So I had a big story go up at The Intercept over the weekend. About 18 months of reporting.

Because it's quite long, here's a thread that I hope will persuade you to read it.

theintercept.com/2021/12/18/lit…
It opens with a black woman sergeant at the Little Rock PD receiving an odd text message from her white assistant chief.

The message, sent to her and 4 white women, asked the recipients to make sexual harassment complaints against the city's black, reformist chief.
The problem is that this sergeant had no such accusations to make. And when she pointed this out, she was pressured to file a complaint, anyway. She saw this as an attempt to bring down the chief because of his reforms.
She saw the texts -- which had been sent in the middle of the night -- just minutes after seeing the George Floyd video for the first time.
Over the ensuing months, the chief's critics made more accusations, including that he had sexually harassed at least 12 women, that he was having other affairs, including one with a woman for whom he tried to secure a high-paying job at the department.
18 months later, none of these accusations have panned out.

Critics have also publicized the chief's personal finances and fed the local news false stories about him.

He's been regularly attacked on pro-police sites like LawOfficer.com.
For example, one lawsuit claims that when a female officer reported a hostile work environment, the chief disregarded her and transferred her. But I spoke to the woman. She adamantly denied the lawsuit's claims. She said the chief is actually the only one who took her seriously.
In fact, she said the assistant chief -- the one who filed the lawsuit and who sent those text messages -- is actually the one who disregarded her complaint.

The fact that the assistant chief's lawyer then included the incident in her lawsuit is pretty brazen. It's also . . .
. . . a good sign that these lawsuits were not intended to prevail in court, but to generate public pressure to force the reformist chief out of office.
The entire campaign against the chief, driven by rivals for his job and the police union, is similar to one 20 years ago against the city's first black chief. He too was accused of sexual transgressions with a white woman, "reverse discrimination," and misappropriating funds.
Those allegations too never panned out.

These campaigns demonstrate how difficult it is to implement reform in cities with entrenched interests and powerful police unions, and how those interests preserve structural racism in police departments.
Black cops told me that those who speak out about racial profiling, abuse of force, and other misconduct are targeted by the FOP (which is why there's a black officers' union.) Meanwhile, if a new chief tries to change a system that protects white officers, the union helps ...
... white officers bring complaints of "reverse discrimination."

The story also includes one of the more poignant interviews I've ever conducted with a source. Troy Ellison is a black major at LRPD. In 2010, his father was killed in his home by two white officers. Ellison's...
... father was not suspected of any crime. The officers came into his apartment uninvited. When he told them to "get the f**k out," they confronted him, fought with him, and ultimately killed him.

The husband of the officer who shot him was in charge of the investigation.
Black officers say that investigation was also loaded with conflicts of interest, violations of procedure, and other signs of a cover-up.

Ellison and his family sued, which led to some pretty humiliating retaliation, including one incident in which he was forced to attend ...
... a use of force class with the officers who killed his father. The class was taught by the attorney defending those officers while representing the city in the lawsuit.
Today, Ellison is in charge of the riot team that shows up at protests. He talked to me about the internal conflict that roils inside him at those protests. He said he often feels he has one foot on both sides of the protest line.
There's a lot more.

But if all of this hasn't persuaded you, you might just read the story for the anecdote about how former Arkansas Gov. Mike Huckabee and his wife Janet often went jet skiing with the city's SWAT team.

(Really!)

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
 

Keep Current with Radley Balko

Radley Balko Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @radleybalko

30 Nov
Here's a 🧵 about consumer fraud:

Last June I bought some concert tickets. I thought I was buying them from the venue itself, but I apparently mistakenly bought them through a third-party vendor called BoxOfficeTicketSales.com.
I was surprised to learn after buying my tickets that they wouldn't be delivered until a few days before the show, which was in September. It's possible this was mentioned somewhere in the fine print, but if it was, it certainly wasn't conspicuous.
I wouldn't have bought the tickets if I had known, b/c it would be difficult to re-sell them if we had a conflict. (These were e-tix, so it's not clear why they couldn't deliver sooner.)

The show was in September, and as the date approached, we did indeed end up with a conflict.
Read 14 tweets
29 Nov
When you point out that reported shoplifting in SF is actually down, the response is that that retailers have stopped reporting it because they know the perpetrators will never be prosecuted. The latter part isn't true, and the former is basically unfalsifiable.

But . . .
. . . I'm curious -- *is* there any evidence for it? Have any retailers explicitly told employees to stop reporting shoplifting to police?

I know Walgreens instructed security guards to stop *apprehending* suspected shoplifters, for safety and liability reasons.
But that's different than not reporting. Especially if there's surveillance video.

My hunch is that even if there's a sense that reporting would be futile, there are still mundane reasons for doing so (inventory, insurance, accounting, etc.).

But I also suspect . . .
Read 5 tweets
11 Nov
Here now, a thread of decrees I would issue if I were made king of the criminal justice system.

Feel free to reply and add your own.
-- If police say an informant is reliable and trustworthy in an affidavit (despite drug use, a criminal record, etc.), the courts will assume that same informant is reliable and trustworthy should he or she later accuse the police of lying or misconduct.
-- All else being equal, jailhouse informants cited by prosecutors to convict someone ("he confessed to me") should be given the same weight as jailhouse informants cited by defense attorneys to exonerate someone ("the real killer confessed to me")
Read 11 tweets
10 Nov
House is currently surrounded by Nashville police. They keep announcing they have a K-9 and to "come out with your hands up, and you won't be bitten." But it's not at all clear who they're talking to.

(I'm fairly sure it isn't me.)
Now helicopters swirling overhead. Weird thing is, they didn't close the roads. So when I step out on the porch people keep driving by the cop cars, then slowing down to ask me what's going on. Pretty surreal.
Let me just add, it isn't *just* our house. But there are cop cars surrounding a group of about 10 or so houses, including ours.
Read 5 tweets
5 Nov
So the anti-car people have just been relentless in my mentions over the last 24 hours.

The odd thing is, I actually *agree* that we are a far too car-dependent country. I think Robert Moses is one of the great under-recognized villains of the 20th Century.

But …
… it’s precisely *because* we’re so car dependent that I’m wary of mass automated enforcement that would catch every violation every time. We have …

— cities that now rely on revenue from violations, meaning they need people to *keep* committing infractions to balance budgets
— roads often designed for speeds far higher than posted speed limits, essentially tempting drivers to break the law
— laws that impose DL suspensions and issue arrest warrants for people unable to pay fines
— numerous cities caught manipulating stoplights and shortening …
Read 10 tweets
1 Nov
So I guess I need to do some record-correcting.

In this Manhattan Institute piece, @RAVerBruggen says I tweeted, “murders are surging because an
entire profession would rather let people die than hold their colleagues accountable . . .

media4.manhattan-institute.org/sites/default/…
. . . when they needlessly hurt and kill people."

This is true! However, I was summarizing this article, which claimed cops have been quitting and de-policing because of the Chauvin fallout. That article was published by . . . the Manhattan Institute!

city-journal.org/why-cops-are-q…
I actually *don't* think de-policing caused the murder surge.

(To be fair, I mistakenly failed to thread the quoted tweet to my previous tweet, which linked to the article. So it's entirely understandable why VerBruggen would mistakenly assume I was expressing my own opinion.)
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!


This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

:(