Watching the Turkish Lira’s collapse today, the thought that keeps popping in my head is “live by financial markets, die by financial markets.” +
For years, Erdogan was given a very long leash by financial markets, as his unsustainable macro policies were supported by external inflows, attracted by the short-term yield gap. +
One of the myths of financial globalization is that it enforces macro discipline. In Turkey, it was the opposite. Turkey’s economic experiment ran much longer than it should have thanks to the more elastic supply of finance. The economic costs will be larger as a result. +
With the pandemic and drying up of emerging market finance, Turkey already had to engineer a sharp turnaround on the current account. Now domestic savers have had enough too. +
And with monetary tightening looming in the US, it will be difficult for Erdogan to stabilize the Lira yet again. Live by financial markets, die by financial markets. END

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Dani Rodrik

Dani Rodrik Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @rodrikdani

25 Oct
From a new paper (with Jacob Greenspon): the global distribution of authorship of top-10 economics journal authorship versus economic size
Authors based in developing countries have made little gains over time, and where they have, it is limited to the lowest-ranked journals.
These are based on data in Fontana et al. (2019). We thank Fabio Montobbio for making the to data available. We will put out the full paper soon.
Read 4 tweets
22 Oct
Re utility of classics in Economics, I’d like to take a position that I think is intermediate between @BrankoMilan and @florianederer. There's a sense in which Economics is like the natural sciences, with cumulative progress and you only need to read the latest articulation. +
So to understand comparative advantage, or efficiency of markets or a particular mode of oligopoly you do not need to read Ricardo, Smith, or Cournot. Contemporary textbooks are much better at explaining the theory, clarifying where it applies, and presenting relevant evidence. +
But there is also a sense in which Economics is not like the natural sciences. Economics advances not by simply refining existing models (vertically), but by expanding the range of models and enlarging the library of explanations (horizontally). +
Read 6 tweets
10 Jul 20
A word about manufacturing, prompted by Biden’s “buy American” proposals. It is important to distinguish between production and employment. +
Manufacturing production exerts outsized influence on a nation’s innovative capacity and productivity. It is important to have sensible industrial policies that promote it. And it’s possible to reinvigorate manuf in the sense of preventing a decline in MVA/GDP. +
Employment is another matter. Labor content of manufacturing has been in decline for a very long time (flip side of rising productivity) and I think it’s virtually impossible to reverse employment-deindustrialization. No nation has managed to do it. +
Read 6 tweets
13 Jun 20
There’s been much discussion in recent days about Economics’ race problem. Some of what has come out is quite disturbing. I have not said much, but I have listened and thought. Here are a few reflections I want to add. +
It doesn’t surprise me that the field, as a whole, reflects the ingrained attitudes and practices of the society of which it is part. But there are some features of the discipline that magnify and aggravate the problem. +
First, Economics is clubby. While good research does get recognized, the ability to produce it depends on networks. If you don’t start with the networks in place–a PhD from a top dept, a well-recognized advisor--you start with a significant handicap difficult to overcome.
Read 7 tweets
3 Mar 20
Short thread on technology and skills: I am struck by how much we focus on education/training (to match the demands of innovation) and how little we think about redirecting innovation (to match the skills of the current and prospective labor force). +
Technological determinism runs deep. We tend to think we have little control over innovation and that society must somehow adjust to its consequences. Yet who innovates, who benefits from innovation, whom it replaces, and how it is deployed are all the result of choices we make +
We can innovate to replace labor with machine. Or we can innovate specifically with an eye towards increasing the tasks that ordinary workers can perform – by doing work that was previously performed by more skilled people, or by providing more specialized, customized services. +
Read 4 tweets
1 Feb 20
I’m starting to think the idea that Trump captured the Republican Party has it exactly backward. It’s the party that’s captured Trump, making him pursue all its favorite policies (taxes, judges, deregulation), just with a modicum of space for Trumpian idiosyncrasy on trade.
Moreover, Trump has the great virtue from the standpoint of the R party that he can increase support for it among the less well off whites by playing the racism and nativism card. Otherwise, plutocratic policies would have dwindling electoral support.
Which, by the way, is why I am unconvinced by @ezraklein’s argument (in his new book) downplaying material conditions (inequality and economic insecurity) as a strong factor behind “polarized identity.”
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(