PHAC is not being truthful when they say that the data tracking of 33 million mobile devices respects privacy
They claim to have tracked "cell tower location." Except knowing the location of cell towers is a very short step away from locating individuals cdt.org/insights/locat…
A cell-tower dump request to an ISP will include identifiable information of all cell phones/devices in a given area such as signal strength and the type of device. The movement of devices between cell tower ranges is also a dead giveaway of individual location.
Remember, PHAC has not specifically elaborated on what data metrics they collected. In their statement, they claim to have "collected and used mobility data SUCH AS cell tower location."
Key point: cell tower location is only one example of the data they are citing.
PHAC says that they have hired outside contractors to "clean and process" the data to remove identifiable info.
Firstly, having that amount of data transferred to a third-party is a huge cyber security risk (how can the gov ensure they have the right security measures in place?)
Secondly, it's basically an admission that personally identifiable data WAS picked up in their initial sweep. Otherwise, data cleaning would be a relatively simple procedure.
The question remains: what personally identifiable information was picked up in PHAC's data sweep?
In the past year alone there have been ransomeware attacks on transportation, healthcare and even vaxx passes.
PHAC has made no assurances that the data is secure and the necessary resources to protect it from cybercriminals/foreign actors are being devoted.
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
EXCLUSIVE: The @TorontoStar and the @globeandmail published multiple op-eds discussing vaccine mandates and research funding by U of T professor Mark Lautens without disclosing that he's received funding from AstraZeneca. @TrueNorthCentre
@TorontoStar@globeandmail@TrueNorthCentre Lautens has not hidden his financial relationship with the COVID-19 vax manufacturer as it appears on his public CV and in a tweet where he thanked the company for their support.
Meanwhile, the outlets only referred to him by his other title "J.B. Jones Professor of Chemistry."
@TorontoStar@globeandmail@TrueNorthCentre In one @globeandmail op-ed Lautens describes mandatory vaccination for post-secondary students in residence as an "awfully low bar." Elsewhere, he discourages "vaccine shopping" and names the company directly without revealing his ties.
In 2020 the Ottawa Carleton District School Board did a survey on identity and its methodology relied on a book on "critical race theory of statistics."
In the survey, they claimed that numbers were "not neutral" and "serve white racial interests."
All you have to do is look and realize that CRT is everywhere in Canadian schools.
Earlier this year, the Peel District School Board recommended a curriculum on professional learning for senior staff that was "rooted in critical race theory."
Not sure if this has been shared yet but the BC Human Rights tribunal released its full decision on the Jessica Yaniv publication ban online. @goinglikeelsie@preta_6
Some interesting things to note- Yaniv's tactic to get her mother to take responsibility for writing her nastier tweets during a cross-examination failed.
One of the tweets in question is reference in reason #8 potentially giving some substance to the claim that Yaniv has a bias towards minorities.
Now that everybody’s attention is on Antifa because of the vicious attack on @MrAndyNgo in Portland, I thought I'd do a round up of articles covering violent Antifa incidents that took place here in Canada.
If you can think of more please comment and I’ll add to the list.
A Toronto Sun journalist/photographer was assaulted at an Antifa rally