Hey, @CedarParkPatch, @KUT, and @KVUE: in covering the commissioners’ denial of funds to @LeanderISD & @RoundRockISD over “X-rated” books, you should look at the fact that my book & others are also in libraries of schools in districts that WERE funded.
A simple library catalog search reveals the inconsistency. All of the districts have books like OUT OF DARKNESS because these highly vetted and celebrated works of literature serve the needs of students.
In all cases, the books in question are options AVAILABLE to readers, not required course material. The only difference is that the targeted districts have struggled with politicized public controversies. Where is the fact checking? We need to hold these officials accountable.
It is wrong to withhold funds from students as punishment for a district’s struggles with attacks on youth access to books. It is all theater, and it’s time to call out the politicians—from @GregAbbott_TX to Rep Kraus to some commissioners—who are pumping it for political gain.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
ICYMI, book banning is now being pushed by county officials in Texas. This week Williamson County commissioners withheld CARES funds from @LeanderISD & @RoundRockISD based on false allegations about "X-rated" material available. More thoughts & links ahead in thread.
Good start coverage from @mikemarut of @KVUE here, but we need to put a finer point on these issues and get eyes on the situation. Because as with Abbott and Mike Kraus's claims--this is politically motivated & NOT ABOUT THE BOOKS.
How do I know? Because districts that DID receive funds--like @GeorgetownISD--also have targeted books like OUT OF DARKNESS available to students... AS THEY SHOULD. These highly vetted & celebrated works of literature serve the needs of students. (See "additional info" below.)
Hey folks, if you're tired of posts about book banning... join the club! But here's a thread on why we can't stop talking about it--and why you should register for this @PENamerica Teach-In TONIGHT, 8-9:30 pm EST. bit.ly/3pN2Kmd
Attacks on youth access to books are not letting up, and in some places, the costs for students are just getting higher. This week, in Central TX county commissioners withheld funds from @LeanderISD & @RoundRockISD in response to false claims of "X-rated" books in their schools.
As the author of one of these allegedly "x-rated" books & a former Texas HS teacher, I know that these claims are NOT based in reading--or even a middle-school understanding of literature. It's shameful political theater, but the harm to students is real.
It is emphatically NOT my responsibility, as a sexual abuse survivor, to educate those who falsely label YA lit "grooming" just because it contains sexual content of some kind. But I'm sick of the slimy implications being wiped like snot over our books. So I will spell this out.
"Grooming" is manipulative, predatory behavior, usually of a minor, with the goal of blurring the lines between appropriate and inappropriate touch or interaction. Why? A disoriented, gaslit, self-blaming target is much less likely to be able to identify, or report, abuse.
It is absurd to say that the mere presence of some sexual content means a book is "grooming" readers. Is the sexual content of the Bible "grooming" readers to be gang raped? to sleep with their fathers? Do TV shows with love-making scenes or song that refer to sex "groom"?
When it comes to school book bans, we need a powerful community response that puts students first and backs up teachers and librarians. That response starts with a clear understanding of what is happening. Here's what I see going on as of 12/4/21.
Attacks on youth access to books in schools often use misleading terms like “pornographic,” “inappropriate,” “controversial,” & “divisive” to describe books by or about non-white or non-dominant people, &/or that address experiences such as sexual assault or police brutality.
The scope of these attacks varies from 1 book to TX State Rep Kraus’s bogus interrogation of school districts about whether 850 allegedly problematic books are in their libraries. (Kraus's list is a sloppy combo of keyword searches like "LGBTQ" & "race.")
Enjoying the solo-travel no-kids-to-wrangle spa vibes at DFW airport and feeling a little thread-y, so here goes some thinking...
I've been thinking about the pattern that's emerged in the most recent chapter of conservatives' relentless efforts to undermine public schools. The pattern is painfully clear, but it doesn't make headlines. We need it to make headlines.
Some of the positions conservatives have latched onto:
1. Demand in-person schooling. 2. Oppose pub health measures to make in-person schooling safer (masks, vax). 3. Oppose anything related to diversity & inclusion 4. Oppose teaching of honest & complete history (anti-CRT).
Yes. The term “Porn” has been tactically stripped of meaning to facilitate its weaponization against non-dominant groups. Obvious in which books w sexual content are targeted. We can make the critical distinction. Porn as “sexual explicit content for the purposes of arousal”.
Books like GENDER QUEER or OUT OF DARKNESS include sex for other reasons, such as showing the pain of navigating sexuality from a marginalized identity, illustrating that survivors of sexual abuse can reclaim joy in their bodies, and illustrating what consent (and its absence).
And context matters. Porn literally has no context beyond arousal—titillation is the goal start to finish. Sex, when it appears in lit, is an element in a complex whole that must be examined as such, not condemned bc of passages or screenshots out of context.