Christmas is coming and many of us are going to get a little bit over indulgent over the next few weeks. So here is a serious thread about licorice which I have been meaning to write. If you eat it regularly, or know older people who indulge in eating it - then please read on...
Earlier this year I discovered by accident that I had dangerously high blood pressure - Systolic blood pressure scores of over 200. I was naturally quite shocked, especially as I felt fine. I was regularly getting scores of about 190/110
After speaking to my GP over the phone and having blood tests, my wife remembered a connection between licorice and blood pressure. After a quick search we found it is truly terrible for your heart and blood pressure, really quite terrible.
I'd been eating about 2 x 200g bags a week as a treat after work and as alternative to chocolate (as many people eat it for that reason). Without much of a search I found several case studies that highlighted how bad it was.
The papers also highlighted that you do not need a lot of it to do the damage, just about 50g per day for two weeks can give you dangerously high blood pressure. In one paper it was 25g per day doing the damage (1/8th of a typical bag)
This paper captured the problem succinctly - "The FDA should start regulating the use of this substance and create public awareness through the media about its health hazards." ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
Of course, we can all talk about 'everything in moderation" But the FDA report that: "If you’re 40 or older, eating 2 ounces of black licorice a day for at least two weeks could land you in the hospital with an irregular heart rhythm or arrhythmia." - A typical bag is about 6-8oz
Here's another one about licorice tea ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P… - "Excessive consumption of liquorice tea can induce hypertension in previously normotensive patients, and present with a clinical picture similar to primary hyperaldosteronism."
According to what you read, 'excessive' might be as low as 10g a day - 1/10th of a typical bag. The thing to look for is whether it contains Glycyrrhizin which is 50 times sweeter than sugar.
So what does licorice do? What did it do to me? It removed potassium in my body that helps regulate my heart and blood pressure. It also made my kidneys retain salt and water. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/P…
I felt fine, but my blood pressure was scarily high for a few weeks and has dropped considerably since to about 120/85 and thereabouts. I started to have muscle weakness and didn't feel that well once I stopped eating it.
My GP and blood nurse were not aware of the connection but it seems prudent to ask any patients who present with high blood pressure about licorice intake, especially when it's a common Xmas gift.
Even my blood nurse commented that her grandmother had a mysteriously high blood pressure and loved licorice - now she knows why. Thanks to my wife, I'd probably keep eating it and increasingly risk of stroke etc
It does have some positive health properties, but in moderation means 'eat very little amounts' if you want to prevent a similar scenario that I and others have had. If you are giving it as a gift to elderly family or friends, think again.
There seems to be an inconsistency on supermarket sites as @Morrisons@sainsburys@Tesco have warnings on licorice tea - but not on sweets. Tesco recommend "For all consumers we recommend not exceeding 1 cup per day." For all...not just elderly etc
When searching for further information and case studies I didn't need to search far to find papers and news reports - even a 2017 Tweet from @trishgreenhalgh about how bad it can be for your health
I do wonder how many GPs and primary care centres know about licorice (given my GP and nurse didn't) given how popular it is (especially with the elderly). In some of the case studies, it was the patient who diagnosed the problem, as did my wife for me.
Obviously, I do worry about the licorice lobby coming after me 😉but this really is a serious point and hopefully it will get through to a few people and prevent them from being rushed to A&E this winter when services are stretched.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
My latest post for @LSEImpactBlog and one of my last here as I will be elsewhere (see bio for links).
If ‘academic X’ is sinking, where are research organisations going?
I have compiled a spreadsheet (that can be updated) includes over 250 of them 1/12
My spreadsheet can be viewed online
It details over 250 research and academic funders, learned societies, charities, open research orgs, publishers etc. All are on @X most on @LinkedInUK and various numbers on @bluesky @joinmastodon and Threads. 2/12bit.ly/4ecQPWo
Those which have sailed across to other platforms (except LinkedIn) the majority are not using them in any meaningful way. Most remain here, posting to smaller audiences within an increasingly toxic ocean of abuse, bots and misinformation. @Jisc & @A_L_T recently departing. 3/12
I asked #ChatGPT 'Can you provide 10 tips as to how an academic could make their research more visible to society?'.
The answer was pretty good and though it lacked nuance I can see it largely checked the boxes (although no mention of podcasts and Mendeley citation).
1. Write for a general audience: Instead of writing research papers filled with technical jargon, try to write articles, blog posts, or op-eds in a language that is easy for the public to understand.
2. Use social media: Use platforms like Twitter, LinkedIn, or Facebook to share your research findings, engage with other researchers and promote your work.
I think the trend is clear that researchers, research teams, organisations, funders et al, see communicating research openly is increasingly important. I'm not entirely sure that ambition is matched with investment. 1/8 blogs.lse.ac.uk/impactofsocial…
There is however, a disparity in that a minority of research does invest in proper research communications. When I say proper communications, I mean going beyond a few Tweets and a press release but actually trying to build campaigns with genuine Open Access artefacts. 2/8
This of course requires labour, skills, technology, investment of time. Some research projects and funders will pay for that, but for the most part that might be a single visual output (video, graphic, animation) created externally. This highlights another problem. 3/8
Just running my latest writing boot camp online and I talked about the idea of flipping your day round. I do this on occasion in the summer and winter months and find it very beneficial. Of course I am very lucky I can do this as many working elsewhere cannot. So what is this?
I like hiking and seeing friends and family when I can, but in the winter months it can be very hard. It is dark before 4pm and finishing work in the dark can feel a bit depressing. So every so often I flip my day to ensure I get some exercise, vitamin D and sometimes see friends
Using annual leave or flexi time, I take the morning off and go walking, either alone or with someone. This usually involves a cafe breakfast. I plan to be home for about 12 and then work with a tea break until about 8-9pm. This leaves me an hour or so for winding down before bed
At times you have to question what qualifications you need to write this kind of headline - 'UK builders go WOKE: Study finds three quarters of tradesmen discuss their feelings with colleagues while two thirds shun the fried breakfasts and nearly half say they are history buffs'
So let me get this right? When suicide is a HUGE problem for men, it is 'Woke' to discuss your feelings. When obesity is a HUGE problem it is a problem to turn down friend breakfasts. Poor, poor spun journalism.
"According to the survey by Toolstation, one builder in ten starts the day with stretches, practising either Pilates or yoga, and a similar number regularly meditate."
Less than 24 hours after buying Twitter, various banned accounts are back on the platform (Tommy Robinson, Britain First with new accounts and Tucker Carlson re-instated). The latter shows that they are back to stay, so it's fair to say that others will be back. 1/5
No doubt many accounts will be back, emboldened and probably looking to stir things up. I'm sure as a result many will consider quitting Twitter or already have. This just gives up the platform to unevidenced voices and those peddling hate. 2/5
I'm sure we've forgotten who was banned in recent years on this platform, but let me refresh your memory with a few on top of those I cited earlier. Alex Jones, David Icke, Donald Trump, Katie Hopkins, Graham Linehan, David Duke, Steve Bannon, the list goes on. 3/5