Share this page!

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
Twitter logo
17 Dec, 10 tweets, 3 min read
1/
 lol
2/
 Be pseudonymous online. Establish and use a long-running identity that is worth maintaining. Exchange it every couple years. Have side identities for when necessary.

Some of those could well be *shared* with others allied with you. 4chan's "Anonymous" identity comes to mind.
3/
 There's some golden replies to the op
4/
 Some people *get* the old wisdom of "don't feed the trolls".

Others want to hold fellow anons "accountable" for how they feel.
5/
 yes
6/
 oh boi
7/
 yes
8/
 yes to this brief thread
9/
 stay anonymous and stay safe, frens

10/
 yes

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with mark doppelgänger 🛰

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @DoppelMark

mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
19 Dec
1/
 When a problem reoccurs several times in short time, you have a process problem. If the organization is sizable, it needs an external consultant to channel the already-existing knowledge through decisionmakers to execution.
2/
 "but the consultants are expensive"
Consultants provide service that is nigh impossible to keep & foster in-house:
they enable the middle managers to make an about-face without losing face.

Moreover, the *strength* of their influence is proportional to the budget.
3/
 The consultants find & extract knowledge and ability to fix that is already present in the organization, and then re-frame it from "a hare-brained and expensive idea" to "everybody does it as the best practice".
Read 8 tweets
mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
18 Dec
1/
 Important thought, and needs to be discussed to effect.

I'll add my three points below.
2/
 The first point - a necessary technological development:
at present *propaganda/marketing/PR* is much more cost-effective than engineering, manufacture. This makes propaganda pervasive and highly influential on the society, making people & businesses highly subject to it.
3/
 A sub-point regarding propaganda/marketing/PR:
need a cultural trend that treats negative propaganda at significant scale like a social attack, and reacts accordingly. At present pushback to it is strongly disallowed.
Read 10 tweets
mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
16 Dec
1/
 interesting thread.
2/
 a point to expand upon: one's individual data is probably not that very valuable; it's much more valuable *in aggregate* and *with cross-correlation *. it would probably make much more sense for group ownership of data - think shareholders in a business venture.
3/
 another point to expand upon: ability to trade our own data would *also* provide us with a degree of feedback as to how (non-)anonymous does our data make us.

imagine if, for every draft post, you could get an estimate "this de-anonymizes you by 2%" or some such.
Read 9 tweets
mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
1 Dec
1/
 The "no politics" rule of polite conversations has proven destructive. Question the "no politics" rule. Question the origin of the "no politics" rule.
2/
 "No politics" - for sake of unity - has proven to be head-in-sand. Unity is a compromise negotiated from positions of strength and understanding, not an abrogation of your position. Where there is subversion of the negotiated compromise, there there is no unity.
3/
 The left subverted the "no politics" rule of polite conversation by re-defining its political demands ("X rights", "free/costless Y", "equality of Z" etc.) as "common sense", "modern", "humanitarian", and - "non-political".
Read 5 tweets
mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
30 Nov
they'll either give a carve-out for journalists, or they fall by the wayside.

i wonder whether the new CEO wanted some quick publicity from controversy - or is really that inexperienced.
perhaps that's the point: to put Twitter in position of deeming who is a journalist (corporate media?) and who "isn't" (Andy Ngo?)
Twitter and "private media" poasting ban: they codified a carve-out for "covered by mainstream media". This might be aimed at smaller journalists like Andy Ngo. Or memes.

A lot will hinge on how they will interpret they other marked point, "contains eyewitness account...".
Read 4 tweets
mark doppelgänger 🛰 Profile picture
26 Nov
>credibility liquidity

Claire Lehmann and her crew are engaging in very interesting strategy:
staying correct on secondary concerns - and also turning that into supporting the official line of their government's primary concerns du jour.
>corrective information
>we're just protecting the indigenous communities
This is particularly interesting, coming from a portugal politician.

He says flat out" fake news" because the name is not an exact translation according to him - and because the measures enacted are "sensible". Replies lists what was enacted - exactly what you expect.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @DoppelMark has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @DoppelMark!

Read all threads by @DoppelMark

:(