Share this page!

Simon Cox Profile picture
Twitter logo
22 Dec, 4 tweets, 1 min read
Edgy comedians like Bernard Manning had completely lost the crowd 20+ years ago
Shot, chaser.
Merton’s Hitler Q was genuine.

Manning:
"I am an admirer of Adolf Hitler. Not everything about him, of course. I deplore his gas chambers and Gestapo as much as anyone, but I admire him for the things he got right, which I reckon was about 50 per cent."
irishtimes.com/news/racist-an…
so *current* when Manning said then he can’t stop saying racist things because that would “let them off the hook”.

He believed racist jokes were essential to hold minorities accountable, to keep them in check.

• • •

Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to force a refresh
　

Keep Current with Simon Cox

Simon Cox Profile picture

Stay in touch and get notified when new unrolls are available from this author!

Read all threads

This Thread may be Removed Anytime!

PDF

Twitter may remove this content at anytime! Save it as PDF for later use!

Try unrolling a thread yourself!

how to unroll video
  1. Follow @ThreadReaderApp to mention us!

  2. From a Twitter thread mention us with a keyword "unroll"
@threadreaderapp unroll

Practice here first or read more on our help page!

More from @SimonFRCox

Simon Cox Profile picture
23 Dec
Electronic tagging in UK for asylum-seekers?

Home Office Anon tells Sun its the cheap, easy answer to stop Channel crossings.

Tl;dr that claim is bogus - but lays the ground for massive extension of the surveillance state.

THREAD 1/ Image
125,000 asylum-seekers in UK. Application numbers historically low, but pending claims high because Home Office officials refuse to decide cases, procrastinating for years instead of issuing permits to refugees & others they can’t remove. commonslibrary.parliament.uk/research-brief… 2/ Image
Some asylum-seekers are detained. But vast majority are on “immigration bail”, a scare-criminal-sounding re-labelling of “temporary admission” by May’s Immigration Act 2016 3/ Image
Read 15 tweets
Simon Cox Profile picture
22 Dec
I first met Laura when she came up to me at court and said “I’m going to be your pupil” (barrister). And I said “but we haven’t decided who your supervisor will b…” and she was like “ok, but it’s going to be you”. And it was…+
+ showing that same vision & tenacity… (she had been a trades union organiser of garment workers in USA) Laura was a superbly intelligent and hardworking pupil, so much so that +
+ towards the end of pupillage Laura was poached to work on tricky international issues at the Special Court for Sierra Leone +
Read 4 tweets
Simon Cox Profile picture
20 Dec
Lesson for tweeters from important judgment in Riley v Murray: don’t share your damaging take on a tweet without including a screen shot. My THREAD on the judgment 1/
I am not a libel lawyer. This thread is not legal advice. I am just someone who says really critical things and does not like to be sued for libel. (And hasn’t been.) 2/
Murray tweeted her take on what Riley meant in her tweet, without QT or screenshot. 3/
Read 12 tweets
Simon Cox Profile picture
16 Dec
British court uses British Human Rights Act to interpret British Nationality Act to allow British Home Sec to grant British citizenship to Windrush victims.

Opposed by Home Sec - who didn’t even want the *power* to make them citizens.+
Home Office illegally refused them re-entry to UK, because they had been legally resident here so long Home Office didn’t realise they were legally resident. +
Then Home Office said it couldn’t naturalise them as British citizens because of the law saying they must have been resident on the day 5 years before the citizenship application. +
Read 5 tweets
Simon Cox Profile picture
11 Dec
did national media publish this sort of legal falseness before Brexit? We can discuss what s.73 *means* but you only have to read it to see it does not “state”this.

Or is it just a feature of the Spectator becoming a blog?
I say “falseness” deliberately. It’s fine for lawyers to argue that provisions don’t mean what they say, or mean more than they say. But that isn’t the claim here. And the piece is by a lawyer, about the law. It’s not a passing comment.
But does Section 73 *mean* that Covid Regs don’t apply on Gov land? (Courts seem to behave as if they do.)

Why would a local authority’s agreement be needed to for Ministers to apply their own Regs to the land they control?
Read 6 tweets
Simon Cox Profile picture
4 Dec
Some of you are reading Adam’s thread as if he’s said stripping citizenship is good, or should (politically / morally) be allowed. His thread doesn’t say that. Its a thread about what *law* says and (surprise!) law (made by states) isn’t that great.
Disclosure: me and Adam are in the same chambers.

But I haven’t discussed this with him, or read everything he’s written. So I don’t know if I agree with him. But what he says *in this thread* *abt human rights law* is correct.

And IMHO it’s useful for people to have that info
International human rights law instruments do not state an absolute bar on citizenship-stripping. They require it not be arbitrary and they (therefore) require due process.

That’s the information Adam is conveying.
Read 5 tweets

Did Thread Reader help you today?

Support us! We are indie developers!

This site is made by just two indie developers on a laptop doing marketing, support and development! Read more about the story.

Become a Premium Member ($3/month or $30/year) and get exclusive features!

Become Premium

Too expensive? Make a small donation by buying us coffee ($5) or help with server cost ($10)

Donate via Paypal

Or Donate anonymously using crypto!

Ethereum

0xfe58350B80634f60Fa6Dc149a72b4DFbc17D341E copy

Bitcoin

3ATGMxNzCUFzxpMCHL5sWSt4DVtS8UqXpi copy

Thank you for your support!

Follow Us on Twitter!

Like this author's thread?

Get emails when @SimonFRCox has new unrolls!

Check out other threads from @SimonFRCox!

Read all threads by @SimonFRCox

:(