Jason Kint Profile picture
Dec 15, 2021 16 tweets 6 min read Read on X
woah. new on DC docket. looks like the attorney general of DC filed 270 pages late Friday night documenting Facebook's multi-year resistance to discovery in its cover-up of Cambridge Analytica and related platform issues for 3yrs. stay with me until the end. /1
The most sensitive part is Facebook protecting these 4 executives from discovery/depositions. It's claimed to also be reason Zuckerberg was willing to pay $5B to the FTC.
It's an insult to every user a breach this problematic could happen without evidence from these 4 execs. /2
I mean this claim involved one of more infamous political operatives in DC at Facebook involved in a cover-up that protected the use of data in the most controversial election operation in history and allowed senior execs to continue to trade on the stock in the process. /3
for the employees and former employees (which Facebook permitted discovery), we can't see all of the queries that were done but some of the terms are certainly ones that have long been of interest. /4
so DC will play out, Facebook argues nothing new can be discovered from Zuckerberg, Sandberg, Schrage and Kaplan. It's all duplicative information and burdensome. Yes, that's patently absurd. Which brings me to the popcorn... /5
there's always been a parallel (multidistrict) case in N California and now it has worked through same issue. The Special Master assigned to sort out the similar discovery issues determined indeed it's likely Zuckerberg and Sandberg possess relevant and unique information. /6
And the plaintiffs want the communications between Sandberg and Zuckerberg, between the two of them and the board (some already turned over in very active shareholder suits), third parties and others missed. Again, this involves a cover-up. /7
The Court has given them until January 31, 2022. Again, this involves the files of Mark Zuckerberg and Sheryl Sandberg. /8
And they know Sandberg's role. Much is redacted but a reminder she has never answered questions under oath about the scandal as far as we know it. NYT reported the topic was off limits the one time she testified to Congress. She refused summons from international Parliaments. /9
it gets better. After the court ordered the documents search for Zuckerberg and Sandberg, Facebook quickly followed up to seal whatever discovery comes of it but now was just denied by the Court. I doubt it's over but it's a strong signal much should be publicly available. /10
now turning back to the DC case... a number of documents are sealed in the 270pg report just posted but beyond the unredacted discovery terms, we learn of a dispute over "Mr. Zuckerberg's notebooks" (infamous) being subject to discovery as they are in the California case. /11
And we also learn of some of the more recent depositions. Barnes was on the ground in 2016 election. Zuckerberg and Allison Hendrix have been noticed for depositions (key exec in platform data issues and was a point on Cambridge Analytica cover-up from early on). /12
and a reminder, the 270pg report is for more time. FB has been stalling and frustrating courts for nearly 4yrs. That's how they win. And it's patently absurd they get away with it considering there is nothing to give us confidence their largest scandal won't happen again. /13
and I'll add to close, there is a massive shareholder suit regarding same cover-up and almost zero press coverage of any of this because it's (a) complex and (b) Facebook's network convinced influencers Cambridge Analytica was an overhyped story. /eof
Also linking to this thread as it’s relevant to know we literally just learned after three years that Zuckerberg was deposed by the SEC on these matters back in 2019 and there is a sealed deposition transcript.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Jason Kint

Jason Kint Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @jason_kint

Dec 20
Justice takes time. What he knew when. AOC will remember this, “Their lawsuit says Zuckerberg—facing the risk of personal liability over the data privacy scandal—got himself out of trouble by agreeing to pay a larger-than-necessary $5 billion fine with shareholder money.” 1/3 Image
Here is the full report from Bloomberg on Zuckerberg’s deposition which apparently was cut short and late on docs on Dec 3rd. Board members Thiel, Andreessen, others all being deposed these weeks. Press allowed Facebook to rewrite history on this. 2/3 news.bloomberglaw.com/business-and-p…
Here is a good thread that will get you into the details. Sheryl Sandberg also deposed although her assumed prior SEC deposition was sealed. We did finally get Zuckerberg’s which showed his nerves and that the scandal was on his mind much earlier. Thanks to @zamaan_qureshi 3/3
Read 4 tweets
Dec 17
Overnight: FTC plans to call CEO Zuckerberg and (former) CTO Schroepfer in first 2 wks of trial (late April) in DC seeking to break up the company for abuse of monopoly laws. Also on their short list are some very big roles and names. Very likely driving behaviors at the top. /1 Image
As I know their roles...
Chris Cox - chief product officer who took a break when scandals accelerated, and avoided testimony in UK.
Javier Olivan - now COO, key lieutenant
Sheryl Sandberg - former COO, on everything
Alex Schultz - key growth hacker, now CMO /2
Adam Mosseri - key lieutenant, now runs Insta
Dave Wehner - former CFO, deal approval including $19B with no real revenue WhatsApp
Fidji Simo - (former) always in mix, product leadership
Guy Rosen - Onavo alleged packet sniffing of WhatsApp, Snap /3
Read 4 tweets
Dec 10
Woah. Google filed redacted versions of its Summary Judgment exhibits in Texas adtech antitrust case ahead of the March 31 trial. Although this case mirrors DOJ's case awaiting decision, it has even more eye-popping evidence. And an expert suggesting $29B in penalties. /1 Image
"Project Bernanke" is an oldie but goodie that gets a lot of discussion. ICYMI, Google would allegedly increase the first highest and the second highest bid in its 2nd-price auctions then reinvest the "saved" funds back into other bids to Google wins more auctions. /2 Image
The problem is while it may have ended up providing more revenue to the publisher (from/through Google) and no doubt to Google, Inc, it allegedly ignored the revenue which could have come through another channel if Google didn't manipulate the rev share as it ran the auctions. /3 Image
Read 13 tweets
Nov 25
US v Google II Closing arguments today.
70min for DOJ-> 95min for Google-> 20min for DOJ. Having predicted this case as better odds than search case (Google already lost in August), nothing changed my mind today. I wrote down: influence/$, complexity, deception, and arrogance. /1
I'm staying high level on perception first as findings of fact already covered much. On influence/$, DOJ pointed out early on and then again in rebuttal that every single witness presented by Google (except one) was paid or had grants from Google. /2
On complexity, Google again executed on its spaghetti defense with lead counsel, Karen Dunn, bookending trial by running over as she did in her opening. She appeared to skip dozens of slides, many minutes of close. And she loaded her slides while talking twice as fast as DOJ! /3
Read 11 tweets
Nov 21
Bam. There is it. US Department of Justice has filed - requesting divestiture of Chrome as a remedy for court's finding against Google. Android at risk, too. /1 Image
As it relates to Android, here is how DOJ puts it. Forced divestiture is option that "swiftly, efficiently, and decisively strikes at the locus of some anticompetitive conduct at issue here" but we're ok with tight behavioral remedies with option to divest if they don't work. /2 Image
Image
Revenue sharing for search default and/or preferential treatment - dead. Google's tens of billions to Apple - dead (last I saw it's about 15% of Apple's profits). Reminder, this all needs to be argued and approved by Court and then will get appealed. Still far off. /3 Image
Read 11 tweets
Nov 18
KA-BOOM. So when Google and its proxies (see so-called Chamber of Progress), friendly academics and analysts continue to suggest Chrome has nothing to do with the case, please ask them how many days they were at the trial. 1/3 Image
This is super important. It’s an area @DCNorg (premium publishers) are intensely interested and concerned they get right around ability to restrict. The Court and trial made it clear they understood its importance during trial. We’ll be reading closely on Wednesday. 2/3 Image
Here is the full report from Bloomberg who consistent with the entire trial showed up every day, did the hard work, and now got the massive scoop ahead of Wed filing. 3/3 bloomberg.com/news/articles/…
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(