@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 1/27》The Democrat Party is the party of crooked electioneering. I've personally been disenfranchised by them. When I left California, I had no State Senator, thanks to the Democrats’ schemes.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 2/27》After the 1980 census, in 1981, the Democrat-controlled State legislature gerrymandered California, to "protect" incumbent Democrat politicians, and get rid of as many Republicans as possible. They used every trick you can imagine, and some that you probably couldn't.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 3/27》Obviously, they drew convoluted districts, like Elbridge Gerry's infamous salamander, and they drew Democrat districts with fewer voters than Republican districts (which is made possible because apportionment is by number of bodies, not number of voters). But that's not all
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 4/27》The Calif State Constitution requires districts to be "geographically contiguous," but Democrats twisted that amazingly.

They drew districts that "crossed," so they were contiguous only at an infinitesimally small point.

One district was contiguous only at low tide!
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 5/27》They needed a few more Democrats to make the Marin Co. district of U.S. Rep. John Burton (not related to me, BTW) safely Democratic, because in 1980 he'd been reelected by an uncomfortably narrow margin, with just 51.1% of the vote. So guess what they did?
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 6/27》They extended his district across the Golden Gate Bridge, around the San Francisco shoreline (bypassing everyone who lived in San Francisco), down to Daly City, and picked up some Democrat precincts there, where they had Democrats to spare!

google.com/maps/place/Dal…
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 7/27》But none of those tricks matched what they did to get rid of Republicans in the California State Senate.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 8/27》California State Senators have staggered four year terms: those with odd-numbered seats are elected in the same year as Presidents, and even-numbered seats are elected in non-Presidential election years (two years earlier/later).
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 9/27》I was represented by Republican State Sen. Marz Garcia. He'd been elected in 1978 in an even-numbered district (Senate district 10), so in 1981 he had one more year on his term. His State Senate district was adjacent to that of another Republican, also with an even number.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 10/27》So the Democrats "double-bunked" them, drawing them into the same new district, to force them to run against each other.

Then they gave the new district an odd number, so that there'd be no election there for there more years.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 11/27》So, at the end of 1982, when the two Republican Senators' terms ended, the residents of the new district were left with no State Senator at all. They had no representation in the State Senate for two years, because odd-numbered districts didn't have an election until 1984.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 12/27》I left California before the next election. At the time I left, I had a State Assemblyman, but no State Senator.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 13/27》Over in Sacramento, they did the opposite. It was represented by a Republican with three years left on his term. They drew a new district similar to the old one, but gave it an even number, so that there would be an election there in 1982.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 14/27》The Republican was already in office with an odd-numbered district, so he couldn't run (you can't represent two districts at once).

He was the only well known Republican there, so the Democrats won the new district in 1982. For 2 years the district had two State Senators
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 15/27》(Technically, it was two districts, but they were mostly the same.)

In 1984 the Republican's term ran out, and since there was no election there until 1986, he left office, and the Sacramento district was left with only its new Democrat State Senator.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 16/27》Both Parties engage in gerrymandering, but when the Democrats controlled the North Carolina legislature, gerrymandering here in NC was probably worse than it has ever been in any Republican-controlled jurisdiction.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 17/27》Our NC State Constitution provided for multi-member Senate districts, and forbade splitting counties. The multi-member districts were needed so that the prohibition against splitting counties didn't result in gross disparities in voter representation/weight.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 18/27》Federal courts voided the prohibition against splitting counties, by requiring almost-exactly equal representation/weight per census-counted person, but NC still had multi-member districts (until they were abolished in Stephenson v. Bartlett, in 2002).
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 19/27》In 1991, the Democrats then in charge in the legislature used multi-member Senate districts for racial gerrymandering, to maximize the number of seats "safe" for white Democrats.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 20/27》They used multi-member Senate districts to "dilute" mostly-black urban precincts with suburban & rural precincts from other counties that were whiter & more Republican. The goal was to draw districts too Democratic to elect Republicans & too white to elect black Democrats.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 21/27》The purpose was to keep both Republicans and black Democrats out of the legislature. It was outrageous, and racist, and blatant, and extremely unjust -- and you rarely heard a peep of complaint about it from the liberal press.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 22/27》In those days I used to watch the returns come in, at election parties. You'd see Republican legislative districts which often had twice as many total votes as Democrat legislative districts.

That's the effect of Democrats subverting the ideal of "one person = one vote."
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 23/27》They've done their best, for many years, to make it more like "one person = ⅔ vote in Republican districts, but one person = 1⅓ vote in Democrat districts."
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 24/27》For example, they manipulate the census to count college students in college towns, instead of in the hometowns where they’re registered. That gives liberal college towns disproportionate legislative representation, and conservative rural districts less representation.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 25/27》Democratic election trickery and fraud is nothing new. In fact it wasn't even new when they staged the Wilmington coup, in 1898.

What, you say you've never heard of the Democrats' Wilmington Coup? That really WAS an armed insurrection.

history.com/news/wilmingto…
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 26/27》That was only 22 years after the infamous election of 1876, in which massive voter intimidation & fraud by Democrats left America forever in doubt about who really won the Presidency.
@DLaneBreckenri1 @lyndonallydice @danielcincu @robert_zubrin @McFaul @ClaireBerlinski 27/27》So, do you wonder why so many Republicans don't trust Democrats to count votes -- or draw districts -- honestly?

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with ✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton

✝️ 🇺🇸 🇺🇦 Dave Burton Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ncdave4life

Jan 23, 2025
1/4. Rising CO2 levels improve plants' water use efficiency and drought resilience, through reduced stomatal conductance. Simply put, plants need to process less air to get the carbon they need for growth, and thus they lose less water to transpiration.
x.com/ncdave4life/st…

That's one of the reasons that catastrophic famines no longer happen. For all of of human history, until recently, famine was one of the great scourges of mankind: the "Third Horseman of the Apocalypse." But widespread famines are fading from living memory, and rising atmospheric CO2 concentration is one of the reasons for that.

That's a very, very Big Deal. For comparison:

● COVID-19 killed about 0.1% of the world's population
● The catastrophic 1918 flu pandemic killed about 2%
● WWII killed 2.7% of the world's population
● But the nearly-worldwide drought and famine of 1876-78 killed about 3.7% of the world's population.
@Panta_Rhei06 @simonmaechling --

2/4. Improved water use efficiency and drought resilience are especially beneficial in arid regions, like the Sahel, which is one of the reasons that region of Africa is "greening" even faster than most other places.
Image
3/4. I asked ChatGPT about that benefit of CO2 emissions and rising CO2 levels:

"With reference to the agronomy literature, quantify how elevated CO2 helps plants use water more efficiently, and increases crops' drought resilience, by reducing stomatal conductance and water loss through transpiration."

ChatGPT replied with a very good answer:

In agronomy, the effects of elevated CO2 on plant water use efficiency and drought resilience are extensively studied. One of the key mechanisms through which elevated CO2 levels improve water use efficiency is by reducing stomatal conductance and, consequently, water loss through transpiration.

Stomata are small pores on the surface of plant leaves that regulate gas exchange, including the uptake of CO2 for photosynthesis and the release of water vapor through transpiration. When CO2 levels are elevated, plants can maintain the same or higher rate of photosynthesis while reducing stomatal conductance. This reduction in stomatal conductance leads to a decrease in water loss through transpiration without significantly affecting CO2 uptake, resulting in improved water use efficiency.

Several studies have quantified the effect of elevated CO2 on stomatal conductance and transpiration. For example, a meta-analysis published in 2013 (Kimball et al., 2013) found that under elevated CO2 levels, stomatal conductance decreased by an average of 22%, while transpiration decreased by only 17%. This indicates that plants under elevated CO2 levels were able to reduce water loss more efficiently than they reduced CO2 uptake, leading to an overall improvement in water use efficiency.

Improvements in water use efficiency due to elevated CO2 levels can increase plants' drought resilience by allowing them to maintain adequate hydration during periods of water scarcity. This can be particularly beneficial in arid and semi-arid regions where water availability is limited.

Overall, the literature suggests that elevated CO2 levels can improve water use efficiency in plants by reducing stomatal conductance and water loss through transpiration, which can enhance their resilience to drought conditions.
Read 5 tweets
Jan 12, 2025
1/6》 Marcus, please tell me that you're not fooled by a fake "study" of a three-day-old event, from a climate industry propaganda outlet. Do you know how long real studies take?

This is the real global trend:
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
@Marcusgibson @WeatherProf 2/6》 NASA measures it from MODIS satellites. They show a decreasing trend in fires.
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/145421/…
archive.ph/WfDJh
earthobservatory.nasa.gov/images/90493/r…
@Marcusgibson @WeatherProf 3/6》 The main factors affecting fires are land management and forestry practices.
phys.org/news/2022-11-1…
forestpolicypub.com/2021/07/30/gri…
Global warming has negligible impact on wildfires.
Read 7 tweets
Jan 11, 2025
1/8. Gov. Newsom's press release falsely blames "a hotter, drier world." In fact, the world is warming only very slightly & slowly, and it hasn't gotten at all drier. Here're the facts:
sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
As you can see from the graph, the fraction of the globe in drought has decreased slightly, not increased.

Oh, and BTW, NCA4 (circa 2018) estimated that global average temperatures have risen only 1.14 ±0.13°C since the 1800s, and the warming is disproportionately at chilly high latitudes.Image
2/8. Also, higher CO2 levels greatly reduce drought impacts, by making plants more drought-resistant and water-efficient, through reduced stomatal conductance. That's very beneficial in arid regions, like the Sahel & much of California. Here's an article.
web.archive.org/web/2017061915…
That's is one of the reasons that region of Africa is "greening" even faster than most other places.

@NewScientist reported the "remarkable environmental turnaround," including a “quite spectacular regeneration of vegetation,” and "a 70 per cent increase in yields of local cereals such as sorghum and millet in one province in recent years."
@WeatherProf 3/8. National Geographic @NatGeo also wrote about it.
web.archive.org/web/2009080201…

sealevel.info/Owen2009_Sahar…
Read 9 tweets
Oct 10, 2024
1/8》Doc wrote, "You’re not going to change my mind."

Please do not be impervious to evidence, like trillionofcells. That would make me sad.Image
2/8》Doc wrote, "Wasn’t Gleick cleared of any wrongdoing?"

No, he was not cleared. That was disinformation from The Grauniad:
x.com/ncdave4life/st…

In fact, Gleick eventually admitted the identity theft, and disseminating the forgery & the stolen documents (though only after he was caught & publicly identified).

I can see that you didn't read my article about it. You should:
sealevel.info/Peter_Gleick_D…
3/8》Gleick never admitted being the forger, but there can be no doubt of that, either.

It was the incongruous appearance of his name in the document, with the strangely flattering description of him as a "high-profile climate scientist," in a document which said NOTHING positive about ANY other climate activists, which first drew Steve Mosher's attention to Gleick. But it was the idiosyncrasies of Gleick's own writing style, found in the forged document, which Mosher mostly discussed, when explaining why he believed Gleick wrote it.

Mosher explained it, at length, in a series of blog comments, beginning here:
rankexploits.com/musings/2012/t…

Note that that was all BEFORE Gleick confessed to being the person who had impersonated the Heartland Board Member to steal the other documents. THAT iced it: there's no question that Gleick was the forger.

(BTW, Mosher used to be with Berkeley Earth.)
Read 9 tweets
Oct 2, 2024
1/8. The IPCC authors expect  a worsening trend. No such trend is actually detectable, so far.

In fact, here's a paper about the downward  trend in hurricane destructiveness, tho I suspect the decrease might be a fluctuation rather than a durable trend.
nature.com/articles/ncomm…
2/8. The IPCC authors are sly. They know hurricanes & other tropical cyclones aren't worse, but they dodge & weave to avoid admitting it. Here's a tricky quote from AR6:

"It is likely that the global proportion of Category 3–5 tropical cyclone instances has increased over the past four decades."

ref: ipcc.ch/report/ar6/wg1…
3/8. That's a textbook illustration of Chesterton's point:

"Falsehood is never so false as when it is very nearly true."

It's "spin." It is calculated deception without QUITE lying.

Look at that graph again:

(Updated version: )climatlas.com/tropical/globa…Image
Read 9 tweets
Aug 14, 2024
@JamesFaris_ & @BusinessInsider, here's reality:

Hurricanes and other tropical cyclones:


tl;dr: Hurricanes are not worsening.

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
climatlas.com/tropical/globa…Image
Tornadoes:


tl;dr: Tornadoes are not worsening.

sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
climateataglance.com/wp-content/upl…Image
Droughts & floods:


tl;dr: Droughts & floods are not worsening.



sealevel.info/learnmore.html…
ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitor…
sealevel.info/US_percentage_…Image
Read 7 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(