THREAD. When the history is written of rising fascism, ecological catastrophe, and disastrous lack of healthcare/housing, this CBS story can be used as a damning portrait of how the news media distorted what counts as urgent and what counts as safety. losangeles.cbslocal.com/2021/12/07/we-…
Take a look at the sources that the CBS Los Angeles reporters and editors chose to use, in chronological order, supposedly to inform the public about what is happening in Los Angeles:
-Cop union president (who has shot 6 people)
-Cop union president (again)
-Random woman who moved to LA 6 months ago.
-Police Chief
-Police Chief (denying science to criticize bail reform)
-Police Chief again
-Anonymous tourist
-Unidentified “people out in Hollywood”
-DA
The lead source, and apparent impetus for the story, is a notorious fascist who the article quotes as if he is a credible person describing LA as being like the "Purge" movie. Take a look at this investigation into the leading source CBS news chose:
You can't make this stuff up: the only piece of actual police data quoted in the article finds that, while robberies are up only 5% from last year, they are still 13% below 2019 before the pandemic!
Meanwhile, crime is near historic lows in Los Angeles and California generally.
And yet, with no explanation and no support, CBS reporters declare as if it were objective fact: "Rampant crime continues." (The article contains no mention of actual facts, like that LAPD keeps killing people.)
Instead of fact-checking any of this or interviewing people in communities being targeted by LAPD, landlords, real estate developers, toxic polluters, and predatory lenders, the CBS reporters merely note that the police union warning "seems to resonate with some residents.”
The CBS reporters are careful not to identify any of the random anonymous residents they cherry-picked to bolster fascist talking points. They just keep insisting that, despite actual evidence: “many people [are] feeling Southern California is experiencing a violent crime wave.”
The article thus boils down to *many anonymous people* (but not most people) are talking about how they "feel" about crime even though crime is near historic lows and not even close to the most likely cause of injury and death in Los Angeles (like poverty, pollution, etc..)
It's important to think about how and why stories like this become local news, and who makes that decision, especially as we face huge, existential threats to human survival that simply aren't treated with the same urgency:
For more information on how this "crime wave" is being manufactured and, worse, used to justify increased police and prison budgets contrary to all scientific evidence, read this thread:
I'm not sure I've ever seen an "article" like this glowing "profile" of a DA in the Detroit Free Press. It begins with the DA telling a story about how *Angela Davis* inspired her to pursue a career putting human beings in cages. It only gets weirder. freep.com/story/news/loc…
Article is a series of soaring quotes about how amazing prosecution is, but the denial of police brutality in Detroit (not fact checked) is astonishing:
"The type of police brutality that we have seen in other places has not been tolerated in Wayne County, and mostly Detroit."
That a major newspaper would let a prosecutor falsely declare that "police brutality" has not been "tolerated" in Detroit is amazing. It flies in the face of decades of brutality and is an insult to the movement of people organizing against brutality in Detroit @DETWILLBREATHE
THREAD: Have you noticed how the news often reports the stated motives of powerful people as their *actual motives.* This is one way in which the news can subtly reinforce myths that benefit the wealthiest and most powerful interests in our society.
Look at how Manchin's actions are often portrayed as him having good-faith ideological concerns (like "inflation") rather than him being rich, owning a coal company, family rich from pharmaceuticals, and being paid by dark money to serve them. cnn.com/2021/12/19/pol…
This is harmful because it obscures for all of us how the political system really works and what interests, biases, and forms of corruption are actually determining why politicians do what they do.
THREAD. Given the recent police and corporate hysteria over crime, homelessness, drug use, and retail theft, here are a few helpful caveats for journalists interested in being more objective to put in stories about "crime data" or when police ask them to report on a "crime wave":
"Property crime data excludes most property crime, including illegal seizures by police (which roughly equal all reported burglary), wage theft by employers (which is about 5x more than all reported property crime), and tax evasion (which is about 20x more than all wage theft)."
"Violent crime data reported by police excludes nearly all of the violent crimes committed by police and jail guards, which experts estimate to include several million physical and sexual assaults each year."
THREAD: A young trucker whose brakes failed before a crash that killed 4 people just got sentenced to 110 years in prison--mandatory death in prison for a crash he didn't intend. There are several very important and hidden things going:
First, a great irony of US law is that it purports to set a high standard of evidence (beyond a reasonable doubt) to convict a person, but it allows human caging of millions without a shred of evidence that *the sentence* does any good.
In fact, most sentencing in U.S. is unconstitutional. Constitution requires judges to apply strict scrutiny when a "fundamental right" is taken away, and bodily liberty is such a right. This means sentence must be as narrowly tailored as possible to serve a compelling interest.
He lost control of his truck and instead of a traffic ticket, the “progressive prosecutor” wants him to die in prison notorious for sexual and physical assault. Why? He had the audacity to say he was innocent and wouldn’t waive his right to a trial. thedenverchannel.com/news/local-new…
Compare the sneaky way this monstrous “progressive prosecutor” pretends that the jury sanctioned this outcome with what the actual jurors say:
The mentality of this “progressive prosecutor” reflects a deep (but intentionally cultivated) sickness in our society. When we see bad outcomes, we have been trained to look for a “bad person” to blame. This focus on individual blame is profitable for people who control systems.
The way solitary confinement is used in the U.S. constitutes torture as defined by the UN. It is a federal felony crime to torture someone. In the U.S., the law is interpreted and enforced by elites, and they only enforce some laws against some people. yalelawjournal.org/forum/the-puni…