I finished the Rise and Fall of Mars Hill last week and have been letting it simmer before I share my perspective.

So here goes.

My biggest issue with the podcast is its refusal to engage with the toxic theology beneath all the abuse.

Namely, white supremacy and patriarchy…
When churches and leaders who ascribe to a certain belief systems continue to be exposed as oppressive and abusive, we have to ask if the system itself is broken.

Rotten fruit often comes from toxic theology.
In every intro we heard Jen Smith say, “Why are we not looking at the deep-seated reasons for this?”

Every episode I would hear that and pray it would be the one where they'd actually examine the underlying belief systems, but as the credits rolled each time I was disappointed.
A “culture of celebrity,” “the advance of media,” and a “lack of accountability” are handed most of the blame throughout the podcast, while white supremacy and patriarchy get a pass.
I certainly don’t think the podcast was all bad. Not remotely so.

I think Mike Cosper did a really good job in a really difficult situation (I’ll talk more about that in a second) and I think he genuinely wanted to help abuse survivors from Mars Hill.
It also seems like it has been helpful for some former Mars Hill members and staff. Many of them mentioned on the podcast that last few months have led to conversations and reconciliation.

I was particularly touched by the interaction between Jen Smith and Sutton Turner.
It was helpful for me too.

In my early 20s, I worked at a church that was like Mars Hill in a number of ways and for a pastor who shared many toxic traits with Mark Driscoll.

They were friends, in fact.
I cried in my car a number of times as stories and testimonies triggered my own experiences.

The first time I heard a clip of Mark yelling “who in the hell do you think you are?!” I started to shake.

One of the toxic traits my pastor shared with Mark was yelling like that.
My guess is that Mark has some form of narcissism and/or anti-social personality disorder, which makes it easy to point to him as an aberration instead of examining the belief systems that enabled and even propelled his meteoric rise.
Mark may be unique, but the toxic theology that undergirds him is not.

So much of evangelicalism is infected with the twin cancers of patriarchy and white supremacy.
Patriarchal white men made every single decision at Mars Hill. Patriarchal white men were also the ones supposed to be providing accountability to Mark.

This is the equivalent of cops investigating their own crimes or judges ruling on cases in which they are the defendants.
One of the most frustrating parts of the podcast was the repeated suggestion that Mark would have been fine if he’d just submitted to a different group of patriarchal white men.

Are you kidding me?
But it’s understandable.

Christianity Today’s Executive Leadership Team is 88% white and 88% male.

To do a thorough examination of white male supremacy would be like sawing off the limb upon which they stand.
I think this is why Cosper would not interview Stephanie Drury (@StuffCCLikes) and some other early critics of Mars Hill.

It's also why many of the interviews with critics were shortened and heavily edited (according to those interviewed that I have privately corresponded with).
These critics were set on doing what the podcast refused to do—rooting out the toxic theology beneath all the rotten fruit.

Also, there was zero repentance from Christianity Today for their significant role in applauding and platforming Mark during his rise.
Like Jesse Bryan said on the podcast:

“It’s easy for them to distance themselves right now, but I would just love to hear one of them say, ‘you know what, this totally so jacked up. We should have never done it and we ruined a lot of people’s lives. And I took the money.’”
My worry is that we will chalk up the fall of Mars Hill to an aberrant and destructive leader like Mark Driscoll without ever considering the toxic theology and systemic sin that made it possible for him to rise in the first place.
But my hope is that we will take Jen Smith’s advice and look at the deep-seated reasons for this.

And when we do, I pray we can root out the evils of white supremacy and patriarchy before they do even more damage.

/end

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Zach W. Lambert

Zach W. Lambert Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ZachWLambert

7 Dec
People aren’t deconstructing because it’s “sexy” or because they want to sin.

People are deconstructing because many of the folks who first told them about Jesus have stopped living like him.

Thread:
I’ve talked to hundreds of people about this and never met a single person who chose to start deconstructing, myself included.

Deconstruction is involuntary; it happens when something we’ve been told to believe comes into conflict with something we experience.

For example…
We were told Christians value ethics and morals, but then we watched them give full-throated support to Donald Trump.

We were told Christians welcome everyone into God’s family, but then we saw LGTBQ+ folks diligently following Jesus be kicked out of the church.
Read 9 tweets
27 Sep
Many of Haiti's ongoing issues are the direct result of reparations.

Not reparations paid to formerly enslaved people and their descendants. That has never happened.

These reparations were paid to enslavers by the people they enslaved.

a thread
In 1791, self-liberated slaves rose up against French colonial rule and what became known as the Haitian Revolution began.

It ended in 1804 with Haiti declaring its independence from France, but the French refused to recognize Haitian independence for another 20 years.
In 1825, King Charles X said France would recognize Haiti’s independence, but it with a cost.

Haiti was required to pay former French slaveowners 150 million francs (~$21 billion today) because they claimed to have lost income when they could no longer enslave the Haitians.
Read 17 tweets
30 Aug
In preparation for a time of prayer this morning, I tried to locate the number of lives lost in the Kabul suicide bombing.

I already know the US troops (13), but I was trying to find the number of Afghans who died.

I skimmed 20 different articles and couldn’t find it.

1/
I checked CNN, Fox News, MSNBC, USA Today, CBS, The Wall Street Journal, The Washington Post, The New York Times, Reuters, AP, NPR, and everywhere else I could think of.

Nothing.

Just words like “dozens” or “many” but no actual number of Afghan casualties.

2/
I finally found the number on Wikipedia.

169.

One hundred and sixty-nine Afghan civilians died and most of our major news media barely even mentions them.

3/
Read 6 tweets
28 Aug
“Every gun that is made, every warship launched, every rocket fired signifies, in the final sense, a theft from those who hunger and are not fed, those who are cold and are not clothed.

1/
This world in arms is not spending money alone.

It is spending the sweat of its laborers, the genius of its scientists, the hopes of its children.

2/
The cost of one modern heavy bomber is this: a modern brick school in more than 30 cities.

It is two electric power plants, each serving a town of 60,000 population.

It is two fine, fully equipped hospitals.

It is some fifty miles of concrete pavement.

3/
Read 7 tweets
28 Jun
It was both hard and beautiful to walk our church through a conversation with @kkdumez about Jesus and John Wayne today.

For those who grew up in white evangelicalism, I can’t overstate how much J&JW is the story of our lives. This is a picture of my wife when she was 7…

1/
A John Wayne impersonator visited my wife’s church in 1996 as he toured around the country—something he did for 4 decades.

He preached the combination of Christianity and militant masculinity (literally Jesus and John Wayne) that pervaded the first 25 years of our lives.

2/
My wife’s story is not unique. After we heard from @kkdumez during the @RestoreATX gathering this morning, I hosted an open zoom discussion for anyone wanting to talk about the themes of J&JW. I heard story after story of the damage that militant masculinity has caused.

3/
Read 10 tweets
5 Mar
A quick thread about the devastating affects of white evangelical fear-mongering. It is severely damaging the witness of the Church and causing people immense pain.

I just got off the phone with an amazingly kind and loving member of our church. She was in tears...

1/
She helped with Operation Christmas Child awhile back and was subsequently added (without consent) to Franklin Graham's email list.

Lately she has been inundated with fear-mongering emails about how all the "dangerous threats to our nation" and to "life as we know it."

2/
The "Secular Left" is going to fire people for "using the wrong name or pronouns" and force churches to "hire people hostile to its deeply held beliefs" and strip accreditation from schools that "do not satisfy the demands of the secular Left" and more.

3/
Read 6 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(