right to sentence me to re-education camp. There are no other legal avenues open to me now.
It's capitulate to the petty bureaucrats and the addle-pated woke mob or lose my professional licence.
Congratulations,
@CPOntario
!
You won this round.
Mark my words, however: the war has barely started. There is nothing you can take from me that I'm unwilling to lose.
I asked Grok: Expand a bit more on how de Sade's philosophy is rooted in the French enlightenment. Please provide references for your arguments, APA formatted, if possible.
The Marquis de Sade's philosophy is deeply rooted in the French Enlightenment, a period of intellectual and philosophical growth in 18th-century Europe. The French Enlightenment emphasized reason, individualism, and skepticism, promoting the idea that human beings could use their intellect to improve society and achieve progress. Key figures of the French Enlightenment included Voltaire, Rousseau, and Diderot.
De Sade's philosophy challenges traditional morality and societal norms, much like other Enlightenment thinkers who questioned the established order. He believed in the pursuit of personal pleasure, even at the expense of others, and rejected the notion of divine authority or moral codes. This emphasis on individualism and personal freedom is a key aspect of the Enlightenment.
De Sade's works often explored themes of violence, sexuality, and individualism. He believed that exceptional individuals were not bound by the same moral codes as the rest of society, a concept that can be seen as an extension of the Enlightenment's focus on reason and individualism.
In conclusion, the Marquis de Sade's philosophy is rooted in the French Enlightenment, as it emphasizes individualism, challenges traditional morality, and explores the potential of human reason.
References:
Feay, S. (2015). Who Was the Marquis De Sade? The Telegraph. Retrieved from
Gonzalez-Crussi, F. (1988). The Dangerous Marquis de Sade. The New York Times. Retrieved from
Lichfield, J. (2014). Marquis De Sade: Rebel, Pervert, Rapist...Hero? The Independent. Retrieved from
Perrottet, T. (2015). Who Was the Marquis De Sade? Smithsonian Magazine. Retrieved from
Sade, D. (1795). Philosophy in the Bedroom (L. Lang, Trans.). Paris: L'Enfer Press.
A follow up query: Compare and contrast the philosophy of Raskolnikov with that of the Marquis de Sade and draw out the associations with the thought of the French Enlightenment.
My discussion with Helen Joyce has been banned by @YouTube all friendly-like on the grounds of hate speech and incitement to violence. Experience the evil for yourself here: twitter.com/i/broadcasts/1…