First observation: my most popular piece was about the culture wars! But my interest is how culture war politics affect governance, so I followed this up with a series of stories about how the anti-CRT movement is affecting school officials and leading to book bans. 2/
Second reflection: part of what compelled me to start writing is the sense that populism is having a real and tangible effect on the ability of public officials to use expertise to do their jobs. Will be writing more about this in the domains of public health & elections 4/
Second most popular piece: review of Fox News coverage.
By sifting through the evidence and focusing on a series of high-quality social science studies, I make the case that Fox is *causing* worse pandemic health outcomes. 5/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/fox-news-is-…
Third reflection: a lot of governance outcomes are co-produced, i.e. depend on coordinated action btw government, civil society and the individual. The pandemic has underlined this point. But anti-government outlets like Fox make that coordination much less likely in the US. 6/
Third most popular story: very insider baseball story about how the Biden administration puts the citizen experience of government at the center of its administrative reform agenda. 7/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/the-biden-ad…
Fourth observation: it's really exciting to write about wonky govt administration topics in a way that explains their relevance to a broader public. Thats a journey I've been on over the last decade as a scholar, and the goal of the substack is to do it in a different venue. 9/
Fifth observation: writing a piece once a week or so is a challenge. I have new-found respect for those who do this full time! But it feels like good governance has never been more relevant, and so there is an obligation on those of us who study it to reach out 10/
Sixth observation: I was skeptical about substack but was propelled when - all the way back in Sept! - I was struggling to place an op-ed piece about Manchin going after the Child Tax Credit. Lot of value in just being able to post something quickly. 11/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/save-the-chi…
• • •
Missing some Tweet in this thread? You can try to
force a refresh
Heckman gives the impression that Denmark's welfare state does not reduce inequality, then in a casual aside at the end, acknowledges that it does but via solutions (wealth redistribution) he seems to dislike rather than his preferred approach of education.
Heckman is a great scholar, and I buy his underlying research that the more advantaged can benefit more from more generous public services. But this seems to argue for inequality-reducing policies that can't be gamed, rather than assuming there is nothing to learn from Denmark.
People can agree on what the research tells us, but disagree on the implications. For me, Heckman's work helps to narrow the search for how Denmark reduced intergenerational inequality and draw more attention to redistribution.
H/T Gray Kimbrough
Meghan McCain is blaming political ideology for her failures as View presenter, but her political ideology and famous name helped get her invited to the party in the first place, she can't have it both ways.
If I was Meghan McCain I would simply not write stories alleging that someone's career was based on favoritism.
In a column where she spends multiple paragraphs reminiscing about her Dad, McCain declares that she, for one, believes that the most qualified person should get the job. Riiiight.
This sounds remarkably definitive but also a much more radical position than the past where he raised concerns about specific pieces of BBB, but not the whole thing.
Going from "we need a 10 year costs for the bill" or "work requirements for the CTC" to "no, I can't support anything" - on Fox - doesn't seem like a good-faith negotiation process.
Whats at stake with BBB.
If it fails, we lose real solutions to real problems:
*Best shot at climate change
*Anti-poverty child tax credit
*Medicaid expansion + stopping large ACA premium increases
*Affordable housing
Biden just signed a new executive order aimed at improving people's experience of government. It includes a lot of significant changes for different agencies and programs. @pamela_herd and I break it all down. 🧵 donmoynihan.substack.com/p/understandin…
There are some big themes, and some specific policy changes. The most obvious starting point is that this is the most substantive governmentwide effort that is centrally focused on administrative burdens for members of the public. 2/ donmoynihan.substack.com/p/understandin…
The EO green lights a wide array of research that agencies should pursue to better understand people's experience of government.
Evidence-based and people-centered is a good formula for governing. 3/
Pleased my research w @pamela_herd had an impact, but the biggest credit goes to key federal government employees who have been thinking about user design issues and administrative burden for over a year. Without them the EO simply would not have happened.