2/Bear in mind that our work considered Housing First with “eyes open” as I had raised relevant questions as to what it can deliver, most especially where addiction is part of the picture pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/19523126/
3/However, on whole and despite the very real challenges that will happen when housing people with serious mental illness and addiction challenge, the data have been reassuring as to potential for success, like this pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/21285095/
4/The actual work by case management staff to get a person into a unit is serious, demanding, and logistically hard because of the rental market and bureaucracy ps.psychiatryonline.org/doi/full/10.11…
5/We interviewed ~ 170 VA personnel in 8 VA med centers to assess fidelity to the Housing First model 2012-14: high fidelity for emphasis on permanent housing without precondition, less so for harm reduction, middling for strength of supportive services - pubmed.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/28481597/
6/Like any and every complex organizational undertaking, Housing First can be done well or less so. We found the best fidelity to Housing First when the leadership, middle management and the VA medical center as a whole aligned efforts: link.springer.com/article/10.100…
7/I have seen egregious attempts to argue that the approach used by VA actually did not work.
Please look at the graph.
Any large piece of work can be done well or poorly. That is why we take it seriously.
But don’t ignore results! /fin
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
🧵1/Our @uabmedicine Grand Rounds will feature a diagnostic showdown between Dr Martin Rodriguez and ChatGPT4
I am scared here because I don’t want AI to win
2/the case features behavioral changes, swearing, cognitive decline, cough, progressive weakness over 3 years.
I wonder about infectious and rheumatic disorders. Maybe primary neurological
Aspirations after a cognitive change is possible
Dr Rodriguez opens. Not much to go on.
3/ChatGPT generated a lot of text read by Dr Kraemer but it is pretty good, with emphasis on neurological disorders followed by a disclaimer “please note that this does not substitute for professional medical advice”. Both want more information
Truth💣 1/ The “NARXCare” opioid Rx risk algorithm is in all Prescription Monitoring Databases,ie ~1 bn Rx’s/year
NOW in @JournalGIM
✅evidence does not yet exist to support it as safe or protective
✅It has flourished due to lack of federal oversight link.springer.com/article/10.100…
2/The authors, led by Dr Michele Buonara, review the core argument as one in which this algorithm with low evidence to its favor
and high risk of harm
has gone unregulated
despite apparently fulfilling @US_FDA criteria that mandate it be regulated
3/Nearly all prescribers and national pharmacies now see the Bamboo Health, Inc proprietary “NARXcare” algorithm in a more prominent position *than the prescription history itself” when they view a prescription history.
1/Arguing for methadone deregulation, Dr. Ruth Potee notes that in an auditorium of 400 addiction specialists, almost NONE prescribe methadone (because they can't)
"Methadone is a miracle drug that no one has access to"
There are more people who offer Botox than offer methadone
Patient: “I can still do my activities”.
Doc: "No way, not really. I read the SPACE trial, and there is NO benefit (that would outweigh the opioids’ risk)”
"Shared decision-making" seems *doomed* here
1/I watch with concern as DEA prosecutions of MDs still seem to rely on “they prescribed more than I would” despite a 9-0 ruling of
Supreme Court last year
Sudden termination of opioids & progressive abandonment of 5-8 million patients is dangerous
1/Even on inpatient rounds, it is possible to introduce the idea that addiction isn’t (only) in the brain.
I contrast @NIAAAnews “brain disease” against a behavioral economics vide substance use as a pattern of behavior occurring in relation to environmental context
2/On teaching rounds we read aloud and discussed the @NIAAAnews brain-science model of addiction, pulling just a few lines off their website
3/then we read lines from Chapter 39 of “Evaluating the Brain Disease Model of Addiction” - this presents harmful substance use as a pattern of behavior based on assessment of competing rewards, delay or uncertainty of desired rewards, risks and costs - ie behavioral economics