TOP LINE:
Full lockdown phase: significant decrease (-15%)
SECOND HEADLINE:
Up but within expected for the remainder.
THIRD HEADLINE:
No change if the year taken in total.
/2 Note: GETH plot (my creation!). The previous months are actually TWO FULL pre-pandemic years (Mar-Feb 18-20), and all rates are standardized for population. Error bars are 95% CI for Proportions. All charts read MAR-FEB to capture a "full pandemic year."
/3 Can we break it down by sex? Sure can!
Boys: same pattern, suicides decreased significantly (-18%!) during the strictest school measures, and increased (nonsignificantly, 13%) during the second school year of the pandemic.
Take note of the FLAT March-July (more later)
/4 Girls: The decrease (8%) March-June and the increase (9%) Sept-Feb are well within normal historical changes year to year.
/5 What about the elementary school kids? No significant changes. Due to low #'s dying of suicide, the error bars are. Not even summing months creates significance.
Do you hear that, oh ye misinformation spreaders? YOUNG KIDS DID NOT DIE OF SUICIDE MORE DURING THE PANDEMIC.
/6 Now let's look at high-schoolers (13-17)
A huge difference based on phase of pandemic.
End of School year 2020: -16% and way lower than expected.
Next school year, within expected, slightly higher.
/7 The first school year of the pandemic (with full lockdowns) also represents the FIRST TIME IN 21 YEARS that March-June (school months) had the same low suicide rate as July (non school month). Typically, school months associated with 36-55% increase in HS kids.
/8 Yes, I will repeat that again.
EVERY SINGLE YEAR from 1999-2019, High School kids in the US died of suicide about 40% more frequently on March-Jun vs July. In 2020, when:
* all schools were shutdown
* during a new pandemic
the Mar-Jun rate equaled the lowest rate (July)!!
/9 We can also break it down by CDC Race (please note, CDC Race is clunky and I cannot do anything about that)
White kids in the US had a significant decrease (-18%) in suicide rates in the inital phase, and no significant change in the subsequent year.
/10 Hispanic kids, and non-white kids in the US showed similar patterns. I personally feel its simply underpowered to detect it, but I think white kids did better. There is no statistically significant difference racially for RATE changes, but do keep note of the overall rates.
/11 Especially as it pertains to Indigenous children in the US. While, fortunately, there was no pandemic effect, it's very important to note how ridiculously high the rate of suicide is amongst Indigenous Youth (close to the adult white rate).
/12 I have all the data 8-24 for every group, so I'm happy to answer any questions people may have for this, the best I can. I do have provisional data heading into the 2nd pandemic year (mar-may) at high reliability and the general message is "it settled down"
/13 This puts a final pin in the notion that kids were overall "more likely to die of suicide" during the pandemic. The net effect on suicides of kids in the first year of the pandemic was COMPLETELY FLAT:
/14 The data is also entirely consistent with a very data-backed position I have been stating for quite some time: when lockdowns were strongest (least amount of school), suicide rates amongst kids were lowest. School is a well established risk-factor for suicide.
/15 For a preview into what we're seeing so far in 2021, I can say from preliminary CDC and embargoed data that I have access to that after around April-ish, things settled back into expected #'s for the remainder of the year.
/16 As always, if you follow me you will find data-driven answers, not speculation. Only a few suicidologists chose the correct path of NOT PREDICTING an increase in suicides in young people. Media, take note. It is always foolish to PREDICT suicide rates, we ain't that good yet.
/17 Data is from CDC:
Provisional Multiple Cause of Death on CDC WONDER Online Database, released 2021. Accessed at wonder.cdc.gov/mcd-icd10-prov… on Dec 14, 2021
/18 Media: please contact me via DM if you would like to discuss, interview, or get more information. Please help me correct the wrong narrative that DOMINATED the pandemic.
All visualizations are mine; media have full permission to use, if using please credit me.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Battling Election Misinformation
Part 2: "The Mandate"
Contrary to media/republican pronouncements, the election of Donald Trump was one of the narrowest (by popular vote, +1.73%) in history, with only 7 elections since 1800 being narrower.
/1
In fact, if we look at the margin of victory when we include all eligible voters, Trump wins with 31.3% of the voting population, compared to Harris' 30.2% and 1% going to other candidates. 37.4% did not vote.
If we only include voters, Trump wins 50.03% to 49.97%
/2
When we look at the electoral college results, Trump won 58% of available electoral college votes. This would rank his election 41st out of 57 elections since 1800.
"[AIDS] is not being caused by a virus. It's not a virus... These people are dying because of 'poppers'... they were people who were part of a gay lifestyle... "
"This is not a viral disease, but it's a disease that is environmental."
- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr
/1
Chemicals in water are causing trans kids: "A lot of the problems we see in kids... are coming from chemical exposures, including a lot of the sexual dysphoria that we’re seeing."
- HHS Secretary Nominee RFK Jr
/2
Wifi radiation causes autism, allergies, asthma, eczema: “I think it degrades your mitochondria and it opens your blood-brain barrier,”
🧵Battling Antivax Disinfo🧵
Vaccination did NOT increase cancer deaths.
Here I took the 6 deadliest cancers (all 5 survival rates under 50%) in a highly vaccinated population (25-54), and we can see ZERO evidence of vaccine-related cancer deaths, all the way to May 2024.
/1
If i move ages to 55+, we see the same thing, and we are now looking at a lot of deaths from these extremely aggressive cancers, so this isn't some underpowered stuff here. There is NO evidence that deadly cancers have increased due to vaccination.
None.
/2
If we take all ages 5+ and look for until May 2024, we see no increase in these highly aggressive cancer deaths, or any cancer deaths.
The Presidential Election
Data Geekery with my interpretations
1) The Country Shifted, but More Didn't.
The final share will be ~ +1.3 to +1.5% for Trump, which is a shift of ~+5.8%.
If America was a room with 65 people in it, only 2 out of the 65 people switched shirts.
/1
Note: this math might seem like it doesn't work, but we have to remember to include those that voted 3rd party (1.5%ish) and those that didn't vote (about 35%).
Excluding non-voters who were eligible,
2020: 22/43 D & 20/43 R
2024: 20/42 D & 21/42 R
/2
In other words, the great majority of the country didn't switch, but we know there was definitely a nudge towards republican vote.
What does this mean?
The narratives about "America changing" should be very cautious, as 93% of America did not change.
/3
🚨COVID-19 Vaccination saves lives and improves outcomes 🚨
In this UK study of >3 MILLION PEOPLE who vaccinated, the incidence of mental health problems was significantly reduced when a subsequent COVID-19 infection occurred.
/1
Looking at the totals who were infected with COVID-19, it is clear that COVID-19 diagnosis was associated with a ROBUST increase in mental health problems after the diagnosis.
/2
This adds to the massive and still growing body of evidence that Covid 19 Vaccination was safe, effective, and extremely important especially considering that after this study, virtually everyone was infetcted with COVID-19.
/3
Yet another study finding differential impacts (mostly with decrease of symptoms) on the mental health of youth comparing prepandemic to pandemic times.
The media far far far less likely to report on these now common findings.
/1
My colleagues and I talked about this at length, that there were many reasons to be cautious about the early "expert predictions" and in fact when good evidence was considered, many so-called evidence based scientists were wrong: dire outcomes on mental health harder to find.
/2
Our '23 peer-reviewed commentary here, g despite many professionals who attacked my us for daring to suggest we interpret evidence cautiously rather than childishly reducing issues & acting like sensationalists, I am certain our publciation holds up well.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…