2. We tackle two mysteries. First, human brain size tripled since the start of the Pleistocene.
Why?
3. Second, today, we consume huge quantities of plant substances with few nutrients but many secondary compounds.
Why?
4. A standard story of encephalization (which we endorse) is that brain expansion was fueled by a high-quality diet, but hunting was also cognitively demanding, selecting for greater cognitive abilities.
5. We argue, however, that fighting pathogens was also cognitively demanding (as I'll explain below), and that pathogen pressure shifted, and perhaps increased with the increase in carnivory in Homo c. 2.6 mya. This was another selection pressure for encephalization.
6. We (and many others) propose that the transition to carnivory, which increased the quantity of meat in the diet (@HermanPontzer@bendormiki@BrianaPobiner), lowered the barriers to zoonotic pathogen spillover
7. Today, most human infectious diseases originate in non-human animals -- spillover. Unlike plants, mammalian prey are infected with pathogens that can often infect humans (plant foods can be contaminated with animal feces, but plant pathogens rarely infect humans)
8. Today, hunting is a major risk factor for spillover, both in commercial hunters...
9. ...and in hunter-gatherers
10. There is also evidence of Plio-Pleistocene zoonotic spillovers into the human lineage
11. Did the shift to carnivory shift pathogen pressure? Newly emerging pathogens are poorly adapted to the new host -> infect tissues that are v. harmful to us, eg nervous system but don't support onward transmission. Did Homo need new strategy to defend against brain infections?
12. Pathogen pressure might also have *increased* in Homo. Newly emerging viruses have wide range of case fatality rates, which on average are higher than those of endemic viral infections.
More spillover -> selection for new pathogen defense strategies in Homo?
13. Increase in body size, range size, and longevity in Homo might also have increased investment in immunity (but lower population density and decreased polygyny might have decreased it)
14. If carnivory shifted/increased pathogen pressure in Homo, there should be evidence of immune divergence compared to chimps, and there is: humans have low stomach pH, diff CMAH/SIGLEC biology, extreme sensitivity to LPS @JF_Brinkworth, diff salivary proteome @gokcumen & more
15. Our bodies seem to recognize that animal foods pose a pathogen threat -- they increase inflammatory responses -- whereas plant foods are often anti-inflammatory (perhaps because they are anti-infective) @JoeAlcockMD
16. We argue that increased immune investment against increased zoonotic pathogen pressure also involved increased cognitive abilities. Shamans and healers are often highly respected for their knowledge and intelligence
17. The local flora provides thousands of potentially anti-pathogen pharmaceutical compounds that healers must master
18. There is also considerable evidence that spices have positive health effects against infectious and other diseases
19. There is also considerable evidence that traditional medicine offers real benefits. In a survey of the ethnographic record, we found evidence for prestigious teachers @JoHenrich, feared diviners @mnvrsngh, and efficacious healers @adlightner
20. Final argument: how to defend the brain from increased zoonotic disease? Psychotropic drugs! They cross the blood-brain barrier, are toxic to many parasites, and can therefore treat infections of the CNS.
21. An intriguing example. T. solium is a tapeworm that spilled over from hyenas to the human lineage 2-3 mya, and it can infect the brain. Today, one of the most popular "recreational" drugs in Asia -- betel nut -- is effective against this parasite. Coincidence? Maybe.
22. That's it. Comments welcome!
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
2. First, please read this excellent article on the Lynn dataset, which details its racist origins (Lynn: "predominantly white states should declare independence and secede from the Union")... statnews.com/2024/06/20/ric…
3. ...and which also details its deep empirical flaws, such as "selectively includ[ing] samples with particularly low scores for sub-Saharan Africa, while disregarding those with higher scores":
2. Recently @dconroybeam penned an Op-Ed on the harmful use of cherry-picked EP research, citing examples of mass shooters linked to EP-inspired manosphere ideology. He called on EP to do more to "defend our work from misappropriation"
3. Then, @sentientist pushed back, expanding the discussion to racial killings, HG research, and politics, and absolving EP and HG research from responsibility for the bad behavior of others with this central claim:
Sexual reproduction, the recombination of two parental genomes into one offspring genome, is very widespread in eukaryotes. This 2→1 mode of reproduction has many evolutionary consequences...
3. In a very wide range of eurkaryotic species, parental genomes are each packaged into cells (gametes) that exhibit:
1. Much human genetic variation is phenotypically meaningless. Why? Cooperative genes are locked in a forever war w/ selfish genes. The cooperative genes have won most battles but now our genomes are littered with the dead & decaying bodies of a million selfish genes. 🧵
2. Genome sizes vary tremendously in ways that do not obviously relate to organism complexity, e.g., many fish and amphibians have huge genomes compared to mammals (note that the number of base pairs on the x-axis is on a log scale): en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Genome_si…
3. Why?
The explanation requires the Williams/Dawkins concept of selfish genetic elements that "enhance their own transmission at the expense of other genes in the genome, even if this has no or a negative effect on organismal fitness": journals.plos.org/plosgenetics/a…
1. What do we know about hunter-gatherers (HG)? This is the go-to book, first published in 1995, w/ a 2nd edition in 2013. Here's an overview of the book that I hope will encourage @NPR, @sciam, & others to consult it when reporting on & evaluating the import of new HG studies 🧵
2. The key theme is that HGs vary a lot, hence the word *Spectrum* in the subtitle, but in principled ways that are best understood in a human behavioral ecology (HBE) framework:
3. The Preface recounts the sensationalist "discovery" of the Tasady, widely reported in the media as Stone Age relics, which was later debunked. A cautionary tale:
Binary biological sex is not a system to exhaustively categorize every living thing.
Instead, it plays key causal roles in the evolution of many traits across the eukaryotes.
A preview of our journey [syngamy: fusion of two gametes] (Parker 2014):
3. Two sexes are ultimately a consequence of sex. Sex (meiosis & fusion of 2 gametes) was present in the last eukaryotic common ancestor, a single-celled organism. (But no sexes yet!)