Shreyas Doshi Profile picture
Dec 17, 2021 30 tweets 8 min read Read on X
As they grow in size, teams within megacorps and startups tend to implicitly bias more towards Project Thinking and not enough Product Thinking.

Product Thinking is a mindset and a process that, once you see, you cannot unsee it.

Product Thinking, Project Thinking, a thread: Image
From my experience working in individual contributor & leadership roles over the past couple of decades, and from my advising work with a number of fast-growth startups, I have often seen myself and founders / CEOs / execs worry about these things: Image
And, having been in the trenches of product work for a large part of my career, and having managed / mentored / coached hundreds of PMs & PM Managers, I have often seen myself, and other ICs & managers worry about these things: Image
How is it that we all say we want the same thing i.e. to create tremendous value for our customers, to grow the company’s business and its positive impact, and yet we end up with such conflicting versions of “truth” in the throes of the inherent complexity of our work?
At least part of the answer lies in the observation that we are often speaking to each other in different languages, but are unaware of it. We litigate the minutiae of a decision, without recognizing that one of us is engaged in Product thinking & the other in Project thinking. Image
What is Product thinking & Project thinking?

Let’s dive deeper into that, because we cannot make much progress without first understanding these things.

And there’s no better way to start our journey than via a couple of example scenarios we see at work.

(based on real events)
Here, you have Alice (former PM, now General Manager) and Bob (PM, reports to Alice) discussing an escalation to the company’s CEO for 2 urgent feature requests.

Notice Bob’s response here.

It is a fairly common response in such situations & it is classic Project Thinking. Image
Let’s take another scenario.

Here, you have Dan (PM) at a product review meeting with Eve (CEO).

Notice how Eve asks a question that’s focused on the customer experience, and how Dan’s response is about resources, launch scope, SLAs.

Classic Project Thinking again. Image
Having seen some examples of Project Thinking, let’s explore more formally how Project Thinking & Product Thinking differ.

And there’s no better place to start here than to look at the types of questions that interest us when we are doing Project Thinking vs. Product Thinking.
Notice how “When” and “Who” are top of mind during Project Thinking, whereas “Why” and “What” are top of mind during Product Thinking. In both modes of thinking, we ask “What else” and “How”, but the actual questions asked differ depending on which mode we are in. Image
The difference in what these questions are seeking (and what answers they will elicit) is really the essence of the difference between the Project Thinking mode and the Product Thinking mode: Image
With this foundation, we are now ready to more formally define Product Thinking and Project Thinking.
Project Thinking:

Project Thinking is about understanding expectations, formulating plans, marshaling resources, and coordinating actions to meet those expectations.
Product Thinking:

Product Thinking is about understanding motivations, conceiving solutions, simulating their effects, and picking a path based on the effects you want to create.
Let’s now look at the two scenarios we saw earlier, and see how those conversations might go if the PM had applied more Product Thinking instead of solely applying Project Thinking.

As a reminder, this is what these scenarios looked like with Project Thinking:
Image
Image
Here, when PM Dave is applying Product Thinking, the response to Alice’s question is a lot more nuanced. It turns out that one of the feature requests is actually quite strategically aligned and Dave recommends just building it. For the other request, Dave recommends a workaround Image
Not just that.

Whereas Project Thinker Bob saw this situation as a crisis, Product Thinker Dave has turned this crisis into an opportunity. He can see how valuable it will be for his company if Customer X can be a key “lighthouse customer” for the new Audit Logging feature.
Let’s now look at the second scenario. Here, Product Thinker Pat knows that a 2 day response time would be less than ideal and they had proactively identified a creative solution to reduce the response time to <10 minutes for a subset of these VIP customers. Image
By using the Product Thinking mode in this situation, Pat is able to see beyond the immediate resourcing constraints that the Support team faces, and presents much clearer trade-offs to CEO Eve: “We can create a better experience with creativity, and such-and-such investment.”
There is indeed a pretty wide contrast between the conversations (and often outcomes) when we are in Project Thinking mode vs. when we are in Product Thinking mode.

Here’s a cheat sheet that can help us better understand how these modes differ and in what ways they are valuable: Image
Before you proceed, I would encourage you to review that cheat sheet one more time, and evaluate how these distinctions might apply to your work, and, if you lead a team or a company, to the work that your team does.
You are probably now asking: how can I apply Project Thinking and Product Thinking in my work?

For any non-trivial project, the right answer isn’t this: Image
Nor is it this: Image
Nor this: Image
The right answer for any sufficiently complex product endeavor is usually this. Time & time again, I've found it useful to start with the Product Thinking hat, arrive at a differentiated, creative solution, assess its feasibility with my Project Thinking hat & iterate a few times Image
At the end of this process, you will have much greater clarity on the ultimate solution & the steps you need to take towards making this ultimate solution a reality, taking into account the constraints you face today & ones you might face tomorrow.

That enables decisive action.
Before we proceed, I want to reemphasize one thing: Product Thinking is not better than Project Thinking. For a team to succeed consistently, it needs to be able to do both Product Thinking & Project Thinking very well. Some of us will be better at one than the other. That’s okay
Because in reality, you can learn Product Thinking, and you can also teach your team the discipline of Product Thinking. To succeed, we need not all be world class Product Thinkers. But it helps if people can recognize these two modes, so they can communicate & decide better.
This thread is getting long, so I will now leave you with a primer to improve your own Product Thinking and team others about it.
Having known and talked to many capable Product Thinkers over the years, here’s how Product Thinking breaks down:

1. Suspend the Project Thinking mindset
2. Prioritize your real goals
3. Understand your users' needs
4. Generate options
5. Simulate Image

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Shreyas Doshi

Shreyas Doshi Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @shreyas

Sep 3
Founder Mode, done right (thread): Image
Some ppl are surprised by the exuberance with which PG’s Founder Mode blog post has been received. There are many reasons for its strong resonance.

But the main one is that it introduces a catchy term for something that many founders & leaders have seen & experienced first-hand.
Here’s my prediction: a majority of founders & leaders who said to themselves this weekend “henceforth I am going to be in Founder Mode” are likely to mess it up.

That is not bad per se. They might still end up being in a better place than if they continued with Manager Mode.
Read 45 tweets
Jun 27
Since time immemorial, when a CEO asks a PM at Product Review, “what do you need to 10X users/revenue?”, “what will make you go faster?”, etc

The PM steadfastly responds “We need [N] more engineers”. The Eng Mgr nods approvingly

A story thread, with some hard truths to swallow:


Image
Image
Image
Image
“More engineers” will usually *not* solve your problems.

Because the real problem is often a strategy problem, culture problem, interpersonal problem, trust problem, creativity problem, or market problem.

More engineers *will* solve your “I don’t have enough engineers” problem. Image
When you finally manage to get more eng headcount, things will usually get worse before they get better.

Management will now expect your team’s immediate output to be in proportion with this new headcount, not with your current staffing.

Not fair, but such is life in product 🤷🏽‍♂️Image
Read 23 tweets
Mar 30, 2023
Product life in midsized & large companies starts making a lot more sense when you understand that a large % of middle & upper management thinks their main job is to (i) try & decipher what the CEO wants done (ii) align their org with it (iii) propose a plan that the CEO approves
This is instead of *often* telling the CEO what actually needs to be done, in a way that is grounded in (a) deep insight into customers & market (b) creative product & GTM solutions

Many in middle & upper management will of course blame incentives set by the company for this.
And they are not wrong. But it is worth evaluating how much of one’s career (and life) one wants to spend in aligning perfectly with incentives set by another party.

20% or 50% or 70% or 90% or 99% or 100%?

What is your answer?
Read 6 tweets
Mar 7, 2023
Those who don’t understand the great value of instinct call it luck.
Read 4 tweets
Mar 3, 2023
Everything we create, everything we do, it all starts with our thinking

Clear thinking drastically improves odds of success in all departments of career & life

While clear thinking is quite rare, it can be developed with practice

Advanced principles for clear thinking:

(1/12)
1) Essence first. Not story. Not analogy

Most people get seduced by great analogies & exciting stories.

Clear thinkers don’t *form* their thinking via analogies. They identify the essence of the issue, in their specific context. Then, they use analogies as one of their inputs.
2) WAYRTTD

“What Are You _Really_ Trying To Do” is a simple but powerful tool to make you pause & identify your real goal

Most people move too quickly to How & When to do a given task. But the task isn’t the goal

Clear thinkers have built a habit of asking themselves WAYRTTD.
Read 19 tweets
Feb 23, 2023
Apple Pie Position:
A statement that instantly elevates the person who is saying it and is simultaneously hard for anyone else to push back on, and so everyone avoids the personal risk and just nods “yes”, even though its actual value in this specific situation might be… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
Okay, so now that you understand Apple Pie, here’s your crash course on dealing with Apple Pie:

1) The greatest thing about Apple Pie Positions is that you now have a name to assign to a complex behavior (and it is a cute name, which helps a lot). Once you share this idea with… twitter.com/i/web/status/1…
One other important thing:

Note that Apple Pie Positions are, by definition, specific to the context. This means that the same sentence can be either the right thing to focus on, or it can be an Apple Pie Position. The way you determine which is which is through good judgment.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Don't want to be a Premium member but still want to support us?

Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us!

:(