This is an important chart that I think everyone should know about.
In 2017, BTC topped on Dec 16, but alts still kept going for some time. ETH *doubled* in price between Dec 16 - Jan 13 ($700-$1,400) when BTC was going down. Crypto market cap peaked on Jan 7, not Dec 16.
It took almost a year until the crypto market cap overall deflated as much as bitcoin. Although at that point, the losses per coin were generally much larger than for bitcoin (-80% to -99%).
Lesson: if you're trading alts, you won't necessarily know it's over 'til it's over.
Is it different these days? Maybe. Data suggests it isn't. BTC's 1st top ($64k) happened in April but the overall market kept going until May. ETH once again doubled ($2.2k-$4.4k) in that time.
Just because the "bull market" keeps going while bitcoin is going down, it doesn't necessarily mean that the "flippening" is here, that it's the end of Proof-of-Work or anything like that. There's usually a lag. That is how it usually goes. Don't read too much into it.
The general principle here is that as BTC goes up, an avalanche of profit seekers rush to the exchanges. They buy anything and everything. Often for quite some time after the real music has stopped playing.
Maybe it will really be different this time. You should just keep in mind that this has been the rule so far, and not read too much into it if the market behaves that way again.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
I don’t know who needs to hear this but something having a lower gas cost does not immediately mean that once that thing gets adopted, transaction fees will be lower
Gas cost can go down but gas price can go up
🤷♂️
I think if all Ethereum activity got squished into a single rollup L2, it would probably be a mistake to assume transaction fees would go down. ”Cost” would go down, but fees would probably trend back up again
Only with multiple rollups do you have a very good chance of lowering the fees for the longterm, atleast for certain transactions
This comes from that you segregate the bidding contest for block space into separate mempools essentially.
I own this NFT that gives you a free dinner with the Chief Protocol Architect of $AVAX, @kevinsekniqi.
It's currently on the X-chain. I want to transfer it to the C-chain if there are any good UIs for people to place bids/take offers for NFTs there? Any suggestions?
What's cool about this NFT is that you don't need to buy it just because you want to eat dinner with @kevinsekniqi. You can buy it because you expect the demand (and therefore the value) of a dinner with @kevinsekniqi will be higher in the future. It's basically a social token!
Side-question: Am I personally turning this NFT into a security right now by giving you an expectation of profit? @kevinsekniqi issued it and transferred it for free and didn't create any expectations when he issued it. But am I myself committing a crime by marketing it as such?
Technically it’s not built yet and it’s a USD-denominated bond (not a bitcoin-denominated bond) but the loan is used to buy bitcoin and invest in/fund Bitcoin City
I don’t know what I think about the whole authoritarianish gov building a honey pot of crypto wealthy in a country with one of the highest murder rates on the planet but I do love volcanoes and volcano-powered cities & the Sovereign Individual touch where govs compete for people
ETH is priced as if it can flip BTC (% of BTC mcap)
ETH-killers are priced as if they can flip ETH (% of ETH mcap)
Even though they aren’t optimized as monetary assets
And nobody knows what the value for “smart contract fuel” is..
..when they’re supposed to solve high fees...
There’s a monetary premium here that’s being broadbrushed all over everything that’s on CoinGecko.
Most of it is just valued by association (in relation to something else) even though those links don’t really survive when they’re interlinked in two, three, questionable steps
I’m not complaining but FA is completely broken at this point
Everyone complains exchanges aren’t enabling Lightning withdrawals/deposits & the narrative seems to be that ”exchanges don’t want to admit bitcoin scales!/they’re busy listing shitcoins” and then @binance integrates @arbitrum Ethereum L2 straight out of the box what’s that about
Binance has every incentive to pretend Ethereum doesn’t scale since it leads to tons of trading volume in other competing L1s, including their very own Binance Smart Chain geth-fork, which they’ve been trying to steer people toward heavily on their withdrawal page interface.
Maybe it’s because all you need to withdraw to an Ethereum L2 is an Ethereum address, no set-up or inbound liquidity needed, and that Ethereum L2s can do large transfers just fine and don’t need to worry about routes?