Instead of canceling math because we think Americans don't have the IQ to handle it, how about we copy the math education systems of countries who do it better than we do?
The frustrating thing about these math education debates is that the people trying to cancel math (yes, this is a loose figure of speech) seem to believe deeply and instinctively that American kids are dum-dums who can't learn math, so we should give up...
...But trying to convince these education policy people that IQ isn't the most important thing when it comes to math education (which is true) isn't super effective, because they already seem to spend all their time trying and failing to convince *themselves* of this very thing.
IQism is so deeply ingrained in American consciousness that even school-of-ed curricula that spend years trying to drum it out of teachers and ed policy people basically fail. All these folks still seem to believe (wrongly) that American kids innately can't learn math.
This makes American education policy debates incredibly frustrating for me, because I'm sitting here yelling "American kids CAN learn math", and the ed policy people are like "Yes, we agree, but we still have to cancel it because [reasons]".
Anyway, I stand by what @mileskimball and I wrote years ago. American kids CAN learn math, and they should learn math, and attempts to teach kids less math are deeply rooted in IQist fallacies.
Think about it. In crypto-land, Tether is the unit of account and the medium of exchange. Bitcoin is used a long-term store of value like gold, but Tether is money.
Tether is a free bank (because it prints its own dollars) that engages in fractional reserve banking (because its dollars are not actually backed 1-for-1 by USD asset reserves). It is the reinvention of the way we did money in the 19th century.
This guy isn't a tankie, but this kind of thinking -- we all have to just let (insert communist empire here) conquer whatever they want, because anything else equals full-scale nuclear annihilation -- pretty quickly leads to tankie conclusions.
The tankies themselves are this tiny irrelevant cabal of sickos. But there are a much larger number of leftists out there who are susceptible to the idea that the U.S. is the source of all conflict, that conquest by "communist" empires is actually resistance or liberation, etc.
Ideology is an intellectual muscle suit that people can strap on to feel smarter than they really are.
There are several reasons for this.
First, ideologies are group endeavors. When confronted with something you can't explain, you can usually find some co-ideologue who has "explained" it in ways that support the ideology. So you have a ton of off-the-shelf arguments.
Second, ideology provides psychic comfort that's similar to the feeling of actually getting something right. So you don't have to think too hard about stuff in order to get that good feeling of understanding it; you just repeat the catechism, and everything seems warm and truthy.
I mean, partly this is tankie ideas infecting mainstream socialism, but also partly this is the general American tendency to analyze foreign policy like a 12-year-old, saying "Hee hee, wouldn't it be cool if country X invaded country Y" because to you they're just lines on a map.
"Oh of course I'm antiwar, because all my friends are antiwar, and war is, like, so lame, you know, but like, wouldn't it also be cool if Country X totally invaded and conquered Country Y? I mean, Country Y has weird food, they kinda deserve it. Anyway let's go to the mall!"
29% of Americans are either Hispanic, Asian, or Middle Eastern -- more than double the percentage of Black Americans and about half the percentage of White Americans who are neither Hispanic nor Middle Eastern.
This third of America constitutes a "third race" that does not fit cleanly into America's traditional racial schema. It would be a grave mistake to assume that these folks will eventually become White; instead, I am betting that America's racial schema will bend and change.
Our media and our national narratives tend to ignore this "third race", except in very circumscribed cases. If anything, the push is to disaggregate each of these groups into their constituent ethnicities, instead of aggregating them as a big group that will change America.