"For each of the 219 nations in the Our World in Data repo , I tallied COVID-19 cases and deaths [...] Every correlation is positive; more vaccination is associated with more COVID-19 cases and more COVID-19 deaths from @EduEngineerroundingtheearth.substack.com/p/systemic-cov…
2 doses of astrazeneca or Pfizer both result in negative efficacy against omicron. imperial college study.
rate among fully vaccinated in Iceland has accelerated very sharply and now reached the rate of 'not fully vaccinated' (fully unvaccinated rate not shown)
at the top of thread i linked to ontario data. at the time it didn't show that vaccd had a higher rate of infection (my error), just that cases were accelerating sharply among that cohort. today the same source *does* show fully vaccd overtaking the unvacced infection rate.
in Ontario both partially and fully vaccd case rates have overtaken the unvaccinated case rate
same tend in Alberta. the fully vaccinated case rate has just overtaken the unvaccinated case rate.
this study examined 68 countries (selected on the basis of adequate data records) and found a positive correlation between vaccination rate and infection rate. ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/labs/pmc/artic…
Iceland update. 'fully vaccinated' case rate now in the lead by a very large margin.
the rate of infection among 18-29 year olds in the UK is now higher for the vaccinated than for the unvaccinated. true unvaccinated rate is believed to lie between the NIMS and ONS figures.
see above thread for more detail. according to NIMS data all age groups in the UK, with the exception of <18, are now seeing higher infection rate among vaccinated.
more on UK data 'the more you test regardless of symptoms, the more you find it. This would be why it emerges so strongly in pre-Christmas testing, when millions of healthy people got tested to know whether it was safe to see their elderly relatives'
ontario data has been updated including age group breakdowns running into january. for the age groups between 12 and 59 the fully vaccinated group has the highest case rate. thanks @C_Ups17 for the heads up.
previous stats in this thread have dealt with negative (and steeply declining) vacc efficacy against infection only.
latest gov data from Scotland shows negative vacc efficacy (for 2 doses) for infection *and also* for hospitalization and death. nakedemperor.substack.com/p/complete-vac…
for all age groups older than 18 in the UK, the vaccinated currently have a significantly higher infection rate. about double the unvaccinated rate.
source assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/upl…
really interesting UK graph. you can see the apparent waning and negative efficacy for the vaccines early in the series but that trend accelerates very sharply for all groups when omicron arrives.
continuing negative vacc efficacy in Scotland for cases, acute hospitalisations, and deaths. 1 & 2 dose groups doing worst.
unvaccd fare best for case rate.
'boosted' (recently dosed) appear best off in terms of avoiding hospitalisation and death publichealthscotland.scot/media/11318/22…
current Israel data. for all age groups, the sub group most susceptible to infection is either 'partially vaccinated' or 'boosted' (never unvaccinated)
those crucial two weeks post injection show up again in a study about BMI and covid
"in the two weeks following the first jab individuals were three to four times more likely to test positive for Covid than their unvaccinated counterparts."
a study commissioned by Moderna finds that 151 days or more after the last dose, 3x vaccinated (Moderna) showed negative efficacy against four out of the five Omicron strains tested.
(caveat: as the pandemic goes on, the evidence of negative vcc efficacy will increasingly reflect vcc immune disadvantage *wrt those with natural immunity to the viruses*, rather than wrt immunologically naïve people)
I totally endorse this. a big failure mode of parents is to be so excited by what their kid is doing that they interrupt what the kid is doing, 'encouragement'. let them do their work! don't make it about you. enjoy it quietly. comment on how much you enjoyed it later when they come to you.
the ability of a kid to play/explore contentedly for long periods is, imo, very virtuous for both kid (future adult) and parent. you probably don't want to disrupt the development of this skill
"Searle's in a room followin' English instructions to mess with Chinese symbols, but he ain't understandin' it. It's like a computer doin' the same thing. Searle's arguin' against "Strong AI," sayin' computers can't truly think or understand language like us.
Aight, so peeps be comin' up with this Systems Reply to Searle's Chinese Room. They sayin', "Yo, the dude in the room don't get Chinese, but the whole system does." The man's just the CPU, with the whole shebang like databases, memory, and instructions doin' the work.
Kurzweil be like, "Yo, if the system shows it understands Chinese, then it really does." Searle contradicts himself
i don't think humans (as general intelligences) are unconstrainedly creative with regard to modifying that which determines our objectives. which is the relevant thing in this context. and i don't think we should assume AGIs will be either.
claim: our meta objective is to activate reward centers in our brain. creativity has no direct bearing on this. (we are mesa optimizers for hitting that button, to the anthropomorphised dismay of natural selection)
creativity *is* relevant to the ways we figure out how to pursue lighting up that area, and the learning we undertake that modifies under what conditions that area lights up.
this underestimates how alien a mind can be. it contains the assumption that an AGI is going to be like a foreign human. seems unlikely given it shares neither mammalian or even animal evo heritage thttps://twitter.com/DavidDeutschOxf/status/1642148584979066880?s=20
all obviously very smart people. which is why I've tried more than once to understand critical rationalism 😅
but also comes with the most dogmatic sounding rhetoric I've heard outside Christian presuppositional apologetics and objectivists. ngl that's off-putting.
part of the impression of dogmatism, for me, comes from hewing to non-standard meanings for a bunch of important words like problem, knowledge. and imo not adequately meeting non believers 'where they are' with respect to the language
'an everage mind can totally understand critrat given the proper study'
ok. but opportunity cost is a thing. there's a world with lots to do in it. CR is competing for my time with everything else. why should I give it that indulgence when it seems false early on?