Has any political party in the world attacked its own country with the stamina and intensity of the Democrat Party after 2000? From unleashing crime on the streets and weaponizing the federal bureaucracy, to Joe Biden's all-out War on the Middle Class, they've been relentless.
Looking back, 2000 seems like a real turning point for Democrats. They had all kinds of bad ideas before that, and some of those ideas did a LOT of damage, but after 2000 the party grew increasingly and openly obsessed with punitive policies, destroying and rebuilding America.
Maybe it was the 2000 election itself and the bitter partisan hangover. Maybe it was cultural and political turmoil on the Left after 9/11, the ugly dawn of the "Why do they hate us so much?" chickens-coming-home-to-roost response to terrorism.
Maybe it was the hard Left completing its long march to power and shouldering Bill Clinton's "Third Way" types aside, or the Left's savage hatred for George W. Bush, and the story Dems told themselves about dirty tricks from deplorable Swift Boaters stealing 2004 from Kerry.
Maybe it was campus culture spreading out to infect American society and politics at large. That definitely played a role in the dawn of cancel culture - an even more virulent form of political correctness, unleashed *after* P.C. had become a punchline.
Say what you will about Bill Clinton's many sins, but he didn't give off that modern Democrat vibe of loathing most of the country and lusting to dynamite vast swaths of America so it could be rebuilt according to lefty utopian visions. That garbage didn't blossom until Obama.
Maybe it was pure selfish political calculation on Bill Clinton's part, maybe he was just feeding his ego, but he loved taking credit for prosperity. He made ugly cash grabs with his "Invest in America," "Pay Your Fair Share" rhetoric, but he didn't want to kill the golden goose.
But now the Democrats are wholly obsessed with targeting and punishing huge chunks of American society and industry, slamming us with destructive policies in a snarling hunt for various forms of "justice" that permits no trial for the accused, no possibility of parole.
Everything the post-Clinton Democrats say is a declaration of war against some part of America, a vow to use the power of the State to crush somebody, a list of punishments they can't wait to inflict. They couldn't even champion America at Biden's dumb "democracy summit."
Modern Democrats think "championing America" means joining authoritarians in rattling off a list of America's grievous sins, agreeing with our enemies that we barely have a right to exist at all, but then expressing hope for a better future under one-party Democrat rule.
And it's not just rhetoric - the Democrats *act* on this stuff. The pandemic really unleashed their burning desire to dynamite the hideous old deplorable America into rubble and rebuild it according to Party ideology. Twenty years of mounting arrogance and rage has detonated.
America's adversaries are avidly exploiting this trend in Democrat ideology. How does the reign of a superpower end? When its own ruling Party agrees with its enemies that it shouldn't be a superpower anymore, and never really had a moral right to claim that title. /end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with John Hayward

John Hayward Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @Doc_0

15 Dec
Of all the systems mankind has devised to allocate scarce resources, capitalism is - by far - the best at increasing supply in response to demand.

The enforcers of every other ideology invest a great deal of effort into making people forget that simple, powerful truth.
Politics, ideology, economics - in the end, it boils down to figuring out who gets how much, because there will never be enough for everyone to have everything. Even if we had some magical technology that produced goods from thin air, our time would still be limited and valuable.
The cold, hard truth is that capitalism - private citizens owning capital and freely investing it to create profit - is the system most likely to increase the supply of scarce resources to meet demand. We have seen this demonstrated time and again since the Industrial Revolution.
Read 14 tweets
2 Dec
Few cheap political hacks deserve to be hoist on the petard of their own rhetoric more than Joe Biden, so it's fun to see him called a racist for imposing "travel apartheid" on Africa, as the U.N. Secretary-General put it - but why should we treat travel bans as illogical?
We're told travel restrictions are nonsensical because "Omicron is already here" - but why is it unreasonable to restrict travel from places suffering major outbreaks, reducing the number of additional infections entering the country? What happened to "flattening the curve?"
What happened to "If it saves just one life?" Every case of this ostensibly super-dangerous variant prevented from infecting Americans is potentially saving lives. Total case numbers are constantly invoked as a crisis metric, so why not reduce cases with travel restrictions?
Read 10 tweets
1 Dec
Roe v. Wade was wrong and everyone knows it, including ferocious defenders of abortion. They excuse its legal and ethical deficiencies because they agree with the outcome - and thus were generations of "ends justify the means" political corruption unleashed.
You can't say you love democracy if you also think democracy should be jettisoned like rubbish every time there's a crisis, every time the ruling elite need to impose a "correct" decision on the entire country through fiat. Roe helped launch our drift toward authoritarianism.
Sure, you can talk about "freedom" and cast your silly little votes - but the really important decisions will be made on high by the Anointed Ones and imposed from coast to coast through inescapable decrees. You are not allowed to vote on a growing list of "settled" issues.
Read 9 tweets
30 Nov
One of the most consequential turns in modern politics was the post-Reagan Left bullying Republicans, and many conservative pundits, away from discussing morality or using moral arguments to drive their agenda. It was an incredible coup. We're really just starting to push back.
Maybe the Left was able to pull it off because Bush I and Quayle were so awkward about discussing moral issues, even when they had the better arguments, as demonstrated by those "Dan Quayle Was Right" op-eds many years later. They *sounded* wrong even when they were right.
We ended up with the libertarian-sounding formulation of "fiscally conservative, but socially liberal" and the retreat bugle toot of "you can't legislate morality!" Meanwhile, the Left plunged full speed ahead as fiscal and social liberals who gleefully imposed their morality.
Read 12 tweets
29 Nov
ALL government spending is a tax increase, the taxes always hit the middle class hardest. The only question is when and how the new taxes will be extracted from your wallet. Right now, you're paying through inflation, and you ain't seen nothing yet.
It's remarkably easy to trick people into forgetting that nothing is "free." It's a lesson we all learn as children, but politicians manipulate adults into forgetting it. Intelligent people become gullible fools when the offer of Free Stuff comes from political hucksters.
The big swindle of the past few decades was tricking people into thinking Big Gov could provide oceans of Free Stuff forever by simply racking up the national debt. Nothing has to be "paid for!" We'll just print more money, maybe punch out some trillion-dollar platinum coins.
Read 14 tweets
23 Nov
Lefties assume everything is static, which is not surprising for an ideology that prizes obedience as the most valuable resource. They are confounded by dynamic responses and unpredictability. They really think $1 in tax hikes should produce $1 in government revenue.
This is why socialists think the trappings of middle-class life can be distributed as government welfare benefits to create an acceptable facsimile of prosperity. What's the difference between buying food and using food stamps? Between earning income and receiving benefits?
But economics is all about both the journey AND the destination. Assets have little true value when they're at rest. Their value comes from what we do with them, and how those decisions are made. Every economic action creates energy, including the negative energy of cost.
Read 9 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(