NEW: Using a massive database compiled on the Wagner Group by former Ukrainian intelligence officers, we found and interviewed half a dozen families who have lost sons, husbands or brothers in Vladimir Putin's mercenary army. A four-month investigation: newlinesmag.com/reportage/the-…
The story behind the story: In September, I traveled to Kyiv to do some reporting for my forthcoming GRU book. I was introduced to Gen. Ihor Guskov, a former counterintelligence officer at the SBU, Ukraine's domestic security service.
Guskov has spent the last seven years tracking every known Wagner fighter around the world.
With his onetime boss, Vasyl Hrytsak, Guskov now runs the Ukrainian Center of Analytics and Security, a think tank, that continues the work they started at the SBU.
Their database includes more than 4,000 Wagner fighters. Guskov gave me the whole thing.
Each entry includes a full name, date of birth, callsign, and a ton of photographs mined from social media for every documented fighter. In many cases, Guskov also found last known home addresses for the mercenaries.
Using the latter information, @newlinesmag and its partners @DelfiEE and @dagensnyheter tracked down family members of fallen fighters. All had similar stories to tell about how their relatives were recruited and died on foreign battlefields under the veil of secrecy.
E.g. "Mark didn’t have any military experience that his mother is aware of. Natalya tried to persuade him not to go, but he insisted. 'I said I was against it, but he just said, "Mom, I love you." And that was it,' Natalya says."
"Just a little over a month later Mark was killed. 'He was just cannon fodder,' Natalya says."
Most of the Wagner fighters we profiled are buried in a cemetery in Rostov. Their families have been told not to ask questions or seek any kind of restitution if they ever intend to cross into Russia to visit the gravesites. Some aren't even convinced their loved one is gone.
“How do I know that my brother is dead? I have no death certificate or anything,” asks Oleg, the brother of Aleksandr Motinga, who joined Wagner and is believed to have died in Syria in 2017.
It was virtually the same story everywhere we went: poor young men with little to no schooling, often from broken or violent homes, lured by ambiguous online adverts with promises of foreign adventure and small fortunes.
One mercenary, Vladislav Apostol, was from a little-populated village near Chișinau. He became notorious after a video surfaced in 2017 showing Apostol and four other Wagner fighters torturing and mutilating Hamadi Bouta, a deserter from the Syrian army.
They bludgeoned, dismembered and immolated Bouta -- on camera. Then they took selfies.
Apostol wielded a sledgehammer.
In the EU's sanctions package announced this week, that gruesome snuff film was cited as one of the many war crimes Wagner is guilty of.
Dmitry Utkin, the former GRU officer who commands the group, is accused of having ordered this atrocity as well as the filming of it.
Apostol was killed in that famous firefight with US-backed forces (and US aircraft) near the Conoco gas plant in eastern Syria in March 2018.
Using Gen. Guskov's dataset, we were also able to conduct a demographic analysis of the Wagner Group.
"Among the 4,184 individuals in the database, fighters have come from 15 different countries, and some have multiple citizenships. The majority, 2,708, unsurprisingly hail from Russia, 222 from Ukraine, 17 from Belarus, 11 from Kazakhstan, nine from Moldova, eight from Serbia..."
"four from Armenia, four from Uzbekistan, three from Bosnia and Herzegovina, two from Kyrgyzstan, two from Tajikistan, two from Syria, two from Turkmenistan and one from Georgia." Some have dual or multiple citizenships.
With respect to fatalities, we found that of "the 372 confirmed dead, 75 are known to have died from 2014 to 2016, 186 in 2017 and 86 in 2018."
According to Hrytsak, the former SBU chief, it is nonsensical to describe Wagner as a "private military company." It is, he says, "Russian military intelligence" and it poses a serious danger not only to Ukraine and the MENA region, but globally.
“If they need to recruit 100 people tomorrow to do something illegal in Europe, these people will fly in dressed in civilian clothes...They will assemble, put on uniforms and take up arms. One small group can very quickly destabilize the situation in any country."
Today's front-page story in @dagensnyheter: "The mercenaries are fighting in Putin's secret army."
And @DelfiEE's ad for the investigation, broadcast in snowy Tallinn:
NEW: A Syrian army deserter was savagely beaten to death and mutilated on camera by soldiers of the notorious Wagner Group in eastern Syria in 2017. Now his family wants justice. Report by @newlinesmag and Sweden’s @dagensnyheternewlinesmag.com/reportage/fami…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Suggest European friends and allies read not only the National Security Strategy but also the National Defense Authorization Act for FY 2026, which was published last night. It's very long, so skip to this section: rules.house.gov/sites/evo-subs…
Here, for instance, we see several amendments written in direct response to what Elbridge Colby has been doing at DoD while Pete Hegseth does chin-ups and tequila shots. Note the provision about reclassifying aid to Ukraine as needed U.S. stocks -- this cannot be done, per this draft, unless the kit is so badly needed for a contingency op, its absence could result in mission failure or loss of American lives:
Let's say Trump wants to punish Zelensky again for not wanting to forfeit Donbas by cutting intel sharing to Ukraine. He would have two days to notify Congress on this decision. And he'd have to explain why he did it and what the anticipated consequences to Ukraine would be. "Because I'm an asshole and I don't care" might not even suffice in this fast-changing political environment!
U.S. officials now confirmed what I wrote yesterday -- this whole thing was a Russian active measure, leaked to the press to sow panic and confusion and be conflated with U.S. policy in an administration where incompetence and dysfunction are evidently features, not bugs. macspaunday.substack.com/p/he-got-this-…
Utter fucking embarrassment for the United States, and it certainly explains the muted/cautious response by the Kremlin. I do hope Europe is paying close attention. *This* is the government they think they need to kowtow to.
Question now is who was pushing this "Russian wish-list" as a do-or-die plan of action to the Ukrainians from the American side? I think we know the answer. And why is the admin suddenly backing away from this thing?
New: I acquired the private memoir of Gen. Alexander Zorin, a senior GRU officer who was Putin's envoy to Syria and is now leading POW exchanges with Ukraine. A feature film, "Porcelain Soldier," is set to debut in Russia next month, all about Zorin's adventures -- sort of a Stierlitz meets Bourne production, which was green-lit by former Russian Defense Minister Sergei Shoigu. newlinesmag.com/reportage/the-…
In all, I've acquired over a thousand pages of documents: Zorin's 186-page memoir, which he titled "The Negotiator" (watch your back, Sam Jackson), some of the ancillary production material for the movie, and five iterations of the screenplay, each more cartoonish in plot and dialogue than the last. The first draft is actually rather nuanced and ends with Zorin weeping upon learning a rebel commander he persuaded to evacuate was subsequently killed by the Russian army after Zorin gave his word that would not happen. (Who says the GRU is a heartless organization?)
The memoir is a fascinating portrait of the life of a still-active Russian spy, made more fascinating because in his pursuit of self-aggrandizement Zorin inadvertently reveals things his masters in Moscow might not like. These include the sorry state of the Russian Air Force in Syria (as in Ukraine, jet pilots used store-bought Garmin GPS devices to navigate, causing near-miss mid-air collisions and much else). The shoot-first-ask-questions-never disposition of racist Russian military commanders. And the Mad Hatter illogic of Russian disinformation schemes about Syrian chemical weapons attacks.
Re: Trump's denial of the WSJ story, read this paragraph twice. Transferring authorization from Hegseth to Grynkewich is almost the scoop itself. Cuts Elbridge Colby out of the process, and one wonders how and why this decision was taken -- note, taken before the Ze visit to the WH -- given all Cheese's unflattering press. Trump recently called him "J.D.'s guy." (Second screenshot from prior WSJ piece on Colby pausing deep strike authorization under this review process.) wsj.com/politics/natio…
Not the first time Grynkewich v. Colby has popped up. When PURL was announced, Grynkewich was the guy named running point with DoD (logical enough given he's SACEUR). This was around the time of the Colby memo diverting USAI kit meant for Ukraine back into U.S. stockpiles. cnn.com/2025/08/08/pol…
Which led to articles such as this one in The Hill:
“The unannounced U.S. move to enable Kyiv to use the missile in Russia comes after authority for supporting such attacks was recently transferred from Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth at the Pentagon to the top U.S. general in Europe, Gen. Alexus Grynkewich, who also serves as NATO commander.”
Steve Witkoff's Public Financial Disclosure form, which he filed late, is unsigned by any ethics official. It also falsely states Witkoff held no federal position before June of this year. He did not divest from relevant assets before he started his diplomatic job, as he was supposed to. And note the company at the heart of the big @nytimes investigation into his questionable business dealings with the Emiratis concerning World Liberty Financial, "a cryptocurrency start-up founded by the Witkoffs and Trumps." On page 23 of Witkoff's disclosure, World Liberty Financial is given with no value listed. nytimes.com/2025/09/15/us/…
Why is this document unsigned or certified by any government ethics official? Does this mean that no one has actually conducted the conflict of interest assessment and associated divestitures normally required before an official can start the job?
Why does it only cover the period from 6/30 through now? Where is the disclosure for January through the end of June?