Ed Hagen Profile picture
Dec 15, 2021 22 tweets 9 min read Read on X
A new pre-print w/ @AaronDBlackwell, @adlightner & Sullivan that weaves together human carnivory, shamanism, & encaphalization.

"We propose that in the story of human evolution, which has long featured hunters, healers had an equal role to play"

🧵 1/n

osf.io/76bka
2. We tackle two mysteries. First, human brain size tripled since the start of the Pleistocene.

Why?
3. Second, today, we consume huge quantities of plant substances with few nutrients but many secondary compounds.

Why?
4. A standard story of encephalization (which we endorse) is that brain expansion was fueled by a high-quality diet, but hunting was also cognitively demanding, selecting for greater cognitive abilities.
5. We argue, however, that fighting pathogens was also cognitively demanding (as I'll explain below), and that pathogen pressure shifted, and perhaps increased with the increase in carnivory in Homo c. 2.6 mya. This was another selection pressure for encephalization.
6. We (and many others) propose that the transition to carnivory, which increased the quantity of meat in the diet (@HermanPontzer @bendormiki @BrianaPobiner), lowered the barriers to zoonotic pathogen spillover
7. Today, most human infectious diseases originate in non-human animals -- spillover. Unlike plants, mammalian prey are infected with pathogens that can often infect humans (plant foods can be contaminated with animal feces, but plant pathogens rarely infect humans)
8. Today, hunting is a major risk factor for spillover, both in commercial hunters...
9. ...and in hunter-gatherers
10. There is also evidence of Plio-Pleistocene zoonotic spillovers into the human lineage
11. Did the shift to carnivory shift pathogen pressure? Newly emerging pathogens are poorly adapted to the new host -> infect tissues that are v. harmful to us, eg nervous system but don't support onward transmission. Did Homo need new strategy to defend against brain infections?
12. Pathogen pressure might also have *increased* in Homo. Newly emerging viruses have wide range of case fatality rates, which on average are higher than those of endemic viral infections.

More spillover -> selection for new pathogen defense strategies in Homo?
13. Increase in body size, range size, and longevity in Homo might also have increased investment in immunity (but lower population density and decreased polygyny might have decreased it)
14. If carnivory shifted/increased pathogen pressure in Homo, there should be evidence of immune divergence compared to chimps, and there is: humans have low stomach pH, diff CMAH/SIGLEC biology, extreme sensitivity to LPS @JF_Brinkworth, diff salivary proteome @gokcumen & more
15. Our bodies seem to recognize that animal foods pose a pathogen threat -- they increase inflammatory responses -- whereas plant foods are often anti-inflammatory (perhaps because they are anti-infective) @JoeAlcockMD
16. We argue that increased immune investment against increased zoonotic pathogen pressure also involved increased cognitive abilities. Shamans and healers are often highly respected for their knowledge and intelligence
17. The local flora provides thousands of potentially anti-pathogen pharmaceutical compounds that healers must master
18. There is also considerable evidence that spices have positive health effects against infectious and other diseases
19. There is also considerable evidence that traditional medicine offers real benefits. In a survey of the ethnographic record, we found evidence for prestigious teachers @JoHenrich, feared diviners @mnvrsngh, and efficacious healers @adlightner
20. Final argument: how to defend the brain from increased zoonotic disease? Psychotropic drugs! They cross the blood-brain barrier, are toxic to many parasites, and can therefore treat infections of the CNS.
21. An intriguing example. T. solium is a tapeworm that spilled over from hyenas to the human lineage 2-3 mya, and it can infect the brain. Today, one of the most popular "recreational" drugs in Asia -- betel nut -- is effective against this parasite. Coincidence? Maybe.
22. That's it. Comments welcome!

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Ed Hagen

Ed Hagen Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @ed_hagen

Apr 9
1. According to some, this article provides strong empirical evidence for nonbinary biological sex, so I took a look.

tl;dr: ironically, the article reinforces the case for binary biological sex. 🧵
academic.oup.com/icb/article/63…
2. First, a refresher:

Sexual reproduction, the recombination of two parental genomes into one offspring genome, is very widespread in eukaryotes. This 2→1 mode of reproduction has many evolutionary consequences...
3. In a very wide range of eurkaryotic species, parental genomes are each packaged into cells (gametes) that exhibit:

* Disassortative fusion
* Dimorphic size
* Dimorphic motility
Read 23 tweets
Apr 6
1. Much human genetic variation is phenotypically meaningless. Why? Cooperative genes are locked in a forever war w/ selfish genes. The cooperative genes have won most battles but now our genomes are littered with the dead & decaying bodies of a million selfish genes. 🧵 AI generated image of cooperative warriors blasting an enemy warrior
2. Genome sizes vary tremendously in ways that do not obviously relate to organism complexity, e.g., many fish and amphibians have huge genomes compared to mammals (note that the number of base pairs on the x-axis is on a log scale):
en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_si…
Plot showing that within and across major taxonomic groups, genome size varies by orders of magnitude
3. Why?

The explanation requires the Williams/Dawkins concept of selfish genetic elements that "enhance their own transmission at the expense of other genes in the genome, even if this has no or a negative effect on organismal fitness": journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a…
Book covers of Adaptation and Natural Selection (Williams) and The Selfish Gene (Dawkins)
Read 17 tweets
Feb 12
1. What do we know about hunter-gatherers (HG)? This is the go-to book, first published in 1995, w/ a 2nd edition in 2013. Here's an overview of the book that I hope will encourage @NPR, @sciam, & others to consult it when reporting on & evaluating the import of new HG studies 🧵 The Lifeways of Hunter-Gatherers: The foraging spectrum by Robert Kelly, Second Edition
2. The key theme is that HGs vary a lot, hence the word *Spectrum* in the subtitle, but in principled ways that are best understood in a human behavioral ecology (HBE) framework: The Lifeways of Hunter-Gatherers. In this book, Robert L. Kelly challenges the preconception that hunter-gatherers should conform to a single type, be that of Paleolithic relics living in a raw state of nature, the original affluent society, or downtrodden proletariat. Instead, he crafts a position that emphasizes diversity in foraging lifeways and efforts to explain that diversity. Kelly reviews the anthropological literature for variation among living foragers in terms of diet, mobility, sharing, land tenure, technology, exchange, male-female relations, division of labor, marriage, descen...
3. The Preface recounts the sensationalist "discovery" of the Tasady, widely reported in the media as Stone Age relics, which was later debunked. A cautionary tale: I remember that I was amazed, amazed at the faces of Tasaday men and women looking back at me from the pages of National Geographic in 1972. To a young high school student who yearned to visit exotic places and to study prehistoric peoples, those photos of the Tasaday afforded the opportunity to do both vicariously. Here was the Stone Age! Hunters and gatherers, unsullied by civilization, who lived "much as our ancestors did thousands of years ago" (MacLeish and Launois 1972: 219). Anthropology, the Tasaday, and, I like to think, I myself have come a long way since 1972. The Tasad...
Read 15 tweets
Dec 18, 2023
1. The causes and consequences of two biological sexes.

A 🧵 that mostly follows Parker (2014) The sexual cascade: doi.org/10.1101/cshper…
The sexual cascade (succession of evolutionary events leading to Darwinian sexual selection) (pink boxes and arrows) showing main transitions and selective forces (white boxes and black arrows) and alternative stable states (blue boxes and arrows). The transitions (A-F) are explained in the text.
2. Major points:

Binary biological sex is not a system to exhaustively categorize every living thing.

Instead, it plays key causal roles in the evolution of many traits across the eukaryotes.

A preview of our journey [syngamy: fusion of two gametes] (Parker 2014): EVOLUTION OF SEXUAL STRATEGIES: THE SEXUAL CASCADE The various evolutionary adaptations surrounding sexuality have presented a formidable challenge for evolutionary biologists and many, from meiosis to sexual selection and sexual con-flict, continue to generate debate. Here and elsewhere (Parker and Pizzari, in press), a deductive approach is developed that seeks to explain sexuality as a sequence of events within a causal framework. It is important to distinguish between irreversible evolutionary transitions that are ubiquitous and fixed in most extant advanced animal taxa and more labile ...
3. Two sexes are ultimately a consequence of sex. Sex (meiosis & fusion of 2 gametes) was present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor, a single-celled organism. (But no sexes yet!)

Sex is a ubiquitous, ancient, & inherent attribute of eukaryotic life: pnas.org/doi/full/10.10…
A eukaryotic phylogeny showing the presence or absence of sex or sex-related genes
Read 25 tweets
Nov 26, 2023
1. Haas et al. argue that projectile points buried with women indicate they hunted big game in communal hunts:

Or?

In many hunter gatherer societies, the owner of the weapon owns the meat, even if he or she did not participate in the hunt. 🧵
2. In the !Kung, for example, the owner of the arrow owns the meat, and men often use arrows borrowed from many others, including from women, who typically do not hunt. Lee (1979): books.google.com/books?id=9085A…
The ! Kung rule for allocating ownership of the meat from a kill is "the owner of the arrow is the owner of the meat." This holds true even if the owner of the arrow is not the man who shot it. (If two or more arrows hit an animal, the owner of the first arrow shot gets credit for the kill.) Ownership in the !Kung context consists primarily of the right to distrib ute the meat formally. Disputes over ownership are rare; in fact, the man take steps to blur the credits for a kill by circulating their arrows in the traditional haro trading system. A man will say to another, "Giv...
3. There is a similar custom in most Central African foragers (although ownership of the hunting implement, such as a net, can be complicated). Ichikawa (2005): books.google.com/books?id=HG5AE…
Another important social aspect of tool use is ownership. Even among egalitarian hunter-gatherer societies in central Africa, the owner of the game is clearly defined,' although 'owner' in their language often conveys different but related meanings depending on the context, such as 'host', guardian', "master', as well as 'owner' in the Western sense. In most cases, the owner of the animal is the owner of the hunting tool with which the animal is killed.? For an animal killed with a spear, the owner of the animal is the owner of the spear that gave the first fatal blow to the animal. Fo...
Read 7 tweets
Apr 14, 2023
1. In evolutionary psychology (EP), what is genetically coded?

* Behavior? No
* Psychological mechanisms or modules? No
* Developmental programs? Yes!

A brief tweetorial 🧵 Homologous hox genes in suc...
2. Humans start off as a single fertilized cell that, over 9 months, develops into an intricately structured, 2 trillion cell infant, and over 20 years, into a 30 trillion cell adult.
nature.com/articles/s4158…
3. 170 billion of those cells constitute the brain

Human brain organogenesis: Toward a cellular understanding of development and disease sciencedirect.com/science/articl… Key human brain development...
Read 18 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(